This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Head of UK Public Policy at Twitter was asked about why the platform marked a Tweet by Kulldorff, Professor of medicine at Harvard Medicine as "misleading" and limited the users' ability to share the Tweet.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How qualified was a fact-checker for Facebook to decide Carl Heneghan, a Professor from University of Oxford published 'false' information?
Reminds me. A friend with a child in a prestigious and expensive high school in the UK got an email notifying him yesterday that a child at the school had been "identified" as "COVID-19".
From the Head Teacher, it laid out the child was now "self isolating" as was the child's "bubble".
There was almost a hint of glee in the email, at their "identification" and their swiftness to follow these consequent procedures.
I said I'm 90% sure it was forensics played on an asymptomatic kid. Sick people you don't hunt for and "identify". They self identify! ;-)
So I asked him to write back and ask what the methodology used to "identify" was. Was it a two back to back LFT/antigen tests or antigen then PCR, on top of the child first presenting clinical symptoms?
Very much most likely they have child and "bubble" self isolating, and stoking fear, over RNA strands at best.
From the Head Teacher, it laid out the child was now "self isolating" as was the child's "bubble".
There was almost a hint of glee in the email, at their "identification" and their swiftness to follow these consequent procedures.
I said I'm 90% sure it was forensics played on an asymptomatic kid. Sick people you don't hunt for and "identify". They self identify! ;-)
So I asked him to write back and ask what the methodology used to "identify" was. Was it a two back to back LFT/antigen tests or antigen then PCR, on top of the child first presenting clinical symptoms?
Very much most likely they have child and "bubble" self isolating, and stoking fear, over RNA strands at best.
The past 10 days or so, I've been busy with client work (B2B health related). As I could not afford another year of attacking BS coronavirus narrative/s full time.
However I do wish to get some more corona related stuff out the door soon. So I ask myself why I need to, i.e. unpaid, stress plus time cost. And it's many reasons- but the first being that if we stay quiet when there is deception and lies, we are complicit if we know better.
If you stay quiet whilst the world around you is being engineered based on deception and lies, well it won't be very long before life is not worth living. Not exactly a heritage to leave for our children and grandchildren.
I say, whenever there are institutional lies, lies from leaders, from industry leaders etc., never never tire of giving the middle finger.
However I do wish to get some more corona related stuff out the door soon. So I ask myself why I need to, i.e. unpaid, stress plus time cost. And it's many reasons- but the first being that if we stay quiet when there is deception and lies, we are complicit if we know better.
If you stay quiet whilst the world around you is being engineered based on deception and lies, well it won't be very long before life is not worth living. Not exactly a heritage to leave for our children and grandchildren.
I say, whenever there are institutional lies, lies from leaders, from industry leaders etc., never never tire of giving the middle finger.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trust WHO - full documentary (2017)
Details https://www.journeyman.tv/film/7246/trustwho
Full https://lbry.tv/@Dryburgh:7/trust_who_documentary:1
Details https://www.journeyman.tv/film/7246/trustwho
Full https://lbry.tv/@Dryburgh:7/trust_who_documentary:1
I don't "follow" Levitt, in fact, I try to stay off Twitter. But Twitter offered me up a Levitt tweet again, and again it is very bizarre. As someone responded to this tweet already "This account is so weird, I honestly struggle to believe itβs real."
But the fairly recent transformation of what he says and how he says it is strikingly odd, and that coupled with him saying he left PANDA as they are anti-vax (they are not).
But the fairly recent transformation of what he says and how he says it is strikingly odd, and that coupled with him saying he left PANDA as they are anti-vax (they are not).
Meanwhile over in long lost Reality, the Swedish health authority, on PCR via translate, https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publicerat-material/publikationsarkiv/v/vagledning-om-kriterier-for-bedomning-av-smittfrihet-vid-covid-19/
UK Column, as I expected would happen, seem to be continually censored by YouTube.
Last YouTube online is 14 April, however I did see 23 April appear for hours on YouTube.
I ensure a duplicate on LBRY of all episodes. https://lbry.tv/@Dryburgh:7
Last YouTube online is 14 April, however I did see 23 April appear for hours on YouTube.
I ensure a duplicate on LBRY of all episodes. https://lbry.tv/@Dryburgh:7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Another angle of the police sent in to take sound equipment from a small group performing in Hyde Park last Saturday, under coronavirus legislation.
I'd call it an exercise in dumbfuckery.
I'd call it an exercise in dumbfuckery.