Forwarded from Phoronix News
Phoronix
Open-Source Intel TXT Support Published For Coreboot
Thanks to work done by 9elements Cyber Security for an unnamed client, there is now working open-source Intel TXT support for Coreboot with the patches under review for upstream inclusion...
Open-Source Intel TXT Support Published For Coreboot
Thanks to work done by 9elements Cyber Security for an unnamed client, there is now working open-source Intel TXT support for Coreboot with the patches under review for upstream inclusion...
Phoronix
Open-Source Intel TXT Support Published For Coreboot - Phoronix
Phoronix is the leading technology website for Linux hardware reviews, open-source news, Linux benchmarks, open-source benchmarks, and computer hardware tests.
Forwarded from Phoronix News
Phoronix
Half-Life: Alyx Releasing In March 2020 With Linux Support
While releasing the game on time might be more of a challenge, Valve did deliver in announcing Half-Life: Alyx as scheduled as their new flagship virtual-reality game...
Half-Life: Alyx Releasing In March 2020 With Linux Support
While releasing the game on time might be more of a challenge, Valve did deliver in announcing Half-Life: Alyx as scheduled as their new flagship virtual-reality game...
Phoronix
Half-Life: Alyx Releasing In March 2020 With Linux Support - Phoronix
Phoronix is the leading technology website for Linux hardware reviews, open-source news, Linux benchmarks, open-source benchmarks, and computer hardware tests.
Forwarded from meme tutorial
tl;dr: the .org TLD is gonna be sold to a random ass company which would remove any price caps on these domains. Given that a lot of open-source, unfinanced projects have .org websites, they would effectively either lose their domain name (i.e. internet presence, email service, etc.) or have to lose a lot of cash that would otherwise be used for development.
Forwarded from meme tutorial
also can I just say, "Ethos Capital"? that shit sounds like evil inc. from a fucking cartoon
Forwarded from the wires
If you have a .org domain name: go renew it now. For the full 10 years.
Registration rights for .org were just bought by a private equity firm. And as part of that contract, the price caps were removed.
Anything in .org will get much more expensive, soon.
A ten year renewal will cost you a bit over a hundred bucks. Which is probably less than one year will cost you in the very near future.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/11/20/org_registry_sale_shambles/
Registration rights for .org were just bought by a private equity firm. And as part of that contract, the price caps were removed.
Anything in .org will get much more expensive, soon.
A ten year renewal will cost you a bit over a hundred bucks. Which is probably less than one year will cost you in the very near future.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/11/20/org_registry_sale_shambles/
The Register
Internet world despairs as non-profit .org sold for $$$$ to private equity firm, price caps axed
Sale comes within months of DNS overseer pushing through controversial contract change
privacypossum/README.md at master · cowlicks/privacypossum · GitHub
https://github.com/cowlicks/privacypossum/blob/master/README.md
https://github.com/cowlicks/privacypossum/blob/master/README.md
GitHub
privacypossum/README.md at master · cowlicks/privacypossum
Privacy Possum makes tracking you less profitable. Contribute to cowlicks/privacypossum development by creating an account on GitHub.
emacs
privacypossum/README.md at master · cowlicks/privacypossum · GitHub https://github.com/cowlicks/privacypossum/blob/master/README.md
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from GNU Propaganda (Archived)
Ten Years Reproducibility Challenge
Did you ever try to run an old code that you wrote for a scientific article you published years ago? Did you encounter any problems? Were you successful? We are curious to hear your story. This is the reason why we are editing a special issue of ReScience to collect these stories.
The ten years reproducibility challenge is an invitation for researchers to try to run the code they’ve created for a scientific publication that was published more than ten years ago. This code can be anything (statistical analysis, numerical simulation, data processing, etc.), can be written in any language and can address any scientific domain. The only mandatory condition to enter the challenge is to have published a scientific article before 2010, in a journal or a conference with proceedings, which contains results produced by code, irrespectively of whether this code was published in some form at the time or not.
https://rescience.github.io/ten-years/
Did you ever try to run an old code that you wrote for a scientific article you published years ago? Did you encounter any problems? Were you successful? We are curious to hear your story. This is the reason why we are editing a special issue of ReScience to collect these stories.
The ten years reproducibility challenge is an invitation for researchers to try to run the code they’ve created for a scientific publication that was published more than ten years ago. This code can be anything (statistical analysis, numerical simulation, data processing, etc.), can be written in any language and can address any scientific domain. The only mandatory condition to enter the challenge is to have published a scientific article before 2010, in a journal or a conference with proceedings, which contains results produced by code, irrespectively of whether this code was published in some form at the time or not.
https://rescience.github.io/ten-years/