All making sense now why there giving foreigners housings over Irish 🤮

I recently learned that, in U.K., two cities, Oxford and Canterbury (where much of my family lives) are to pilot something to do with restricting movements. I believe it’s to divide the cities into sectors and they have the utterly anti-democratic temerity to tell us that we will be prevented from moving between sectors directly, even where existing roads exist. Instead, a person using their vehicle will be required to head outwards in the sector they start from, travel around the outside, and re-enter the city via a regulated threshold (you might recall I’ve gone on about regulated thresholds, speculating that every threshold will in due course become regulated, because technology makes that simple).
Each time you re-enter the city via smart camera controlled “gates”, it logs that movement.
You’re to be permitted 100 such movements per year. So if routinely you drop off & collect a person, I imagine you’ll be house bound pretty rapidly.
No concessions are made for electric vehicles or lightweight vehicles such as motorcycles. So it’s nothing to do with “carbon”.
I struggle to believe people are going to accept this. On the other hand, I don’t think the general public would have a clue what to do about it, given local politics is as corrupt and unresponsive as WEFMINSTER politics is.
I attach a report from ARUP, who detail “urban consumption in a 1.5C world”.
It’s eye opening. It’s stated that there are very specific targets & limits which citizens will be allowed, such as only being able to purchase three items of clothing each year. This implies extraordinary control over means of payment, but we already know they intend to delete cash and replace all payment methods with central bank digital currencies.
Please examine this UN-, WEF-, Climate Lies-allied proposed future for humanity.
I noticed that several countries have quietly amended their laws, not only to permit assisted suicide, but to lower the threshold more or less to asking on a whim. In Canada, a veteran disabled athlete was refused a wheelchair ramp to help her access her home, but told “If it’s that bad, we can offer you assisted suicide”. So those who look at this and think “I’d rather be dead than live like this” may well have their preferences facilitated!
Ghastly people.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.arup.com/-/media/arup/files/publications/c/arup-c40-the-future-of-urban-consumption-in-a-1-5c-world.pdf

Whats the bet, That most of these will end up over here...just watch...This is getting ridiculous now.

The Albanians see to be doing alright though as a community looking at the cars they drive when they brought London to a Standstill the other week. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqFlp8J9qxI

This is brilliantly put together. https://www.brighteon.com/6ca55ad0-f873-4658-b09a-d88733ea6e10

None of these Politicians are vaccinated because they know its Experimental and under Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) till 2023. Yet all of them betrayed the public and were involved in cover-ups and coercion and fear mongering the people. They no longer lawfully have a right to hold any office because they lied & were partakers of crimes against the people of Eire. They must all be removed from office!

“Nobody voted for this…there needs to be serious repercussions for whoever sanctioned it”: Irish Senator slams sexually explicit book recommended for schools, which she says would cause “uproar” if it was known by parents.

#gript

https://gript.ie/not-be-acceptable-in-schools-senator-on-sexually-explicit-book-listing/

this is a facinating story and explains how we are all enslaved and in dept to a system .. learn to break free.

Sunday, December 18, 2022
About "Your" Name -- Again
By Anna Von Reitz
Let me give you an atypical example, my own, so that you can better appreciate the situation.
In 1855, in international court, my Great-Grandfather entered -- as a trademark -- our present family Public Name: Riezinger. He created it out of thin air.
Unlike copyrights and other forms of Public Claims, trademarks continue in effect as long as they are in use and they apply worldwide.
By creating what appears to be a new "Surname" for his family as an international trademark, my ancestor created a Public Name for himself and his progeny that does not belong to any government.

Although it resembles German surnames, "Riezinger" was created to be our private property, held within our family as a possession and birthright, much as you might inherit any other piece of property, say a chest of drawers, and use it from childhood onward.
This does not reflect, however, the terms under which most people inherit a surname. Most people in the British Dominions inherit a surname (sir-name) as a citizenship obligation.
This is why they go around calling everyone by titles -- "Mister", "Sir", "Madam" and "Missus" and so on. A title implies an office and an office implies a public duty or, as it may be expressed, a public debt.
Your Christian Name, for example, "Anna Maria'', is yours by contract. Yeshuah paid for that under Roman Law.
The "Sur-name", aka, Family Name, however, belongs to the British Monarch--- that is, if it is a surname at all, and not a privately held international trademark.
Under British Law, the use of such a Surname/Family Name obligates you to perform as a British Citizen and accept your share of the pagan public debt.
So when they trafficked all of us Americans into their foreign jurisdiction and misidentified us all as British Territorial Citizens, they foisted their public debts off onto each and every one of us.
That was the whole point of the name game exercise -- enlisting us to pay their debts and serve as new collateral for them to borrow against.
Unless you hold what appears to be your "Family Name" as a private international trademark, or don't use a surname, the King claims to own you and to own your land and your (formerly) private property as a British Citizen-- an indentured servant of His Royal Majesty with an indefinite term of service.
So where does the Pope come into all of this? He pays the bond for the Christian Name, so that you can't be held responsible for pagan Public Debt --- so long as you don't use a Surname, or do what my ancestor did, and create a new name and use it as a private international trademark.
This situation has been caused by the necessity of paying the debts of dead men, especially war reparations.
Use me as an example again --- I was born fourteen years after the end of the Second World War. There's no way that I am in any way responsible for that great conflagration or for paying for all the cost of rebuilding afterward. But my Father and Mother could be debtors responsible for it, and in theory, I could be held responsible for their unpaid portion of that debt.
What's supposed to happen in America is that the debts of dead men are to be written off ---with corporations and businesses taking the losses, but they objected: "Alexander Lamont Smythe" may have died in 1981, but he still owes war reparations from WWII, and a phone bill, and as far as they are concerned, his family is responsible for paying it.
The King passes on this "Public Debt" via the Family Name, Smythe. Whatever the Public Debt might be, you get your part of it by virtue of using "his" sir-name, Smythe. All the family members of the name "Smythe" are responsible for all the debts of everyone who ever lived named "Smythe".
You can now see how everyone became hopelessly indebted and why politicians go on recklessly spending money "to be owed by" future generations.

85th anniversary of the Irish constitution and the date éiRe got independence .....
and not a single mention on State news broadcaster RTE

This youtube account is very popular with children and this is the add under it,there under psychological coercion 😞

a great day today with some patriots of éiRe in the peoples garden of rememberance to celebrate 85 year anniversary of our true constitution An Bunreacht 1937.... The peoples constitution... What a rush ..

beautiful day, so much gratitude to all - emotional day.