📕 | The Rock Inscription of Hubb ʿAlī
Discovered in Madinah | Found: November, 2021:
Around four years ago, Saudi archaeologists uncovered a remarkable inscription etched into a desert rock near Madinah.
The most convincing interpretation is this:
It was inscribed during the early Islamic era — possibly while Prophet Muhammad (ṣallā Allāhu ʿalayhi wa ālih) was still present. The script reads:
حُبُّ علي بن أبي طالب حقٌّ علينا ومن الواجب
“The love of ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib is a truth upon us — and an obligation.”
This message of devotion is especially significant, as other inscriptions in the area have been dated to around 8–9 AH, placing it firmly within the Prophet’s lifetime.
It stands as one of the earliest material affirmations of love and loyalty to Imām ʿAlī (ʿalayhi al-salām).
1. “Loving ʿAlī is a sign of faith”
The Prophet (ṣ):
“O ʿAlī, no one loves you except a believer, and no one hates you except a hypocrite.”
— Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Book of Faith, 1:86, ḥadīth no. 78
Also found in Sunan al-Tirmidhī and Musnad Aḥmad
2. ʿAlī’s love is obligatory and tied to Paradise
The Prophet (ṣ) said:
“Whoever loves ʿAlī has loved me, and whoever loves me has loved Allah. And whoever hates ʿAlī has hated me, and whoever hates me has hated Allah.”
— Musnad Aḥmad, 5:419, also in al-Ṭabarānī (al-Awsaṭ and al-Kabīr)
3. Loving ʿAlī leads to Paradise
From Umm Salama (S):
The Prophet (ṣ) said: “Whoever reviles ʿAlī has reviled me, and whoever reviles me has reviled Allah.”
— al-Mustadrak by al-Ḥākim, 3:130
Classified as ṣaḥīḥ al-isnād by al-Ḥākim and al-Dhahabī
4. ʿAlī is with the truth, and truth is with him
The Prophet (ṣ) said:
“ʿAlī is with the truth, and the truth is with ʿAlī.”
— al-Mustadrak 3:134, al-Ṭabarānī in al-Kabīr, and others
Declared ṣaḥīḥ by numerous Sunni scholars
#History
🔹@enemywatch
Discovered in Madinah | Found: November, 2021:
Around four years ago, Saudi archaeologists uncovered a remarkable inscription etched into a desert rock near Madinah.
The most convincing interpretation is this:
It was inscribed during the early Islamic era — possibly while Prophet Muhammad (ṣallā Allāhu ʿalayhi wa ālih) was still present. The script reads:
حُبُّ علي بن أبي طالب حقٌّ علينا ومن الواجب
“The love of ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib is a truth upon us — and an obligation.”
This message of devotion is especially significant, as other inscriptions in the area have been dated to around 8–9 AH, placing it firmly within the Prophet’s lifetime.
It stands as one of the earliest material affirmations of love and loyalty to Imām ʿAlī (ʿalayhi al-salām).
1. “Loving ʿAlī is a sign of faith”
The Prophet (ṣ):
“O ʿAlī, no one loves you except a believer, and no one hates you except a hypocrite.”
— Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Book of Faith, 1:86, ḥadīth no. 78
Also found in Sunan al-Tirmidhī and Musnad Aḥmad
2. ʿAlī’s love is obligatory and tied to Paradise
The Prophet (ṣ) said:
“Whoever loves ʿAlī has loved me, and whoever loves me has loved Allah. And whoever hates ʿAlī has hated me, and whoever hates me has hated Allah.”
— Musnad Aḥmad, 5:419, also in al-Ṭabarānī (al-Awsaṭ and al-Kabīr)
3. Loving ʿAlī leads to Paradise
From Umm Salama (S):
The Prophet (ṣ) said: “Whoever reviles ʿAlī has reviled me, and whoever reviles me has reviled Allah.”
— al-Mustadrak by al-Ḥākim, 3:130
Classified as ṣaḥīḥ al-isnād by al-Ḥākim and al-Dhahabī
4. ʿAlī is with the truth, and truth is with him
The Prophet (ṣ) said:
“ʿAlī is with the truth, and the truth is with ʿAlī.”
— al-Mustadrak 3:134, al-Ṭabarānī in al-Kabīr, and others
Declared ṣaḥīḥ by numerous Sunni scholars
#History
🔹@enemywatch
❤23
🇨🇳 Report: China, so far, rejects any talks with America despite Trump officials proposing and requesting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to meet with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🔥23
✅ | Jaysh al-Islam, a jihadist terrorist group linked to the Alloush dynasty (formerly Saudi-backed), has seized control of Douma, Al-Qaryatayn, and much of the southern and Badiya regions. This move comes after a power vacuum left by the 8th Brigade of Ahmed al-Awda. Julani does not control all of Syria. His influence is mainly limited to Damascus, parts of Hama, Aleppo, and the coastal region. That is why the Western powers are hesitant to fully support Julani, fearing that he or his faction might eventually be overtaken by other groups or gangs.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🔥12💯1😭1
🇾🇪 Breaking: Yemeni Armed Forces Statement:
The Yemeni Armed Forces announced the execution of multiple coordinated military operations:
1. Against Israeli Targets
• An operation targeted a vital Israeli installation in the occupied Ashkelon region using a Yaffa drone.
• A second strike targeted a military site in Umm al-Rashrash (southern occupied Palestine) with a Sammad-1 drone.
2. Response to U.S. Aggression
• In retaliation for recent U.S. attacks, including the massacre in Sana’a that resulted in dozens of deaths and injuries, the Yemeni forces carried out two additional operations:
• First Operation: Targeted the USS Truman aircraft carrier and its escort units in the northern Red Sea with two cruise missiles and two drones.
• Second Operation: A joint offensive by the naval, missile, and air forces against the USS Vinson and its warships in the Arabian Sea, using three cruise missiles and four drones.
The Armed Forces claim that all operations successfully achieved their objectives, attributing the outcomes to divine assistance.
🔹@enemywatch
The Yemeni Armed Forces announced the execution of multiple coordinated military operations:
1. Against Israeli Targets
• An operation targeted a vital Israeli installation in the occupied Ashkelon region using a Yaffa drone.
• A second strike targeted a military site in Umm al-Rashrash (southern occupied Palestine) with a Sammad-1 drone.
2. Response to U.S. Aggression
• In retaliation for recent U.S. attacks, including the massacre in Sana’a that resulted in dozens of deaths and injuries, the Yemeni forces carried out two additional operations:
• First Operation: Targeted the USS Truman aircraft carrier and its escort units in the northern Red Sea with two cruise missiles and two drones.
• Second Operation: A joint offensive by the naval, missile, and air forces against the USS Vinson and its warships in the Arabian Sea, using three cruise missiles and four drones.
The Armed Forces claim that all operations successfully achieved their objectives, attributing the outcomes to divine assistance.
🔹@enemywatch
❤18🔥5🤝2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇵🇸 Report: The Al-Qassam Brigades have released footage of the “Breaking the Sword” ambush, targeting enemy forces near the separation fence east of Beit Hanoun, in northern Gaza. The operation reportedly inflicted direct hits, with scenes showing the detonation of explosive devices and the targeting of advancing Israeli units.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
30🔥28🤝2❤1😱1
🇵🇸 Breaking: In the past 24 hours, 39 martyrs and 69 injured have arrived at hospitals across Gaza amid ongoing Israeli bombardment.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
😭10💔2🕊1
🇵🇸 Breaking: A major and serious operation was carried out against Israeli occupation forces in northern Gaza. Details are still emerging, but resistance sources describe the event as one of the most significant blows dealt to the IOF in recent days, involving complex tactics and high-impact strikes.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤33🔥3
Forwarded from Basira Press
✝️ Pope Francis has died — Vatican
The Pope that normalized LGBT, endorsed ecumenism (we're all for respect between religions and unity, but not to the point of saying there is no objective truth), lukewarm humanitarian positions on Zionism and Gaza, and many other positions which defy Christian and divine values, is no more.
Now, we differ from the Jewish supremacists who often spew hate at the Catholic Church, because no matter how much the Vatican bends the knee for liberalism and Zionism, they will never forgive the fact that the Catholic Church held on to the historical fact that the Jews were the one who demanded the Romans allow them to crucify him, until 1965 when they made it their official position that the Romans did it. Despite this capitulation, the grudge still stands.
That's why Hollywood makes movies about Catholic child molestation but never about rabbinical child molestation. There was one movie where a journalist was intrepidly digging and going deep to find out about priestly child abuse, but when he was put on a different assignment to cover a story related to the 9/11 hijackers, he uncritically followed the official story and didn't investigate the dancing "israelis" despite mainstream media reporting on them in the early days before the story was buried permanently, nor question any other aspect of the official story. Isn't that something?
However, that aside, Catholics should look in the mirror. Many successive popes have sold out divine values in exchange for liberalism, humanism, and globalism. They rub elbows with the enemies of Jesus Christ, namely the Zionist Jews. If the head of the religion is a sellout of your own values, is there a point to remain?
These days, it is not so difficult to be "more Catholic than the pope," since the Pope is not very Catholic. Whether traditional Catholics like our colleague E. Michael Jones or famous filmmaker Mel Gibson, the rank and file of the church often do a better job than the leading clerics who sit in Vatican City with an enormous amount of wealth that is not used to support the needy and the poor like Jesus would do with it.
There are other Christian sects which are more in line with divine values and have not bent the knee to liberalism, such as Orthodox Christianity, with the exception of the Greek patriarchate, who is famous for being hand-in-glove with the CIA. And in fairness, Catholicism even in its current state is way better than Protestantism, the birthplace of Christian Zionism, dispensationalism, and the Scofield Bible.
In contrast, for us we don't have such a dilemma. Imam Khomeini, Imam Khamenei, and even martyred president Raisi all had simple lives and did not have lavish personal belongings like mansions, despite all the wealth and power of a strong and resource-rich nation like Iran at their fingertips. They practice what they preach and live like the prophets did. That is the sign of a person who is truly with the divine.
The Pope that normalized LGBT, endorsed ecumenism (we're all for respect between religions and unity, but not to the point of saying there is no objective truth), lukewarm humanitarian positions on Zionism and Gaza, and many other positions which defy Christian and divine values, is no more.
Now, we differ from the Jewish supremacists who often spew hate at the Catholic Church, because no matter how much the Vatican bends the knee for liberalism and Zionism, they will never forgive the fact that the Catholic Church held on to the historical fact that the Jews were the one who demanded the Romans allow them to crucify him, until 1965 when they made it their official position that the Romans did it. Despite this capitulation, the grudge still stands.
That's why Hollywood makes movies about Catholic child molestation but never about rabbinical child molestation. There was one movie where a journalist was intrepidly digging and going deep to find out about priestly child abuse, but when he was put on a different assignment to cover a story related to the 9/11 hijackers, he uncritically followed the official story and didn't investigate the dancing "israelis" despite mainstream media reporting on them in the early days before the story was buried permanently, nor question any other aspect of the official story. Isn't that something?
However, that aside, Catholics should look in the mirror. Many successive popes have sold out divine values in exchange for liberalism, humanism, and globalism. They rub elbows with the enemies of Jesus Christ, namely the Zionist Jews. If the head of the religion is a sellout of your own values, is there a point to remain?
These days, it is not so difficult to be "more Catholic than the pope," since the Pope is not very Catholic. Whether traditional Catholics like our colleague E. Michael Jones or famous filmmaker Mel Gibson, the rank and file of the church often do a better job than the leading clerics who sit in Vatican City with an enormous amount of wealth that is not used to support the needy and the poor like Jesus would do with it.
There are other Christian sects which are more in line with divine values and have not bent the knee to liberalism, such as Orthodox Christianity, with the exception of the Greek patriarchate, who is famous for being hand-in-glove with the CIA. And in fairness, Catholicism even in its current state is way better than Protestantism, the birthplace of Christian Zionism, dispensationalism, and the Scofield Bible.
In contrast, for us we don't have such a dilemma. Imam Khomeini, Imam Khamenei, and even martyred president Raisi all had simple lives and did not have lavish personal belongings like mansions, despite all the wealth and power of a strong and resource-rich nation like Iran at their fingertips. They practice what they preach and live like the prophets did. That is the sign of a person who is truly with the divine.
❤24💯3😡2
✅ | Both Hamas and Hezbollah issued condolences on the passing of the Pope as part of their social duties, which is commendable. Both groups have Christian supporters, and many of these Christians accept the Pope as their spiritual authority. However, the death of the Pope and the general situation of the Vatican have always received mixed reactions. Some celebrate, some mock, some remain indifferent, and others reject it ideologically.
The Vatican has issued vague and inconsistent statements regarding Gaza—statements that often whitewash the reality on the ground, including the suffering of both Muslims and Christians. The Vatican has needed reforms for centuries, yet in recent decades its role has been controversial, scandal-ridden, and increasingly questionable—whether in the case of Emanuela Orlandi or other domestic failures. Even within Italy, it has failed to defend Christianity or preserve moral values in the face of America’s cultural decline: the spread of LGBTQ propaganda, anti-natalism, incest normalization, and other destructive trends. The Vatican, in reality, has been more ceremonial than functional.
People are naturally affected when a popular religious or cultural figure dies. But such individuals must be judged by principles—not like the Wahhabis who cheer at any death that doesn’t align with their Taymiyyah-distorted ideology of takfir (declaring others unbelievers). The proper metric should be whether someone stood—even partially—against the claws of arrogant Zionism, not just in words but through concrete action.
Some argue, “At least the Pope spoke up for Gaza, which Arab leaders didn’t.” But two points must be made: First, Arab leaders also made statements—and the talking points of both were likely scripted by the same agencies. Second, neither the Vatican nor those Arab states took any meaningful steps to fight the occupation—an occupation that has displaced and massacred native Christians in Gaza and the West Bank. If someone asks, “What could they have done?”—that itself is a flawed question. They could have done something, had they truly upheld the teachings of the son of Maryam (ʿalayhi al-salām). Peace without justice often ends in pieces.
Not just Pope Francis, but his predecessors too failed to raise a consistent voice against Israeli apartheid and occupation. Instead, they became tools serving American geopolitical interests.
We must not write in praise of such institutions merely due to peer pressure. The Vatican, as the spiritual head of over a billion followers, should have taken bold and principled stances—beyond symbolic gestures. Pope Francis had a few commendable moments: he welcomed delegations from Imam Khamenei and figures from the Islamic Republic. However, this cannot whitewash the Vatican’s failure to act against Zionism, Judaization, and the occupation of Palestine—or even to safeguard basic human and ethical values.
Allah alone knows best, and He is the One who knows all and sees all.
🔹@enemywatch
The Vatican has issued vague and inconsistent statements regarding Gaza—statements that often whitewash the reality on the ground, including the suffering of both Muslims and Christians. The Vatican has needed reforms for centuries, yet in recent decades its role has been controversial, scandal-ridden, and increasingly questionable—whether in the case of Emanuela Orlandi or other domestic failures. Even within Italy, it has failed to defend Christianity or preserve moral values in the face of America’s cultural decline: the spread of LGBTQ propaganda, anti-natalism, incest normalization, and other destructive trends. The Vatican, in reality, has been more ceremonial than functional.
People are naturally affected when a popular religious or cultural figure dies. But such individuals must be judged by principles—not like the Wahhabis who cheer at any death that doesn’t align with their Taymiyyah-distorted ideology of takfir (declaring others unbelievers). The proper metric should be whether someone stood—even partially—against the claws of arrogant Zionism, not just in words but through concrete action.
Some argue, “At least the Pope spoke up for Gaza, which Arab leaders didn’t.” But two points must be made: First, Arab leaders also made statements—and the talking points of both were likely scripted by the same agencies. Second, neither the Vatican nor those Arab states took any meaningful steps to fight the occupation—an occupation that has displaced and massacred native Christians in Gaza and the West Bank. If someone asks, “What could they have done?”—that itself is a flawed question. They could have done something, had they truly upheld the teachings of the son of Maryam (ʿalayhi al-salām). Peace without justice often ends in pieces.
Not just Pope Francis, but his predecessors too failed to raise a consistent voice against Israeli apartheid and occupation. Instead, they became tools serving American geopolitical interests.
We must not write in praise of such institutions merely due to peer pressure. The Vatican, as the spiritual head of over a billion followers, should have taken bold and principled stances—beyond symbolic gestures. Pope Francis had a few commendable moments: he welcomed delegations from Imam Khamenei and figures from the Islamic Republic. However, this cannot whitewash the Vatican’s failure to act against Zionism, Judaization, and the occupation of Palestine—or even to safeguard basic human and ethical values.
Allah alone knows best, and He is the One who knows all and sees all.
🔹@enemywatch
💯11🤝7😡1
🏴 | Kashmir Mourns the Loss of Allama Agha Syed Baqir (r) (1940–2025)
Kashmir has lost one of its most revered religious figures with the passing of Allama Agha Syed Baqir—a distinguished Islamic scholar, jurist, author, and the senior-most member of the respected Agha family of Budgam. The Agha family holds a central place in the religious, socio-political, and cultural fabric of Kashmiri Muslims, known for their leadership and commitment to faith and service.
Born on March 21, 1940, Allama Baqir began his foundational religious education at Babul Ilm, Budgam, under the guidance of his elders. His quest for deeper knowledge led him to the Hawza ʿIlmiyya of Najaf al-Ashraf in Iraq, one of the most prestigious centers of Shia Islamic learning. He spent years immersed in study and spiritual refinement before returning to Kashmir in 1982. From that point on, he actively took up the mantle of leadership and continued the religious mission of his forefathers—particularly in the footsteps of his esteemed ancestor, Agha Syed Yusuf al-Moosavi al-Safavi (r).
Allama Baqir was widely respected for his profound scholarship, spiritual depth, and firm ethical convictions. Fluent in Arabic, Persian, and Kashmiri, he was not only a scholar but also a poet, author, and orator, inspiring generations of students and followers. His sermons, writings, and poetic compositions carried deep theological weight.
Fatiha!
🔹@enemywatch
Kashmir has lost one of its most revered religious figures with the passing of Allama Agha Syed Baqir—a distinguished Islamic scholar, jurist, author, and the senior-most member of the respected Agha family of Budgam. The Agha family holds a central place in the religious, socio-political, and cultural fabric of Kashmiri Muslims, known for their leadership and commitment to faith and service.
Born on March 21, 1940, Allama Baqir began his foundational religious education at Babul Ilm, Budgam, under the guidance of his elders. His quest for deeper knowledge led him to the Hawza ʿIlmiyya of Najaf al-Ashraf in Iraq, one of the most prestigious centers of Shia Islamic learning. He spent years immersed in study and spiritual refinement before returning to Kashmir in 1982. From that point on, he actively took up the mantle of leadership and continued the religious mission of his forefathers—particularly in the footsteps of his esteemed ancestor, Agha Syed Yusuf al-Moosavi al-Safavi (r).
Allama Baqir was widely respected for his profound scholarship, spiritual depth, and firm ethical convictions. Fluent in Arabic, Persian, and Kashmiri, he was not only a scholar but also a poet, author, and orator, inspiring generations of students and followers. His sermons, writings, and poetic compositions carried deep theological weight.
Fatiha!
🔹@enemywatch
❤16😭6🙏2💔1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🟢 Report | Martyr Izz El-Din Al-Qassam Brigades:
“Strike With Your Staff” – A new release performed by the Military Choir of the Al-Qassam Brigades.
🔹@enemywatch
“Strike With Your Staff” – A new release performed by the Military Choir of the Al-Qassam Brigades.
🔹@enemywatch
❤14🙏2🔥1
Forwarded from NEW WORLD ORDYR 313 (0 EIE)
🇮🇶🇻🇦 | Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Sistani, Shi’a Islam's highest authority in Iraq, offered his condolences on Monday for the death of Pope Francis, praising his work promoting "peace and tolerance."
🟡 @NEWWORLDORDYR | Mirror Channel
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤19😡1
🇸🇾 | Rebranded Terrorist Julani Dines with U.S. Masters While Syrians Starve:
As Syria reels under relentless economic collapse, rebranded terrorist Julani—the former al-Qaeda commander turned Western media darling—continues posing for photo ops with his American masters. While families in Idlib and beyond are skipping meals, Julani walks red carpets laid out by think tanks and intelligence cut-outs eager to polish his image as a “local leader” or “counterterrorism partner.”
Today; In Damascus, this terrorist hosted U.S. Congressman Marlin Stutzman at the Presidential Palace—another signal of the hollow theater where foreign players praise “resilience” while Syrians are being economically crushed.
Today, the price of a single loaf of bread is 4,000 Syrian pounds. For a family of five, that’s three loaves daily—12,000 SYP a day or 360,000 SYP per month. Add basic transport to and from work: 4,000 SYP daily, 160,000 SYP per month. That’s 520,000 SYP just for bread and transport—while the average salary is only 300,000 SYP.
Syrians are working only to afford the ride to work. Food, electricity, medicine—all are luxuries. They live on borrowed money and unpaid bills.
And yet, under Julani’s HTS rule, thousands are fired from jobs, new taxes are imposed, and entire properties are seized under the guise of security or “Shari‘a courts.” Those who protest are jailed, tortured, or quietly disappeared. Humanitarian aid is blocked or politicized, allowed only through HTS-controlled channels that demand allegiance in return for survival.
Julani’s apologists who smoke weed in the name of caliphate or whatever they think; 'the mossad sponsored Sharia eutopia' from Bangladesh or Pakistan or Netherlands blame sanctions, but starvation, property confiscation, kidnappings, targeted killings, and brutal sectarian crackdowns have nothing to do with external embargoes. These are the tools of a mafia-state.
Julani’s transition—from a blacklisted terrorist to a necktie-wearing “governor” of Idlib to self claimed President—has been engineered not by reform, but by Western intelligence services and media laundering. The man responsible for massacres, sectarian cleansing, and the silencing of dissent is now used to serve geopolitical interests at the cost of Syrian blood.
The world may buy the PR. Syrians, especially those in the bread lines, do not.
🔹@enemywatch
As Syria reels under relentless economic collapse, rebranded terrorist Julani—the former al-Qaeda commander turned Western media darling—continues posing for photo ops with his American masters. While families in Idlib and beyond are skipping meals, Julani walks red carpets laid out by think tanks and intelligence cut-outs eager to polish his image as a “local leader” or “counterterrorism partner.”
Today; In Damascus, this terrorist hosted U.S. Congressman Marlin Stutzman at the Presidential Palace—another signal of the hollow theater where foreign players praise “resilience” while Syrians are being economically crushed.
Today, the price of a single loaf of bread is 4,000 Syrian pounds. For a family of five, that’s three loaves daily—12,000 SYP a day or 360,000 SYP per month. Add basic transport to and from work: 4,000 SYP daily, 160,000 SYP per month. That’s 520,000 SYP just for bread and transport—while the average salary is only 300,000 SYP.
Syrians are working only to afford the ride to work. Food, electricity, medicine—all are luxuries. They live on borrowed money and unpaid bills.
And yet, under Julani’s HTS rule, thousands are fired from jobs, new taxes are imposed, and entire properties are seized under the guise of security or “Shari‘a courts.” Those who protest are jailed, tortured, or quietly disappeared. Humanitarian aid is blocked or politicized, allowed only through HTS-controlled channels that demand allegiance in return for survival.
Julani’s apologists who smoke weed in the name of caliphate or whatever they think; 'the mossad sponsored Sharia eutopia' from Bangladesh or Pakistan or Netherlands blame sanctions, but starvation, property confiscation, kidnappings, targeted killings, and brutal sectarian crackdowns have nothing to do with external embargoes. These are the tools of a mafia-state.
Julani’s transition—from a blacklisted terrorist to a necktie-wearing “governor” of Idlib to self claimed President—has been engineered not by reform, but by Western intelligence services and media laundering. The man responsible for massacres, sectarian cleansing, and the silencing of dissent is now used to serve geopolitical interests at the cost of Syrian blood.
The world may buy the PR. Syrians, especially those in the bread lines, do not.
🔹@enemywatch
😡15❤1
🇱🇧 | Is Disarming Hezbollah Possible?
In recent months, following the ceasefire between Lebanon and israeli entity, considerable debate has arisen over Hezbollah’s weapons and the broader resistance movement in Lebanon, sparking widespread controversy. When Joseph Aoun, the President of Lebanon, stated that weapons should only be in the hands of the army, it caused a major uproar across Lebanese political circles.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump’s special representative on Lebanese affairs, along with Witkoff's deputy, traveled to Lebanon and openly demanded that the Lebanese government and army disarm Hezbollah. Hezbollah responded strongly. Wafiq Safa, head of liaison and coordination for Hezbollah and one of the group’s top officials, emphasized in an interview that disarmament is not part of Hezbollah’s strategic roadmap and laid out conditions for it—conditions that are practically impossible to meet. Later, Leader Shaykh Naim Qassim made a significant speech declaring that anyone calling for disarmament of the resistance is serving the Israeli enemy free of charge.
Who is pushing for Hezbollah’s disarmament?
1. The United States:
The campaign is led by Morgan Ortagus, Vitkoff’s deputy and the new special U.S. envoy to the Middle East (replacing Amos Hochstein in Lebanon). She has visited Lebanon multiple times, openly declaring that her main goal is the dismantling of Lebanon’s resistance movement. Her efforts align with the U.S. strategy to alter Lebanon’s military-security equation by reshaping the political equation in Beirut.
2. March 14 Alliance:
This coalition of anti-Hezbollah Lebanese political groups has long sought ways to neutralize the resistance and sees the current moment as ideal. Figures like Samir Geagea, Ashraf Rifi, and members of the Hariri family are among its key actors.
3. Israel and the Current Syrian Regime:
Both Tel Aviv and the present ruling regime in Damascus, as external enemies of Hezbollah, seek to permanently end the movement’s power. This has led to repeated Israeli incursions into Lebanon for precisely that reason.
Possible Scenarios:
1. Civil War:
In this scenario, Hezbollah refuses to disarm, leading to heightened tensions. If the government and army attempt to disarm the movement by force, it could spark an all-out civil war.
2. Integration into the Army:
This is an unlikely option but has been floated by some in Lebanon—similar to the integration of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) into the military. President Aoun has already rejected it, and Hezbollah has shown no intention of accepting this either.
3. Status Quo Continues:
This is the most likely outcome. Hezbollah retains its weapons, including missiles and drones, while the Lebanese government refrains from attempting disarmament by force. Meanwhile, the responsibility for defending national sovereignty is gradually shifted toward the state itself.
What is Hezbollah’s strategy?
Following its intense war with Israel and the assassination of its commanders and officials, Lebanon’s resistance movement is undergoing a comprehensive rebuilding phase—restoring its military command, intelligence leadership, and political structure. Hezbollah aims to draw lessons from the recent war and rebuild its strength through a gradual recovery process that requires time.
For now, Hezbollah avoids escalating tensions and instead plans to focus on the political front, particularly the 2026 elections. It aims to secure key parliamentary seats and reassert its political influence—though this will be no easy task. Amid all these developments, the disarmament of Hezbollah remains the key flashpoint between the Western-backed factions and the resistance movement in Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch
In recent months, following the ceasefire between Lebanon and israeli entity, considerable debate has arisen over Hezbollah’s weapons and the broader resistance movement in Lebanon, sparking widespread controversy. When Joseph Aoun, the President of Lebanon, stated that weapons should only be in the hands of the army, it caused a major uproar across Lebanese political circles.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump’s special representative on Lebanese affairs, along with Witkoff's deputy, traveled to Lebanon and openly demanded that the Lebanese government and army disarm Hezbollah. Hezbollah responded strongly. Wafiq Safa, head of liaison and coordination for Hezbollah and one of the group’s top officials, emphasized in an interview that disarmament is not part of Hezbollah’s strategic roadmap and laid out conditions for it—conditions that are practically impossible to meet. Later, Leader Shaykh Naim Qassim made a significant speech declaring that anyone calling for disarmament of the resistance is serving the Israeli enemy free of charge.
Who is pushing for Hezbollah’s disarmament?
1. The United States:
The campaign is led by Morgan Ortagus, Vitkoff’s deputy and the new special U.S. envoy to the Middle East (replacing Amos Hochstein in Lebanon). She has visited Lebanon multiple times, openly declaring that her main goal is the dismantling of Lebanon’s resistance movement. Her efforts align with the U.S. strategy to alter Lebanon’s military-security equation by reshaping the political equation in Beirut.
2. March 14 Alliance:
This coalition of anti-Hezbollah Lebanese political groups has long sought ways to neutralize the resistance and sees the current moment as ideal. Figures like Samir Geagea, Ashraf Rifi, and members of the Hariri family are among its key actors.
3. Israel and the Current Syrian Regime:
Both Tel Aviv and the present ruling regime in Damascus, as external enemies of Hezbollah, seek to permanently end the movement’s power. This has led to repeated Israeli incursions into Lebanon for precisely that reason.
Possible Scenarios:
1. Civil War:
In this scenario, Hezbollah refuses to disarm, leading to heightened tensions. If the government and army attempt to disarm the movement by force, it could spark an all-out civil war.
2. Integration into the Army:
This is an unlikely option but has been floated by some in Lebanon—similar to the integration of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) into the military. President Aoun has already rejected it, and Hezbollah has shown no intention of accepting this either.
3. Status Quo Continues:
This is the most likely outcome. Hezbollah retains its weapons, including missiles and drones, while the Lebanese government refrains from attempting disarmament by force. Meanwhile, the responsibility for defending national sovereignty is gradually shifted toward the state itself.
What is Hezbollah’s strategy?
Following its intense war with Israel and the assassination of its commanders and officials, Lebanon’s resistance movement is undergoing a comprehensive rebuilding phase—restoring its military command, intelligence leadership, and political structure. Hezbollah aims to draw lessons from the recent war and rebuild its strength through a gradual recovery process that requires time.
For now, Hezbollah avoids escalating tensions and instead plans to focus on the political front, particularly the 2026 elections. It aims to secure key parliamentary seats and reassert its political influence—though this will be no easy task. Amid all these developments, the disarmament of Hezbollah remains the key flashpoint between the Western-backed factions and the resistance movement in Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch
❤24🙏5