Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Protests against COVID restrictions continue in central Italy
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WhatsHerFace "Canada Home of the CanUCKS"
The same company that regularly censors lawful content critical of lockdowns.
BBC News - Google owner sees record profits as lockdown boom continues
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56910255
BBC News - Google owner sees record profits as lockdown boom continues
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56910255
I've defended Mercola plenty from ad homimen attacks. I've learned a lot from Joseph and he's been under very concerning assaults by Google since pre pandemic.
However, I've been watching what I can only call profiteering from the pandemic and capitalising on people's fears and anxieties.
Today's piece/email on Profusa is a final straw. I've known the CEO, Ben, for sometime. In fact I interviewed him here:
https://podcast.hyperwellbeing.com/episode/008-ben-hwang-injectable-biosensors/
The article is Ding-esk but coming from the other direction.
Having always defended Joe against "crank" claims, from today onwards in my mind he straddles being a crank, with a crank company, yet often relates great health knowledge you'd not get from conventional doctors.
However, I've been watching what I can only call profiteering from the pandemic and capitalising on people's fears and anxieties.
Today's piece/email on Profusa is a final straw. I've known the CEO, Ben, for sometime. In fact I interviewed him here:
https://podcast.hyperwellbeing.com/episode/008-ben-hwang-injectable-biosensors/
The article is Ding-esk but coming from the other direction.
Having always defended Joe against "crank" claims, from today onwards in my mind he straddles being a crank, with a crank company, yet often relates great health knowledge you'd not get from conventional doctors.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Leaky vax concerns. Very real concerns.
Forwarded from World Doctors Alliance
The Daily Sceptic
No Benefit of Social Distancing and Capacity Limits, Study Shows – The Daily Sceptic
A new study from MIT shows that social distancing is no protection from indoor transmission because the aerosols fill the room. However, the assumptions about the protection offered by masks are bizarre.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Some early Fauci.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
**100s of parents in Vail, AZ attended a School Board meeting, protesting mask mandates for schools. They would not leave. The Board was overwhelmed and outnumbered. They quit. The parents elected new members and immediately struck down mask mandates for kids. This is the way. **
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Head of UK Public Policy at Twitter was asked about why the platform marked a Tweet by Kulldorff, Professor of medicine at Harvard Medicine as "misleading" and limited the users' ability to share the Tweet.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How qualified was a fact-checker for Facebook to decide Carl Heneghan, a Professor from University of Oxford published 'false' information?
Reminds me. A friend with a child in a prestigious and expensive high school in the UK got an email notifying him yesterday that a child at the school had been "identified" as "COVID-19".
From the Head Teacher, it laid out the child was now "self isolating" as was the child's "bubble".
There was almost a hint of glee in the email, at their "identification" and their swiftness to follow these consequent procedures.
I said I'm 90% sure it was forensics played on an asymptomatic kid. Sick people you don't hunt for and "identify". They self identify! ;-)
So I asked him to write back and ask what the methodology used to "identify" was. Was it a two back to back LFT/antigen tests or antigen then PCR, on top of the child first presenting clinical symptoms?
Very much most likely they have child and "bubble" self isolating, and stoking fear, over RNA strands at best.
From the Head Teacher, it laid out the child was now "self isolating" as was the child's "bubble".
There was almost a hint of glee in the email, at their "identification" and their swiftness to follow these consequent procedures.
I said I'm 90% sure it was forensics played on an asymptomatic kid. Sick people you don't hunt for and "identify". They self identify! ;-)
So I asked him to write back and ask what the methodology used to "identify" was. Was it a two back to back LFT/antigen tests or antigen then PCR, on top of the child first presenting clinical symptoms?
Very much most likely they have child and "bubble" self isolating, and stoking fear, over RNA strands at best.