Anthropic Is Forcing Users to Pay Extra to Run OpenClaw With Claude
Bad news, OpenClaw fans: Anthropic wants you to pay more to use its AI models. This wasn't something Anthropic necessarily announced, either; rather, the company started sending emails to affected users, letting them know they could no longer use their Claude Code subscription limits with third-party "harnesses," including—and most notabl—OpenClaw. Anthropic confirmed users could still connect to OpenClaw with their Claude account, but they'd have to pay more money in order to do so—including a "pay-as-you-go" option tacked onto the cost of the subscription.
According to Anthropic, this policy change isn't without logic or reason. As highlighted by TechCrunch, Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code, explained on X that the company's subscriptions "weren't built for the usage patterns of these third-party tools," and that Anthropic is prioritizing customers who are using the company's first-party products and API.
OpenClaw has had quite a ride. The tool, which was previously called Moltbot, and first called Clawdbot, is designed to be an agentic AI assistant you run locally on your devices. For many, that means running OpenClaw on a Mac mini designed for this one purpose. Unlike ChatGPT or Gemini, which has their own proprietary interfaces, you communicate with OpenClaw through any chat app of your choice. You can text OpenClaw in WhatsApp, Apple Messages, Microsoft Teams, whatever you want, to organize your email inbox, write code for a project, plan out your goals for the month, whatever it is you want your agent to do.
But OpenClaw doesn't just...run. You need to power it with an AI model. In this case, users are relying on Anthropic's Claude—and, if they had a Claude Code subscription, they were simply tapping into that plan they already paid for. As you might expect, running agentic tasks through OpenClaw is extremely intensive, which pushed Anthropic to rethink how it was charging users.
Interestingly, OpenClaw's founder, Peter Steinberger, joined OpenAI back in February—one of Anthropic's chief rivals. Steinberger said on X that he and OpenClaw board member Dave Morin "tried to talk sense into Anthropic, [but] best we managed was delaying this for a week."
via Lifehacker (author: Jake Peterson)
Bad news, OpenClaw fans: Anthropic wants you to pay more to use its AI models. This wasn't something Anthropic necessarily announced, either; rather, the company started sending emails to affected users, letting them know they could no longer use their Claude Code subscription limits with third-party "harnesses," including—and most notabl—OpenClaw. Anthropic confirmed users could still connect to OpenClaw with their Claude account, but they'd have to pay more money in order to do so—including a "pay-as-you-go" option tacked onto the cost of the subscription.
According to Anthropic, this policy change isn't without logic or reason. As highlighted by TechCrunch, Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code, explained on X that the company's subscriptions "weren't built for the usage patterns of these third-party tools," and that Anthropic is prioritizing customers who are using the company's first-party products and API.
OpenClaw has had quite a ride. The tool, which was previously called Moltbot, and first called Clawdbot, is designed to be an agentic AI assistant you run locally on your devices. For many, that means running OpenClaw on a Mac mini designed for this one purpose. Unlike ChatGPT or Gemini, which has their own proprietary interfaces, you communicate with OpenClaw through any chat app of your choice. You can text OpenClaw in WhatsApp, Apple Messages, Microsoft Teams, whatever you want, to organize your email inbox, write code for a project, plan out your goals for the month, whatever it is you want your agent to do.
But OpenClaw doesn't just...run. You need to power it with an AI model. In this case, users are relying on Anthropic's Claude—and, if they had a Claude Code subscription, they were simply tapping into that plan they already paid for. As you might expect, running agentic tasks through OpenClaw is extremely intensive, which pushed Anthropic to rethink how it was charging users.
Interestingly, OpenClaw's founder, Peter Steinberger, joined OpenAI back in February—one of Anthropic's chief rivals. Steinberger said on X that he and OpenClaw board member Dave Morin "tried to talk sense into Anthropic, [but] best we managed was delaying this for a week."
via Lifehacker (author: Jake Peterson)
This Ecobee Thermostat and Security Bundle Is a Great Way to Kickstart Your Smart Home
via Lifehacker (author: Naima Karp)
via Lifehacker (author: Naima Karp)
Telegraph
This Ecobee Thermostat and Security Bundle Is a Great Way to…
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. A smart thermostat is a key part of keeping any smart home comfortable, but it's important to invest in the home's safety, too. The…
Yes, Microsoft Really Said Copilot Is ‘for Entertainment Purposes Only’ (but That's Changing)
AI inspires strong feelings. Some love it, some hate it, few are indifferent. But, usually, AI's biggest proponents are the companies that make and sell the tech. You expect OpenAI to tout ChatGPT's benefits, or Google to talk-up how useful Gemini is. For a company like these to say that their AI tools are nothing but a plaything would be a ludicrous concept—and yet, that's apparently what Microsoft did.
As reported by TechCrunch, Microsoft's terms of service for Copilot aren't too laudatory of the AI tech or its capabilities. The policy, which was last updated on October 24, 2025, says the following: “Copilot is for entertainment purposes only...It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.”
To be fair, most—if not all—AI companies put a warning like this on their tools. You'll see it with ChatGPT and Gemini, urging you to exercise caution when using AI for, well, anything. The tech is not perfect, and may quite literally make things up. As such, the alerts are there to remind you that the results you get may not be accurate—and if you're using the tech for something important, you should probably check the bot's work yourself.
But the noteworthy thing here is that first line: "Copilot is for entertainment purposes only." That's pretty rich, considering the fact the company has not only infused most of its apps and services (as well as Windows itself) with Copilot features, but it actively advertises Copilot as a tool for work. Copilot is a part of the entire Microsoft 365 worksuite now—to say that a "core" element to apps like PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams is just "entertainment" undermines Microsoft's sales pitch (while emboldening its critics). It also comes at the same time the company is removing what it calls "unnecessary" Copilot features from its products.
To be fair, Microsoft is not standing by this description. In a comment to PCMag, a company rep shared that Microsoft will be updating "legacy language." The full quote reads: "The ‘entertainment purposes’ phrasing is legacy language from when Copilot originally launched as a search companion service in Bing. As the product has evolved, that language is no longer reflective of how Copilot is used today and will be altered with our next update."
Generative AI features were definitely more entertainment focused that productivity focused following ChatGPT's launch in late 2022 (I tested the chatbot by asking it to write me stories and poems). But the AI race has been in full swing for about three years at this point: Copilot is no longer a companion to Bing; it's one of the major AI tools out there. For Microsoft to not catch this "legacy language" is a bit emblematic of the company as a whole at this point. Microsoft wants users to take its AI tech seriously, but it’s overlooking the little details that actually matter to those users. What we’re left with is not a clean, well-optimized version of Windows, but one stuffed with AI features few actually wanted—features that are, apparently, for entertainment purposes only.
via Lifehacker (author: Jake Peterson)
AI inspires strong feelings. Some love it, some hate it, few are indifferent. But, usually, AI's biggest proponents are the companies that make and sell the tech. You expect OpenAI to tout ChatGPT's benefits, or Google to talk-up how useful Gemini is. For a company like these to say that their AI tools are nothing but a plaything would be a ludicrous concept—and yet, that's apparently what Microsoft did.
As reported by TechCrunch, Microsoft's terms of service for Copilot aren't too laudatory of the AI tech or its capabilities. The policy, which was last updated on October 24, 2025, says the following: “Copilot is for entertainment purposes only...It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.”
To be fair, most—if not all—AI companies put a warning like this on their tools. You'll see it with ChatGPT and Gemini, urging you to exercise caution when using AI for, well, anything. The tech is not perfect, and may quite literally make things up. As such, the alerts are there to remind you that the results you get may not be accurate—and if you're using the tech for something important, you should probably check the bot's work yourself.
But the noteworthy thing here is that first line: "Copilot is for entertainment purposes only." That's pretty rich, considering the fact the company has not only infused most of its apps and services (as well as Windows itself) with Copilot features, but it actively advertises Copilot as a tool for work. Copilot is a part of the entire Microsoft 365 worksuite now—to say that a "core" element to apps like PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams is just "entertainment" undermines Microsoft's sales pitch (while emboldening its critics). It also comes at the same time the company is removing what it calls "unnecessary" Copilot features from its products.
To be fair, Microsoft is not standing by this description. In a comment to PCMag, a company rep shared that Microsoft will be updating "legacy language." The full quote reads: "The ‘entertainment purposes’ phrasing is legacy language from when Copilot originally launched as a search companion service in Bing. As the product has evolved, that language is no longer reflective of how Copilot is used today and will be altered with our next update."
Generative AI features were definitely more entertainment focused that productivity focused following ChatGPT's launch in late 2022 (I tested the chatbot by asking it to write me stories and poems). But the AI race has been in full swing for about three years at this point: Copilot is no longer a companion to Bing; it's one of the major AI tools out there. For Microsoft to not catch this "legacy language" is a bit emblematic of the company as a whole at this point. Microsoft wants users to take its AI tech seriously, but it’s overlooking the little details that actually matter to those users. What we’re left with is not a clean, well-optimized version of Windows, but one stuffed with AI features few actually wanted—features that are, apparently, for entertainment purposes only.
via Lifehacker (author: Jake Peterson)
《午后最后的草坪》里的嬉皮士运动和幽灵 (评论: 中国行きのスロウ・ボート (中公文庫))
gansen评论: 中国行きのスロウ・ボート (中公文庫)
评价: 力荐
via 豆瓣最受欢迎的书评 (author: gansen)
gansen评论: 中国行きのスロウ・ボート (中公文庫)
评价: 力荐
via 豆瓣最受欢迎的书评 (author: gansen)
Beware of the Trains 各篇目谜面及简评 (评论: Beware of the Trains)
山寨评论: Beware of the Trains
评价: 还行
via 豆瓣最受欢迎的书评 (author: 山寨)
山寨评论: Beware of the Trains
评价: 还行
via 豆瓣最受欢迎的书评 (author: 山寨)
Sony's Outstanding WH-1000XM5 Headphones Are $150 Off Right Now
via Lifehacker (author: Daniel Oropeza)
via Lifehacker (author: Daniel Oropeza)
Telegraph
Sony's Outstanding WH-1000XM5 Headphones Are $150 Off Right …
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. The Sony WH-1000XM6, headphones are the most recent entry in Sony's 1000X series, which has been around since 2016. They're the best…
Pitchfork Review中文拙译：Kate & Anna McGarrigle-Kate & Anna McGarrigle (评论: Kate & Anna McGarrigle)
rkiveszx97评论: Kate & Anna McGarrigle
评价: 力荐
via 豆瓣最受欢迎的乐评 (author: rkiveszx97)
rkiveszx97评论: Kate & Anna McGarrigle
评价: 力荐
via 豆瓣最受欢迎的乐评 (author: rkiveszx97)