✅ | Imam Ali (A) said: Be in times of sedition like a young camel (ibn al-labūn) that has neither a back fit to be ridden nor udders to be milked.”

(Nahj al-Balāghah: Hikmah-1)

What does it mean?

It is part of the Imam’s lengthy will addressed to his son, Imam al-Hasan al-Mujtaba (A) (Makarem Shirazi, Naser, 1393 [2014], vol. 12, p. 26; citing: Bihār al-Anwār, vol. 74, p. 234, hadith 3)

Unlike the term “political crisis,” which carries a neutral connotation, the concept of fitnah (sedition) evokes a realistic portrayal of social turmoil and calls the members of the political community to collective participation in successfully overcoming that chaos. Only the seditionists and chaos-seekers desire stagnation in such times. Thus, religious political thought, by labeling a social upheaval as fitnah, draws attention to the fact that the society is undergoing a difficult trial. It must then take rational steps to pass through this trial in safety. At this point, the question arises: what are those rational steps? The words of the Commander of the Faithful, Imam Ali (A, in this wisdom, serve as an answer to that question.

It rarely happens that time passes uniformly for a political society. Rather, it is always subject to strong or mild turbulence. The reason for this lies in the political nature of society. Politics is the field of deliberate action directed at power and social order. The manifestation of these deliberate actions—due to the non-abstract nature of politics—is inherently interactive. It is through these interactions, whether harmonious or conflictual, that tensions arise.

Fitnah refers to a temporal condition where the political society is entangled in a high degree of antagonistic political interactions. Modern political science refers to such a condition as a “political crisis,” but religious thought calls it fitnah-i-siyāsī (political sedition).

As evident in the Holy Qur’an and the words of Imam Ali (A), this same term is used, because from the perspective of religious politics, the occurrence of disputes and conflicts in a political society is seen as a test and trial for each member of the community. This is consistent with the linguistic and conventional meaning of the word fitnah. Linguistically, fitnah means placing gold into the fire to separate the pure from the impure. More broadly, it refers to any test, trial, or tribulation.

Ayatullah Makarim Shirazi interprets fitnah here as social turmoil. (Ibid, vol. 12, p. 23).

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

The concept of political fitnah (sedition or turmoil), unlike political crisis—which carries a neutral connotation—offers a realistic narrative of social chaos and calls upon members of the political community to engage collectively in order to successfully overcome the upheaval. For it is none other than the seditionists and chaos-mongers who desire a prolonged state of unrest. Thus, religious politics—by referring to social turmoil as fitnah—signals that society is undergoing a difficult test and must take rational steps to pass through it safely. It is here that the question of what those rational steps are becomes relevant. Imam Ali’s (A) statement in this aphorism provides an answer to that question.

Imam Ali (A) illustrates the rational step in navigating political fitnah using the metaphor of Ibn al-Labūn, a two-year-old camel. A mature she-camel possesses two major features: the ability to carry loads and to produce milk. A two-year-old camel, however, has neither. In this analogy, members of the political community are assumed to be capable of two key actions: bearing political power and nourishing it. Political participation by the people implies these two functions. But political fitnah relies on these functions for its continuation; when people become involved in the fitnah, they carry and nourish the social disorder. Thus, people themselves may unwittingly become agents of perpetuating sedition and political unrest.

The rational course of action for people, therefore, is neither to carry the fitnah nor to nourish it—that is, to leave sedition and chaos isolated in the political arena.

This metaphor of Ibn al-Labūn holds greater significance for political and intellectual elites. A political elite, due to his position and authority in governance, becomes an effective tool for transporting sedition. Misplaced support for fitnah by a political elite offers chaos-mongers the opportunity to ride on the back of disorder. Similarly, intellectual elites—due to their spiritual or moral standing in society—if not cautious in their speech, may inadvertently utter words that nourish sedition and unrest.

Some have interpreted this metaphorical wisdom as an encouragement for the general public to retreat into isolation and abandon political participation altogether in times of social turmoil. However, this interpretation is inconsistent with both Qur’anic teachings and the examples set by the Prophet (S) and Imam Ali (A). Even during the time Imam Ali (A) was forced into political seclusion, he never abandoned his political stance.

And when he did accept the caliphate, Medina was deep in fitnah and chaos. The third caliph, Uthman, had been killed, and Mu’awiyah, son of Abu Sufyan, was deceitfully positioning himself to seize the political legacy of the Prophet (S). It was in this climate that Imam Ali (A) rejected isolation and accepted political leadership and governance. Similarly, Imam Husayn (A) did not choose isolation in the face of Yazid’s fitnah, but instead rose up against it. Had the people of Kufa, instead of siding with Ibn Ziyad or retreating into passivity, pledged allegiance to the Imam, the tragic event of Karbala would not have occurred.

The commentator from Khurasan, Mirza Habibullah Hashemi Khoyi, a scholar of the 13th and 14th centuries AH (1265–1324 Hijri), emphasizes this point: Imam Ali (A) did not mean retreat, laziness, or heedless rest. Rather, he intended to caution against cooperation with the instigators of fitnah and to avoid supporting them in their corrupt objectives. (Hashemi Khoyi, Mirza Habibullah, 1429 Hijri, vol. 21, p. 10)

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

Similarly, Ayatullah Makarim Shirazi confirms this meaning: it is clear from what has been said that Imam Ali (A) never intended that if a group of wrongdoers rises against believers and seekers of truth, one should not support the righteous. This would contradict the explicit command of the Qur’an, which says:

“If one group among the believers transgresses against another, then fight the group that transgresses until it returns to the command of God.” [Qur’an, Surah al-Hujurat, 49:9]

Therefore, the Ibn al-Labūn strategy—for both political and intellectual elites and the general public—is a model of rationality and insight necessary for navigating political and social fitnah. Members of the political community must not, in times of sedition, become carriers or sustainers of political disorder.

The ongoing battle between Indo-Pak nations is not merely a bilateral issue but is part of a larger, coordinated project involving israel and the United States. These external players often benefit from the fragmentation and weakening of the region, manipulating local wars for broader strategic goals.

For the nationalists of both India and Pakistan, the lesson here is one of political maturity and foresight. Instead of perpetuating the divisive narratives that pit India and Pakistan against each other, it is crucial to recognize that the true battle is not about the two nations but about resisting the manipulation of external powers that fuel this war for their own gain. The Ibn al-Labūn lesson urges both nations to detach themselves from these external machinations, to stop nourishing the fitnah, and to focus on unity, stability, and sovereignty. The conflict between India and Pakistan should be understood not just as a territorial dispute but as part of a larger geopolitical struggle that serves the interests of foreign powers. Nationalists in both countries must transcend the limited view of India vs. Pakistan and recognize that this conflict is being driven by larger, external actors who have long-term strategies that involve keeping the region unstable.

🔹@enemywatch

🇲🇦 Breaking — The Israeli Occupation Forces are taking part in the “African Lion” military exercises alongside over 20 armies — including those of Morocco, Tunisia, and Libya. Egypt reportedly withdrew from the drills three days ago.

🔹@enemywatch

🗞️ | Khaleel Nasrallah writes:

The Lebanese state is powerless in the south in the face of the Israeli aggression — it has not only proven its incapacity but cemented its complete impotence.

The southerners are losing their loved ones to the fire of Israeli drones.

“Israel” is treating the frontline villages as a shooting and killing range.

Yet the southerners remain steadfast, because they believe in a hope called the resistance.

If things remain as they are, and the state remains incapable, a resistance operation is inevitable.

This is clear-cut — and could materialize at any moment.

Can it be accepted that “israel” is blatantly and arrogantly preventing reconstruction, and killing wherever its hand reaches — while the state stands powerless, even silent, with nothing in its hands but “courting” Washington?

Let us be frank: the current trajectory and the current reality will ultimately lead to confrontation.

🔹@enemywatch

🇾🇪 Breaking — A Yemeni ballistic missile has reportedly been launched toward Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv.

🔹@enemywatch

🗞️ | Khaleel Nasrallah writes:

Trump admits that the sanctions on Syria have fulfilled their purpose and that he will now lift them.

This means that the new administration has yielded to what Washington wants.

Nothing comes for free.

No need for applause.

And while Trump was speaking in Riyadh and touched on the Yemeni issue—repeating his claim that the “Houthis” had yielded—the Yemeni Armed Forces sent a message deep into Israeli territory.

There is definitely a connection between the Yemeni missile and Trump’s grandstanding speech.

Trump is a “fox”… He does whatever he sees as beneficial for Washington, its influence, and control—and then sells it to them: “I’ll do it for your request!”

🔹@enemywatch

☑️ | One of the major outcomes of Trump’s Gulf trip appears to be the isolation of Iran and gaining the confidence of Arab regimes. Many signs point to this. Iran has declared that it is ready to face all consequences.

🔹@enemywatch

🇾🇪 Breaking — Yemeni Armed statement:

The missile force of the Yemeni Armed Forces carried out a military operation targeting Lod Airport—known under the Zionist regime as Ben Gurion Airport—in the occupied area of Jaffa, using a hypersonic ballistic missile.

By the grace of God, the missile successfully hit its target, causing millions of occupying Zionists to flee to shelters and leading to a shutdown of airport activity for approximately one hour.

This operation reaffirms the continued enforcement of the no-fly zone over this airport. Airlines that have not yet announced a halt to their flights to this airport must follow the example of those who have already suspended flights to airports in the occupied Palestinian territories.

🔹@enemywatch

☑️ | The value of the arms deal between the United States and Saudi Arabia stands at $142 billion—a staggering figure roughly equivalent to Israel’s defense budget for seven consecutive years. This isn’t just a transaction; it’s a strategic message. It signals a rearmament of the Gulf under Washington’s patronage, at a time when the region teeters on the edge.

While terrorist Julani—landed in Riyadh to shake hands with his master, Donald Trump, the UAE is simultaneously sealing a separate weapons deal. These aren’t isolated events. They’re part of a broader militarization campaign, preparing regimes for a post-Gaza regional realignment.

At the same time, India and Pakistan—two nuclear-armed neighbors—are inching toward a dictated or impulsive war, a confrontation that could erupt at any moment. With tensions surging in Kashmir, and both sides ramping up troop deployments, the threat of mass slaughter or even genocide is no longer theoretical. It is operationally possible—and in this geopolitical climate, morally expendable to those in power.

Something is breaking. Either we are witnessing the slow collapse of the current regional order, or the early tremors of a larger, orchestrated catastrophe. The air may yet go out of the balloon quietly. Or it may burst, violently and beyond repair.

The Takfiri project exported from Syria is not dying—it is mutating. It will soon be reactivated or dragged eastward, with Iraq next in line. Already, signals from Iraqi intelligence suggest that the threat is ahead, not behind. The post-Mosul quiet is deceptive; sleeper cells, external funding, and renewed ideological grooming are paving the way for a second phase of chaos.

Balochistan is boiling again, and the TTP (Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan) is no longer just a border threat—it’s an internal rupture. Pakistan is now facing multi-directional instability, and the military doctrine of ‘strategic depth’ has collapsed into a domestic security nightmare. The state’s credibility in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is eroding fast, and the insurgencies there are no longer disconnected; they’re increasingly entangled in the larger game.

And no analysis is complete without the Taliban. Far from being a buffer or stabilizer, they are now a wild card—both a source of regional spillover and a potential conduit for new extremist corridors stretching from Central Asia to the Indian subcontinent. Their ambiguous posture toward foreign Takfiri elements only adds fuel to the fire.

What we’re seeing is not a scattered set of crises but the emergence of a transnational destabilization wave. The Syria model is evolving, not ending—and this time, its axis runs through Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, with backing from powers who benefit from a fragmented, bleeding region.

Time will tell. But the signs are all there.

🔹@enemywatch

🇾🇪 Breaking — A ballistic missile launched from Yemen targeted al-Quds approximately 30 minutes ago. Landings and takeoffs at Ben Gurion Airport suspended following a missile launch from Yemen.

🔹@enemywatch

🇾🇪 Breaking — A second ballistic missile has likely been launched from Yemen toward occupied Palestine, shortly after the first strike targeting al-Quds.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | While Trump was babbling, blabbering, and jabbering in Saudi Arabia, three Yemeni ballistic missiles flew over his head and struck the israeli entity within the past 20 hours.

🔹@enemywatch

🇵🇸 Breaking — At least 62 Palestinians have been martyred in Gaza over the past 3 hours as Israeli airstrikes intensify across multiple neighborhoods.

🔹@enemywatch