Forwarded from DoomPosting
Studies: It takes less than one second for people to accurately judge beauty
Beauty can be identified and processed in under 1 second
Palomares et al. (2018) found a similar result that only 33 ms were necessary for a high degree of agreement
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Beauty can be identified and processed in under 1 second
Palomares et al. (2018) found a similar result that only 33 ms were necessary for a high degree of agreement
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Forwarded from DoomPosting
Studies: Babies can easily differentiate between attractive and unattractive faces
Newborn babies can easily differentiate between attractive and unattractive faces, suggesting that face recognition is hardwired at birth, rather than learned
Slater at al. took pictures of a variety of faces and asked adult subjects to rate them for attractiveness on a scale from 1 to 5. The researchers then searched for pairs of photographs that were similar in all respects β in brightness and contrast, for example β but at opposite ends of the attractiveness scale
They then presented these paired photographs to newborn infants, who ranged in age from one to seven days old. All babies were still in hospital after birth. One researcher held each infant upright about 30 centimetres away from the two photos. Another stood out of view and noted where the babies eyes were directed
On average, the babies spent 80% of their time looking at the more attractive face than the less attractive one
This is solid evidence that the social constructionist view of beauty is false
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Newborn babies can easily differentiate between attractive and unattractive faces, suggesting that face recognition is hardwired at birth, rather than learned
Slater at al. took pictures of a variety of faces and asked adult subjects to rate them for attractiveness on a scale from 1 to 5. The researchers then searched for pairs of photographs that were similar in all respects β in brightness and contrast, for example β but at opposite ends of the attractiveness scale
They then presented these paired photographs to newborn infants, who ranged in age from one to seven days old. All babies were still in hospital after birth. One researcher held each infant upright about 30 centimetres away from the two photos. Another stood out of view and noted where the babies eyes were directed
On average, the babies spent 80% of their time looking at the more attractive face than the less attractive one
This is solid evidence that the social constructionist view of beauty is false
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Schools spent ~100% of their time in math on teaching
(1) Memorizing performing basic addition and multiplication β something calculators have long been able to do
(2) Solving equations β something modern AIs and solvers now have nearly entirely solved
When they should have spent ~100% of that time on:
(3) Properly translating from english to the equations β Which computers and humans are still often horrible at
But ofc they wouldnβt do that, because (3) is too g-loaded, and schools hate focusing on actual g-loaded things because sexism and racism or something
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
(1) Memorizing performing basic addition and multiplication β something calculators have long been able to do
(2) Solving equations β something modern AIs and solvers now have nearly entirely solved
When they should have spent ~100% of that time on:
(3) Properly translating from english to the equations β Which computers and humans are still often horrible at
But ofc they wouldnβt do that, because (3) is too g-loaded, and schools hate focusing on actual g-loaded things because sexism and racism or something
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
NOW: SEC issues guidance saying "staking" is not a security
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
PHOTO: ICE raided multiple construction sites in Tallahassee on Thursday & arrested over 100 illegal aliens
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Scott Adams on laziness
β Suggests what if laziness may arise from focusing on the cost of things, instead of the payoff
Iβll tell you what though
β Found in the past year though, many dgaf about the payoff
Truly dgaf, at all
E.g. incredible 250x or 750x payoffs, that people not only ignore when warned ahead of time, remaining completely unexcited when true opportunity comes loudly knocking
β But also completely ignoring and disregaring even AFTER theyβve actually fully happened, as if nothing just happened at all
What if the vast majority of people are totally unexcited about enormous payoffs as well?
Maybe has something to do with the βscarsβ many get from being in bear times, as those VC memos mentioned
Or maybe just the world is a lazy place
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
β Suggests what if laziness may arise from focusing on the cost of things, instead of the payoff
Iβll tell you what though
β Found in the past year though, many dgaf about the payoff
Truly dgaf, at all
E.g. incredible 250x or 750x payoffs, that people not only ignore when warned ahead of time, remaining completely unexcited when true opportunity comes loudly knocking
β But also completely ignoring and disregaring even AFTER theyβve actually fully happened, as if nothing just happened at all
What if the vast majority of people are totally unexcited about enormous payoffs as well?
Maybe has something to do with the βscarsβ many get from being in bear times, as those VC memos mentioned
Or maybe just the world is a lazy place
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
DoomPosting
Keganβs Orders of Conciousness Level 1: babies understanding object permanence Level 2: can understand what gets you what you want, but little personal values beyond that very crude values system Level 3: tribal adopting of your tribeβs values which areβ¦
But ofc, many will insist that women who think like these donβt exist,
or say these must be some kind of extreme rare exception, that for some reason donβt count
Kegan was right, that fewer than 1% of people are ever able to truly comprehend that there are many others whose mind thinks completely differently from how theirs does,
i.e. Keganβs Orders of Conciousness Level 5
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
or say these must be some kind of extreme rare exception, that for some reason donβt count
Kegan was right, that fewer than 1% of people are ever able to truly comprehend that there are many others whose mind thinks completely differently from how theirs does,
i.e. Keganβs Orders of Conciousness Level 5
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
DoomPosting
Supposed super trader James Wynn now shilling affiliate links The real day trader business model revealed Leading lambs to the perps slaughter, getting paid affiliate commissions π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
LIQUIDATED
Bam, itβs really over
James Wynn just got liquidated for 949 $BTC($99.3M) as the price of $BTC dropped below $105,000
Perps are evil
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Bam, itβs really over
James Wynn just got liquidated for 949 $BTC($99.3M) as the price of $BTC dropped below $105,000
Perps are evil
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
The winning strategy lately? Do the opposite of James Wynn.
0x2258 has been counter-trading James Wynnβshorting when James Wynn goes long, and going long when James Wynn shorts.
In the past week, 0x2258 has made ~$17M, while James Wynn has lost ~$98M.
Crypto Cramer
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
0x2258 has been counter-trading James Wynnβshorting when James Wynn goes long, and going long when James Wynn shorts.
In the past week, 0x2258 has made ~$17M, while James Wynn has lost ~$98M.
Crypto Cramer
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ