"YouTube censored videos of doctors & scientists criticizing COVID-19 lockdown policies.

Who benefited the most from the lockdowns? Big Tech, of course.

Science and democracy depend on open debate. Silencing debate is wrong. It’s a self-interested scam."

When the CCP is the first Govt to call a halt to "Vaccism" it becomes obvious mandates are being pushed by a cartel of corrupt pecuniary interests not any public health issue. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-calls-for-halt-to-mandatory-covid-19-vaccines-amid-inoculation-push

From back in January at WEF The Russian leader pointed to what he described as the negative role of technology companies that run top social networks, charging that they have abused their position and tried to “control the society, replace legitimate democratic institutions and usurp an individual’s right to decide how to live and what views to express”.
“We have seen it all in the United States,” Putin said without elaborating. https://archive.is/K5en0

Allegedly 200 police offers, 40 vehicles, 1 helicopter for 1 church.

🌐 - THE GREAT RESET:

The World Economic Forum who is behind The Great Reset is working on technocratic global governance rules to criminalize free speech. Facebook and Twitter employees are involved.

SHARE THE AWAKENING
@Intelops

Putin on Western politicians vax photo ops: “If somebody wants to falsify things and dupe people, at that level it’s not hard to do. You could show an injection, but the shot would actually be of saline fluid..or orange juice..maybe some vitamins”
https://www.rt.com/russia/519427-putin-vaccine-secrecy-explained/

CNN criticise FOX news anchors for not doing vax selfies.

You'd have to be seriously on the stupid side to be scanning bar codes to check in and check out of venues.

ROFLMAO this can't possibly be true.

Another ROFLMAO https://archive.is/2021.04.11-015825/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/10/exclusive-half-people-england-living-areas-almost-no-new-covid/

This is a great overview of the more complete immunologic picture. MSM only focuses on antibodies. https://youtu.be/6IY4M0kp8xM

Save the NHS. Stop mass vaccination. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/apr/09/ae-swamped-with-patients-seeking-help-for-mild-covid-jab-side-effects

The two Eric's!!! What a duo leading the unwarranted cult of covid hysteria.

Cheap asthma drug better than any other treatment for corona
"We have shown that the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide, given for a short duration, might be an effective treatment of early COVID-19 in adults. This effect, with a relative reduction of 91% of clinical deterioration is *equivalent to the efficacy seen after the use of COVID-19 vaccines and greater than that reported in any treatments used in hospitalised patients and patients with severe COVID-19*".
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2213-2600%2821%2900160-0

"People who develop COVID have complete and durable immunity - a very important principle - complete and durable. You can't beat natural immunity. You can't vaccinate on top of it and make it better. There's no scientific, clinical or safety rationale for ever vaccinating a COVID recovered patient.

There's no rationale for ever testing a COVID recovered patient. My wife and I are COVID recovered. Why did we go through the testing outside? There's absolutely no rationale.

I'd encourage this committee to actually look at what's being done and ask, is there any rationale, is there any rationale for anything? Listen, there's plenty of COVID recovered patients. Let them forgo the vaccine and let people who are clamoring for it get it. But at 80% herd immunity in the vaccine trials, fewer than 1% in the vaccine and the placebo actually get COVID. Fewer than 1%. The vaccine is going to have a 1% public health impact. That's what the data says. It's not going to save us. We're already 80% herd immune. If we're strategically targeted, we can actually close out the pandemic very well with the vaccine, but strategically targeted.

People under 50, who fundamentally have no health risks. There's no scientific rationale for them to ever become vaccinated." - Peter McCullough, MD (Texas Senate HHS Committee Testimony)

"One of the mistakes I heard today as a rationale for vaccination is asymptomatic spread. And I want you to be very clear about this. My opinion is there is a low degree, if any, of asymptomatic spread." - Peter McCullough, MD (Texas Senate HHS Committee Testimony)

Reading AFP's Fact Check on Peter McCullough, MD https://factcheck.afp.com/us-cardiologist-makes-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccination It's deceptive and wrong, as I've came to expect all too-often from "fact checking" services.

Hi Oliver,

I was reading this AFP "fact check"

https://factcheck.afp.com/us-cardiologist-makes-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccination

It states:

Olivier Schwartz, head of the Virus and Immunity Unit at the Pasteur Institute, told AFP by phone: “It is obvious that people under 50 who are in good health should be vaccinated” because they can still be affected by the disease.

I came across it in part because I've been trying to find someone qualified who can explain the reason/s to vaccinate everyone, and not just the vulnerable.

I've been struggling for weeks to find anyone. Everyone I've found has said we absolutely should not be vaccinating everyone. In fact I've been told that I won't find an infectious disease epidemiologist who will lend support to vaccinating everyone.

Some responses by scientists to my initial asking around almost two-weeks ago are here https://dryburgh.com/should-everyone-get-vaccinated/

I absolutely do not understand your statement to AFP. People under 50 in good health have negligible risk, comparable to that of influenza. The vaccines are novel (still under trial) and as such there is insufficient safety data to warrant their use on individuals who face negligible risk from the disease. The immediate side effects of the vaccine alone, are worse than a SARS-CoV-2 infection for many.

Furthermore the immunity conferred is narrow unlike natural immunity, and the vaccine could potentially lead to suboptimal innate immune response. See https://dryburgh.com/byram-bridle-coronavirus-vaccine-concerns/

From what I gather the complexity of the immune system is akin to the size of the universe and so far, we haven't even mapped out a galaxy. In this context I understand vaccines to be akin to a crow-bar, i.e. that caution and judgement should be used when considering such a blunt instrument.

I'd love to hear your thoughts. I promise not to quote you, i.e. to keep it private.

Regards

Lee