🇸🇾 | Rebranded Terrorist Julani Dines with U.S. Masters While Syrians Starve:
As Syria reels under relentless economic collapse, rebranded terrorist Julani—the former al-Qaeda commander turned Western media darling—continues posing for photo ops with his American masters. While families in Idlib and beyond are skipping meals, Julani walks red carpets laid out by think tanks and intelligence cut-outs eager to polish his image as a “local leader” or “counterterrorism partner.”
Today; In Damascus, this terrorist hosted U.S. Congressman Marlin Stutzman at the Presidential Palace—another signal of the hollow theater where foreign players praise “resilience” while Syrians are being economically crushed.
Today, the price of a single loaf of bread is 4,000 Syrian pounds. For a family of five, that’s three loaves daily—12,000 SYP a day or 360,000 SYP per month. Add basic transport to and from work: 4,000 SYP daily, 160,000 SYP per month. That’s 520,000 SYP just for bread and transport—while the average salary is only 300,000 SYP.
Syrians are working only to afford the ride to work. Food, electricity, medicine—all are luxuries. They live on borrowed money and unpaid bills.
And yet, under Julani’s HTS rule, thousands are fired from jobs, new taxes are imposed, and entire properties are seized under the guise of security or “Shari‘a courts.” Those who protest are jailed, tortured, or quietly disappeared. Humanitarian aid is blocked or politicized, allowed only through HTS-controlled channels that demand allegiance in return for survival.
Julani’s apologists who smoke weed in the name of caliphate or whatever they think; 'the mossad sponsored Sharia eutopia' from Bangladesh or Pakistan or Netherlands blame sanctions, but starvation, property confiscation, kidnappings, targeted killings, and brutal sectarian crackdowns have nothing to do with external embargoes. These are the tools of a mafia-state.
Julani’s transition—from a blacklisted terrorist to a necktie-wearing “governor” of Idlib to self claimed President—has been engineered not by reform, but by Western intelligence services and media laundering. The man responsible for massacres, sectarian cleansing, and the silencing of dissent is now used to serve geopolitical interests at the cost of Syrian blood.
The world may buy the PR. Syrians, especially those in the bread lines, do not.
🔹@enemywatch
As Syria reels under relentless economic collapse, rebranded terrorist Julani—the former al-Qaeda commander turned Western media darling—continues posing for photo ops with his American masters. While families in Idlib and beyond are skipping meals, Julani walks red carpets laid out by think tanks and intelligence cut-outs eager to polish his image as a “local leader” or “counterterrorism partner.”
Today; In Damascus, this terrorist hosted U.S. Congressman Marlin Stutzman at the Presidential Palace—another signal of the hollow theater where foreign players praise “resilience” while Syrians are being economically crushed.
Today, the price of a single loaf of bread is 4,000 Syrian pounds. For a family of five, that’s three loaves daily—12,000 SYP a day or 360,000 SYP per month. Add basic transport to and from work: 4,000 SYP daily, 160,000 SYP per month. That’s 520,000 SYP just for bread and transport—while the average salary is only 300,000 SYP.
Syrians are working only to afford the ride to work. Food, electricity, medicine—all are luxuries. They live on borrowed money and unpaid bills.
And yet, under Julani’s HTS rule, thousands are fired from jobs, new taxes are imposed, and entire properties are seized under the guise of security or “Shari‘a courts.” Those who protest are jailed, tortured, or quietly disappeared. Humanitarian aid is blocked or politicized, allowed only through HTS-controlled channels that demand allegiance in return for survival.
Julani’s apologists who smoke weed in the name of caliphate or whatever they think; 'the mossad sponsored Sharia eutopia' from Bangladesh or Pakistan or Netherlands blame sanctions, but starvation, property confiscation, kidnappings, targeted killings, and brutal sectarian crackdowns have nothing to do with external embargoes. These are the tools of a mafia-state.
Julani’s transition—from a blacklisted terrorist to a necktie-wearing “governor” of Idlib to self claimed President—has been engineered not by reform, but by Western intelligence services and media laundering. The man responsible for massacres, sectarian cleansing, and the silencing of dissent is now used to serve geopolitical interests at the cost of Syrian blood.
The world may buy the PR. Syrians, especially those in the bread lines, do not.
🔹@enemywatch
😡15❤1
🇱🇧 | Is Disarming Hezbollah Possible?
In recent months, following the ceasefire between Lebanon and israeli entity, considerable debate has arisen over Hezbollah’s weapons and the broader resistance movement in Lebanon, sparking widespread controversy. When Joseph Aoun, the President of Lebanon, stated that weapons should only be in the hands of the army, it caused a major uproar across Lebanese political circles.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump’s special representative on Lebanese affairs, along with Witkoff's deputy, traveled to Lebanon and openly demanded that the Lebanese government and army disarm Hezbollah. Hezbollah responded strongly. Wafiq Safa, head of liaison and coordination for Hezbollah and one of the group’s top officials, emphasized in an interview that disarmament is not part of Hezbollah’s strategic roadmap and laid out conditions for it—conditions that are practically impossible to meet. Later, Leader Shaykh Naim Qassim made a significant speech declaring that anyone calling for disarmament of the resistance is serving the Israeli enemy free of charge.
Who is pushing for Hezbollah’s disarmament?
1. The United States:
The campaign is led by Morgan Ortagus, Vitkoff’s deputy and the new special U.S. envoy to the Middle East (replacing Amos Hochstein in Lebanon). She has visited Lebanon multiple times, openly declaring that her main goal is the dismantling of Lebanon’s resistance movement. Her efforts align with the U.S. strategy to alter Lebanon’s military-security equation by reshaping the political equation in Beirut.
2. March 14 Alliance:
This coalition of anti-Hezbollah Lebanese political groups has long sought ways to neutralize the resistance and sees the current moment as ideal. Figures like Samir Geagea, Ashraf Rifi, and members of the Hariri family are among its key actors.
3. Israel and the Current Syrian Regime:
Both Tel Aviv and the present ruling regime in Damascus, as external enemies of Hezbollah, seek to permanently end the movement’s power. This has led to repeated Israeli incursions into Lebanon for precisely that reason.
Possible Scenarios:
1. Civil War:
In this scenario, Hezbollah refuses to disarm, leading to heightened tensions. If the government and army attempt to disarm the movement by force, it could spark an all-out civil war.
2. Integration into the Army:
This is an unlikely option but has been floated by some in Lebanon—similar to the integration of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) into the military. President Aoun has already rejected it, and Hezbollah has shown no intention of accepting this either.
3. Status Quo Continues:
This is the most likely outcome. Hezbollah retains its weapons, including missiles and drones, while the Lebanese government refrains from attempting disarmament by force. Meanwhile, the responsibility for defending national sovereignty is gradually shifted toward the state itself.
What is Hezbollah’s strategy?
Following its intense war with Israel and the assassination of its commanders and officials, Lebanon’s resistance movement is undergoing a comprehensive rebuilding phase—restoring its military command, intelligence leadership, and political structure. Hezbollah aims to draw lessons from the recent war and rebuild its strength through a gradual recovery process that requires time.
For now, Hezbollah avoids escalating tensions and instead plans to focus on the political front, particularly the 2026 elections. It aims to secure key parliamentary seats and reassert its political influence—though this will be no easy task. Amid all these developments, the disarmament of Hezbollah remains the key flashpoint between the Western-backed factions and the resistance movement in Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch
In recent months, following the ceasefire between Lebanon and israeli entity, considerable debate has arisen over Hezbollah’s weapons and the broader resistance movement in Lebanon, sparking widespread controversy. When Joseph Aoun, the President of Lebanon, stated that weapons should only be in the hands of the army, it caused a major uproar across Lebanese political circles.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump’s special representative on Lebanese affairs, along with Witkoff's deputy, traveled to Lebanon and openly demanded that the Lebanese government and army disarm Hezbollah. Hezbollah responded strongly. Wafiq Safa, head of liaison and coordination for Hezbollah and one of the group’s top officials, emphasized in an interview that disarmament is not part of Hezbollah’s strategic roadmap and laid out conditions for it—conditions that are practically impossible to meet. Later, Leader Shaykh Naim Qassim made a significant speech declaring that anyone calling for disarmament of the resistance is serving the Israeli enemy free of charge.
Who is pushing for Hezbollah’s disarmament?
1. The United States:
The campaign is led by Morgan Ortagus, Vitkoff’s deputy and the new special U.S. envoy to the Middle East (replacing Amos Hochstein in Lebanon). She has visited Lebanon multiple times, openly declaring that her main goal is the dismantling of Lebanon’s resistance movement. Her efforts align with the U.S. strategy to alter Lebanon’s military-security equation by reshaping the political equation in Beirut.
2. March 14 Alliance:
This coalition of anti-Hezbollah Lebanese political groups has long sought ways to neutralize the resistance and sees the current moment as ideal. Figures like Samir Geagea, Ashraf Rifi, and members of the Hariri family are among its key actors.
3. Israel and the Current Syrian Regime:
Both Tel Aviv and the present ruling regime in Damascus, as external enemies of Hezbollah, seek to permanently end the movement’s power. This has led to repeated Israeli incursions into Lebanon for precisely that reason.
Possible Scenarios:
1. Civil War:
In this scenario, Hezbollah refuses to disarm, leading to heightened tensions. If the government and army attempt to disarm the movement by force, it could spark an all-out civil war.
2. Integration into the Army:
This is an unlikely option but has been floated by some in Lebanon—similar to the integration of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) into the military. President Aoun has already rejected it, and Hezbollah has shown no intention of accepting this either.
3. Status Quo Continues:
This is the most likely outcome. Hezbollah retains its weapons, including missiles and drones, while the Lebanese government refrains from attempting disarmament by force. Meanwhile, the responsibility for defending national sovereignty is gradually shifted toward the state itself.
What is Hezbollah’s strategy?
Following its intense war with Israel and the assassination of its commanders and officials, Lebanon’s resistance movement is undergoing a comprehensive rebuilding phase—restoring its military command, intelligence leadership, and political structure. Hezbollah aims to draw lessons from the recent war and rebuild its strength through a gradual recovery process that requires time.
For now, Hezbollah avoids escalating tensions and instead plans to focus on the political front, particularly the 2026 elections. It aims to secure key parliamentary seats and reassert its political influence—though this will be no easy task. Amid all these developments, the disarmament of Hezbollah remains the key flashpoint between the Western-backed factions and the resistance movement in Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch
❤24🙏5
🇾🇪 Breaking: U.S. warplanes launched a series of airstrikes across Yemen:
— Kamran Island in Al-Hodeidah Governorate was bombed multiple times.
— Al-Muhajar area in Haroob village, located in Al-Hosn city of Sana’a Governorate, was hit twice.
— Majzar city in Marib Governorate was also struck twice.
Al-Masirah reports escalating aggression as civilian areas continue to be targeted.
🔹@enemywatch
— Kamran Island in Al-Hodeidah Governorate was bombed multiple times.
— Al-Muhajar area in Haroob village, located in Al-Hosn city of Sana’a Governorate, was hit twice.
— Majzar city in Marib Governorate was also struck twice.
Al-Masirah reports escalating aggression as civilian areas continue to be targeted.
🔹@enemywatch
😡21
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇵🇸 Report: In a previous video from January 22, Pope Francis is seen making a phone call to the Holy Family Church in Gaza, speaking with Father Yusuf Asad and Father Gabriel Romanelli, checking on their conditions amidst the ongoing Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip.
Francis, who called for a ceasefire in Gaza and humanitarian aid access in his Easter message yesterday, passed away today at the age of 88.
🔹@enemywatch
Francis, who called for a ceasefire in Gaza and humanitarian aid access in his Easter message yesterday, passed away today at the age of 88.
🔹@enemywatch
❤19🙏1🕊1😡1
Enemy Watch — Official
🇵🇸 Report: In a previous video from January 22, Pope Francis is seen making a phone call to the Holy Family Church in Gaza, speaking with Father Yusuf Asad and Father Gabriel Romanelli, checking on their conditions amidst the ongoing Israeli genocide in the…
✅ | Got it confirmed—wanted to add it here: Pope Francis did additional supportive things for the Christians of Gaza and the people of Gaza collectively. Despite being trapped in the cage of the Vatican, he used his personal means to interact with local Christian Church leaders in Gaza and nearby areas, taking daily reports as much as he could in person. He also tried to help however he could from his imprisoned chair. This gesture was more—and far better—than the collective fatwa factories of the Arab traitor regimes, and indeed enough to make Salman and Erdoğan ashamed.
As a person, he was better than Sudais, the Muftis of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, and others who not only speak “for the cause” but in reality push falsehood (fasād), changing stances according to the Sultan’s will.
As said—despite being on a strangled, barbed ceremonial seat—Pope Francis, in person, chose this path. Most possibly, this very nature of his prompted Imam Khamenei’s stance—where he reminded the Pope that if Jesus (A) were present today, he would ache for Gaza and the super-oppressed masses. In past few years, Imam Khamenei (H) sent him three delegations on multiple occasions.
Whatever we don’t know about how he left the world—Allah is the best dealer of all.
🔹@enemywatch
As a person, he was better than Sudais, the Muftis of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, and others who not only speak “for the cause” but in reality push falsehood (fasād), changing stances according to the Sultan’s will.
As said—despite being on a strangled, barbed ceremonial seat—Pope Francis, in person, chose this path. Most possibly, this very nature of his prompted Imam Khamenei’s stance—where he reminded the Pope that if Jesus (A) were present today, he would ache for Gaza and the super-oppressed masses. In past few years, Imam Khamenei (H) sent him three delegations on multiple occasions.
Whatever we don’t know about how he left the world—Allah is the best dealer of all.
🔹@enemywatch
❤22🕊3💯1😡1
🇸🇾 Breaking: Terrorist forces loyal to Julani have arrested Khaled, head of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement in Syria, and Abu Ali Yasser, head of the organizing committee for the Syrian arena.
The arrests signal an escalating crackdown by HTS on Palestinian factions operating in Syria under the guise of “security operations.”
🔹@enemywatch
The arrests signal an escalating crackdown by HTS on Palestinian factions operating in Syria under the guise of “security operations.”
🔹@enemywatch
😡34😱4❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇵🇸 Report: A Palestinian prisoner from the Gaza Strip, newly released from Israeli occupation prisons, was shocked to learn that several members of his family had been martyred during the ongoing aggression.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
😭21💔10😱1
🇵🇸 Report: A heartbreaking scene in Gaza City—A young man was seen embracing the lifeless body of his 4-year-old sister, who was martyred in an Israeli airstrike.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💔46😭7😡2🕊1
🇱🇧 Breaking: An Israeli occupation drone strike targeted a vehicle in Baawerta, near Damour in Mount Lebanon, south of Beirut.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
😡21
Enemy Watch — Official
🇱🇧 Breaking: An Israeli occupation drone strike targeted a vehicle in Baawerta, near Damour in Mount Lebanon, south of Beirut. 🔹@enemywatch
🇱🇧 Breaking: Hussein Attawi (r), a senior military commander in the Islamic Group movement in Lebanon, was assassinated this morning in a targeted Israeli drone strike.
His vehicle was struck in Mount Lebanon province, in the heart of the country, according to an official statement issued by the group.
🔹@enemywatch
His vehicle was struck in Mount Lebanon province, in the heart of the country, according to an official statement issued by the group.
🔹@enemywatch
💔28😡4🕊1
Enemy Watch — Official
🇱🇧 Breaking: Hussein Attawi (r), a senior military commander in the Islamic Group movement in Lebanon, was assassinated this morning in a targeted Israeli drone strike. His vehicle was struck in Mount Lebanon province, in the heart of the country, according…
🇱🇧 Breaking: Statement from Jamaat-i Islami; Beirut:
In the Name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
“And never think that those who are killed in the cause of God are dead. Rather, they are alive with their Lord, receiving provision.”
Jamaat-i Islaami mourns the martyrdom of the academic and militant leader, Dr. Hussein Izzat Atwi, who was assassinated by a treacherous Israeli drone strike.
The attack targeted his vehicle as he traveled on the morning of Tuesday, April 22, 2025, from his home in the town of Bawarta to his workplace in Beirut.
The Islamic Group condemns this cowardly crime and holds the Zionist enemy fully responsible. The statement asks: “How long will this Zionist arrogance be allowed to tamper with the security of Lebanon and the Lebanese?”
Beirut | April 22, 2025
🔹@enemywatch
In the Name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
“And never think that those who are killed in the cause of God are dead. Rather, they are alive with their Lord, receiving provision.”
Jamaat-i Islaami mourns the martyrdom of the academic and militant leader, Dr. Hussein Izzat Atwi, who was assassinated by a treacherous Israeli drone strike.
The attack targeted his vehicle as he traveled on the morning of Tuesday, April 22, 2025, from his home in the town of Bawarta to his workplace in Beirut.
The Islamic Group condemns this cowardly crime and holds the Zionist enemy fully responsible. The statement asks: “How long will this Zionist arrogance be allowed to tamper with the security of Lebanon and the Lebanese?”
Beirut | April 22, 2025
🔹@enemywatch
❤15
🇸🇾 Report: In the early phase of the Israeli-led assault against anti-Zionist resistance factions, the Syrian regime—for serving america, israeli and regional traitors' interests—has intensified its crackdown on Palestinian resistance groups. Over recent months, the Syrian government has reportedly disclosed safe house locations, enabled Israeli airstrikes, and arrested multiple fighters from Saraya al-Quds and Al-Qassam Brigades.
Now, after a documented meeting between Julani and U.S. intelligence officials, the crackdown has escalated to target political officials from Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and Saraya al-Quds directly.
In a public statement, Saraya al-Quds called on the Syrian government to release their detained members. This campaign isn’t isolated. The assassination of Dr. Hussein Izzat Atwi (r), a senior commander from Lebanon’s Sunni Jamaat-e-Islami, and continued shelling near Shebaa Farms, point to a larger pattern of collaboration—where regimes like Syria’s are now clearly facilitating the silencing of Sunni resistance factions.
The narrative must change: this is not about sect or group loyalty—Shia or Sunni, Hezbollah or Amal, Iranian-backed or not—but about recognizing a systematic effort to dismantle all effective anti-Israel resistance units under the pretext of regional security.
Unless this collaboration is called out and confronted, the region risks being stripped of its final lines of defense.
🔹@enemywatch
Now, after a documented meeting between Julani and U.S. intelligence officials, the crackdown has escalated to target political officials from Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and Saraya al-Quds directly.
In a public statement, Saraya al-Quds called on the Syrian government to release their detained members. This campaign isn’t isolated. The assassination of Dr. Hussein Izzat Atwi (r), a senior commander from Lebanon’s Sunni Jamaat-e-Islami, and continued shelling near Shebaa Farms, point to a larger pattern of collaboration—where regimes like Syria’s are now clearly facilitating the silencing of Sunni resistance factions.
The narrative must change: this is not about sect or group loyalty—Shia or Sunni, Hezbollah or Amal, Iranian-backed or not—but about recognizing a systematic effort to dismantle all effective anti-Israel resistance units under the pretext of regional security.
Unless this collaboration is called out and confronted, the region risks being stripped of its final lines of defense.
🔹@enemywatch
💯16❤1
✅ | Latent losers, cowards who flee when exposed—takfiri admirers who seek covert terrorist faction formation, takeover, or massacre as caliphate. who—are just repeating: “Give Julani time, give him time?” These trans-creatures will flee from the ground. The same ones who daily spew support for the terrorist takeover and fragmentation of Syria, who celebrate its downfall as a victory for their version of Islam—where are they now, when the leaders of Palestinian resistance are being assaulted and arrested?
Until when will these people keep deceiving the simple-minded and hollow-hearted in the name of sects? They need to be crushed—like the traitors they are.
🔹@enemywatch
Until when will these people keep deceiving the simple-minded and hollow-hearted in the name of sects? They need to be crushed—like the traitors they are.
🔹@enemywatch
💯19
📕 | Imam Khamenei's (H) advices related to ethics on Cyber space: (1/3):
Virtual space has today become a serious and inseparable part of all our lives, encompassing many aspects of daily existence such as the economy, education, business, entertainment, and more. Therefore, strengthening and improving our engagement with it is absolutely necessary. As stated on March 22, 2020 by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Imam Khamenei:
“Today, virtual space governs the lives of people across the world, and many conduct all their affairs through it. Strength in this domain is vital.”
Like all chosen real-life arenas—such as marketplaces, universities, and stadiums—virtual space also comes with capacities, shortcomings, strengths, and vulnerabilities. We must discover a way of life in this new space, which expands daily, in order to shield ourselves from its dangers and benefit from it as much as possible.
Upholding ethics, maintaining courtesy, acting justly, and behaving rationally in virtual space is a crucial matter—more so now than ever before. The Leader also emphasized this during a meeting with guests of the Islamic Unity Conference and various officials of the Islamic Republic on October 24, 2021:
“Today, in virtual space, one sometimes witnesses blatant injustice: lies are told, slander is spread, unverified claims are made. These are all forms of injustice and should not happen. Anyone engaged in virtual space must be vigilant, and those who control virtual platforms must exercise even greater care to prevent such actions.
We must learn—and make it a habit—to interact with people justly. Even if you dislike someone and reject their views, that’s your right—it may even be a valid opinion—but it must not be contaminated with slander, lies, or insults. That kind of contamination is deeply harmful. This, too, is a matter of justice.”
From an ethical perspective, justice as a malakah (stable trait) is a firm state whereby one avoids sin. In Islamic jurisprudence, this justice is a required condition for roles such as the prayer leader (imam), judge (qadi), and witness (shahid). Thus, justice in virtual space means continual self-discipline that keeps a person away from both major and minor sins.
🔹@enemywatch
+
Virtual space has today become a serious and inseparable part of all our lives, encompassing many aspects of daily existence such as the economy, education, business, entertainment, and more. Therefore, strengthening and improving our engagement with it is absolutely necessary. As stated on March 22, 2020 by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Imam Khamenei:
“Today, virtual space governs the lives of people across the world, and many conduct all their affairs through it. Strength in this domain is vital.”
Like all chosen real-life arenas—such as marketplaces, universities, and stadiums—virtual space also comes with capacities, shortcomings, strengths, and vulnerabilities. We must discover a way of life in this new space, which expands daily, in order to shield ourselves from its dangers and benefit from it as much as possible.
Upholding ethics, maintaining courtesy, acting justly, and behaving rationally in virtual space is a crucial matter—more so now than ever before. The Leader also emphasized this during a meeting with guests of the Islamic Unity Conference and various officials of the Islamic Republic on October 24, 2021:
“Today, in virtual space, one sometimes witnesses blatant injustice: lies are told, slander is spread, unverified claims are made. These are all forms of injustice and should not happen. Anyone engaged in virtual space must be vigilant, and those who control virtual platforms must exercise even greater care to prevent such actions.
We must learn—and make it a habit—to interact with people justly. Even if you dislike someone and reject their views, that’s your right—it may even be a valid opinion—but it must not be contaminated with slander, lies, or insults. That kind of contamination is deeply harmful. This, too, is a matter of justice.”
From an ethical perspective, justice as a malakah (stable trait) is a firm state whereby one avoids sin. In Islamic jurisprudence, this justice is a required condition for roles such as the prayer leader (imam), judge (qadi), and witness (shahid). Thus, justice in virtual space means continual self-discipline that keeps a person away from both major and minor sins.
🔹@enemywatch
+
🤝7
🌎 | Virtual Space with Cultural and Ethical Attachments: (1/2):
In Islamic societies, the way people behave with one another has always been of great importance. For centuries, ethical scholars have taught the etiquette of social interaction through moral treatises—using prose, poetry, sermons, and stories to illustrate the many forms of human relationships and to instruct on ethical conduct in both social and personal dealings. Today, with the vast expansion of human communication in virtual space, this issue has gained even more significance. Enlightened scholars strive to extend the path of hayat tayyibah—a pure, wholesome life—into every dimension of human existence.
From the perspective of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, virtual space is a double-edged sword: it can become either a blessing or a curse. This view, while embracing modern technology, also stresses the necessity of accompanying cultural and ethical frameworks. It is a mindset that measures proper conduct in virtual space according to moral standards and just behavior.
According to the Leader:
“Virtual space has become a real part of people’s lives.”
This space requires both managerial responsibility from the authorities and taqwa (God-consciousness) and just behavior from individuals. With concern, he addressed the moral dangers that have spread in society and also provided the remedy:
“Now in virtual space, it has become common—almost routine—for people to speak ill of one another, for this one to slander that one, to amplify minor weaknesses, to ruin the reputation of believers without it even being clear who is doing it. Well, this is a very bad thing. Among our youth, such things exist and they must be curbed; this is possible through spiritual education.”
(June 10, 2018)
🔹@enemywatch
+
In Islamic societies, the way people behave with one another has always been of great importance. For centuries, ethical scholars have taught the etiquette of social interaction through moral treatises—using prose, poetry, sermons, and stories to illustrate the many forms of human relationships and to instruct on ethical conduct in both social and personal dealings. Today, with the vast expansion of human communication in virtual space, this issue has gained even more significance. Enlightened scholars strive to extend the path of hayat tayyibah—a pure, wholesome life—into every dimension of human existence.
From the perspective of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, virtual space is a double-edged sword: it can become either a blessing or a curse. This view, while embracing modern technology, also stresses the necessity of accompanying cultural and ethical frameworks. It is a mindset that measures proper conduct in virtual space according to moral standards and just behavior.
According to the Leader:
“Virtual space has become a real part of people’s lives.”
This space requires both managerial responsibility from the authorities and taqwa (God-consciousness) and just behavior from individuals. With concern, he addressed the moral dangers that have spread in society and also provided the remedy:
“Now in virtual space, it has become common—almost routine—for people to speak ill of one another, for this one to slander that one, to amplify minor weaknesses, to ruin the reputation of believers without it even being clear who is doing it. Well, this is a very bad thing. Among our youth, such things exist and they must be curbed; this is possible through spiritual education.”
(June 10, 2018)
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤5🤝3
🎥 | Ethics Is Not Optional: Imam Khamenei (H): (3/3):
The internet and social media platforms—like all phenomena—have both positive and negative consequences. With proper planning and by raising public awareness, we can benefit from their positive outcomes while minimizing the harms.
The ease of access, speed, and volume of dissemination are key features of this space, which can serve as a platform for faithful revolutionary youth and Hezbollah-type individuals to engage in clarification (tabyīn) and the promotion of Islamic and revolutionary values. This is a crucial duty that the Leader of the Islamic Revolution has repeatedly emphasized, calling for the breaking of the enemy’s propaganda siege through proper management of virtual space. Undoubtedly, one of the unparalleled capacities of cyberspace is its use in fulfilling the jihad of clarification, as Imam Khamenei stated:
“You can spread correct and sound ideas. You can respond to doubts and ambiguities in this space using these tools, and you can truly engage in jihad in this field.”
(September 27, 2021)
However, in a space where some actors enter the virtual world with psychological warfare techniques and have no qualms about deception and media trickery—using unethical methods like rumor-spreading, lying, slandering individuals, or manipulating people’s reputations—can one respond in kind? Can unethical or unjust tactics be used in the name of clarification? Can the necessity of promoting values justify crossing ethical boundaries?
Imam Khamenei answered these questions clearly:
“One must certainly follow ethical methods in this work. What some people do in virtual space, or in newspapers, articles, and here and there—responding to public opinion with insults, slander, deception, and lies—must be strongly avoided. Truth must be conveyed with strong reasoning, sound speech, full rationality, adorned with human emotions and the use of ethics.”
(September 27, 2021)
From this perspective, young, faithful revolutionaries must observe sharʿī (Islamic legal) responsibility in their online conduct. They must not, out of concern for defending ideals, abandon fairness or ridicule and humiliate others with improper language. Nor should they, under the pretext of ideological disagreement, expose personal or family matters or unproven accusations. For as the Leader firmly warned:
“If in the name of justice-seeking and revolutionary activism we trample over ethics, then we have caused harm; we have deviated from the path of Imam [Khomeini]. If, in the name of being revolutionary or justice-seeking, we insult and harm our brothers—those who may disagree with us intellectually but who believe in the system and in Islam—then we have deviated from the Imam’s line. ‘Let not the hatred of a people lead you to be unjust. Be just: that is nearer to taqwa (piety).’ (Qur’an 5:8)”
(June 4, 2011)
Alongside encouragement for the use of virtual space and a careful assessment of its dangers, Imam Khamenei has emphasized proper, ethical usage. From the standpoint of forbidding wrong, he has warned about common sins in this space—like lying, slander, mockery, and character assassination—and from the position of enjoining right, he has advised active users:
“Use virtual space to inspire hope, to recommend patience, to call to truth, to raise awareness, and to advise against laziness, passivity, and idleness.”
(March 11, 2021)
With this logic, the presence of the faithful revolutionary community in virtual space can be described as a learned presence with just behavior, whose continued engagement will reflect the rich culture of Islamic Iran and strengthen the identity, values, conduct, and lifestyle of the general population.
🔹@enemywatch
The internet and social media platforms—like all phenomena—have both positive and negative consequences. With proper planning and by raising public awareness, we can benefit from their positive outcomes while minimizing the harms.
The ease of access, speed, and volume of dissemination are key features of this space, which can serve as a platform for faithful revolutionary youth and Hezbollah-type individuals to engage in clarification (tabyīn) and the promotion of Islamic and revolutionary values. This is a crucial duty that the Leader of the Islamic Revolution has repeatedly emphasized, calling for the breaking of the enemy’s propaganda siege through proper management of virtual space. Undoubtedly, one of the unparalleled capacities of cyberspace is its use in fulfilling the jihad of clarification, as Imam Khamenei stated:
“You can spread correct and sound ideas. You can respond to doubts and ambiguities in this space using these tools, and you can truly engage in jihad in this field.”
(September 27, 2021)
However, in a space where some actors enter the virtual world with psychological warfare techniques and have no qualms about deception and media trickery—using unethical methods like rumor-spreading, lying, slandering individuals, or manipulating people’s reputations—can one respond in kind? Can unethical or unjust tactics be used in the name of clarification? Can the necessity of promoting values justify crossing ethical boundaries?
Imam Khamenei answered these questions clearly:
“One must certainly follow ethical methods in this work. What some people do in virtual space, or in newspapers, articles, and here and there—responding to public opinion with insults, slander, deception, and lies—must be strongly avoided. Truth must be conveyed with strong reasoning, sound speech, full rationality, adorned with human emotions and the use of ethics.”
(September 27, 2021)
From this perspective, young, faithful revolutionaries must observe sharʿī (Islamic legal) responsibility in their online conduct. They must not, out of concern for defending ideals, abandon fairness or ridicule and humiliate others with improper language. Nor should they, under the pretext of ideological disagreement, expose personal or family matters or unproven accusations. For as the Leader firmly warned:
“If in the name of justice-seeking and revolutionary activism we trample over ethics, then we have caused harm; we have deviated from the path of Imam [Khomeini]. If, in the name of being revolutionary or justice-seeking, we insult and harm our brothers—those who may disagree with us intellectually but who believe in the system and in Islam—then we have deviated from the Imam’s line. ‘Let not the hatred of a people lead you to be unjust. Be just: that is nearer to taqwa (piety).’ (Qur’an 5:8)”
(June 4, 2011)
Alongside encouragement for the use of virtual space and a careful assessment of its dangers, Imam Khamenei has emphasized proper, ethical usage. From the standpoint of forbidding wrong, he has warned about common sins in this space—like lying, slander, mockery, and character assassination—and from the position of enjoining right, he has advised active users:
“Use virtual space to inspire hope, to recommend patience, to call to truth, to raise awareness, and to advise against laziness, passivity, and idleness.”
(March 11, 2021)
With this logic, the presence of the faithful revolutionary community in virtual space can be described as a learned presence with just behavior, whose continued engagement will reflect the rich culture of Islamic Iran and strengthen the identity, values, conduct, and lifestyle of the general population.
🔹@enemywatch
❤9🙏4
✅ | Public Notice:
All contents shared by us are open for public use. You are free to copy, paste, share, or republish them without hesitation. We impose no restrictions on distribution.
Edits, omissions, and rearrangements for the sake of clarity, brevity, or relevance are acceptable if they serve the cause — however, the core message and ideas must not be twisted, distorted, or reshaped.
You are welcome to reproduce the content anywhere, including in your own channels or platforms, even with our channel name removed. We raise no objection to republication in that form.
Thank you!
🔹@enemywatch
All contents shared by us are open for public use. You are free to copy, paste, share, or republish them without hesitation. We impose no restrictions on distribution.
Edits, omissions, and rearrangements for the sake of clarity, brevity, or relevance are acceptable if they serve the cause — however, the core message and ideas must not be twisted, distorted, or reshaped.
You are welcome to reproduce the content anywhere, including in your own channels or platforms, even with our channel name removed. We raise no objection to republication in that form.
Thank you!
🔹@enemywatch
❤45🙏6💯2
❎ Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam, are you a man? A human, or a controlled robot? Why do you keep changing sides on your chairs with no steps, while every day, the most important people of your nations are being killed by Israelis in broad daylight?
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯28🙏3