Blah blah blah not reading all that because looks like you’re missing a HUGE HALF of the equation
Human mating has always had TWO huge parts:
(1) FEELS-BASED: Women’s mating preferences about ~everything EXCEPT money — Which puts WOMEN in 100% direct control over which genes get passed on, for these preferences
(2) WEALTH-BASED: Women’s perference to mate with whatever men are richer — Which actually takes any direct control over gene selection OUT OF WOMEN’S HANDS, and instead puts this gene selection control into the hands of some combination of MEN & NATURE forces to determine who gets richest. E.g. whatever men overcome nature and build the aquaduct that survives, or figure out how to forge swords whose metal works better, win the weath, and win the babes
I.e. to the degree that women just went with (2), just choosing whoever was getting wealthier — WOMEN WERE COMPLETELY GIVING UP CONTROL OVER GENE SELECTION, and passing that control to someone or something else
Arguably, with this in mind, women’s mating choices may have had ~ZERO responsibility for success in evolving man’s genes from primitive primates to modern man — instead that success being solely from a combination of man & nature, who determined wealth, arguably.
Now, where does a modern problem arise?
— When society has advanced to the point where things are running themselves, and suddenly women exercise great control in determining BOTH (1) and (2)
Suddenly women deciding not only based on their own personal preferences, but also obtaining great control in deciding which guys get wealthier and which are left poorer
I.e. the rise of Communism, vastly reshaping the decision over who gets richer or poorer in ways totally disconnected from natural reality in any way
— Could be expected to have massive effects on genes
Who gets rich was NEVER something decided by women, since the dawn of time — but now suddenly it is becoming so, which is a massive thing that few seem to have realized
He who controls the money controls the genes, in the long term
Think about it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Human mating has always had TWO huge parts:
(1) FEELS-BASED: Women’s mating preferences about ~everything EXCEPT money — Which puts WOMEN in 100% direct control over which genes get passed on, for these preferences
(2) WEALTH-BASED: Women’s perference to mate with whatever men are richer — Which actually takes any direct control over gene selection OUT OF WOMEN’S HANDS, and instead puts this gene selection control into the hands of some combination of MEN & NATURE forces to determine who gets richest. E.g. whatever men overcome nature and build the aquaduct that survives, or figure out how to forge swords whose metal works better, win the weath, and win the babes
I.e. to the degree that women just went with (2), just choosing whoever was getting wealthier — WOMEN WERE COMPLETELY GIVING UP CONTROL OVER GENE SELECTION, and passing that control to someone or something else
Arguably, with this in mind, women’s mating choices may have had ~ZERO responsibility for success in evolving man’s genes from primitive primates to modern man — instead that success being solely from a combination of man & nature, who determined wealth, arguably.
Now, where does a modern problem arise?
— When society has advanced to the point where things are running themselves, and suddenly women exercise great control in determining BOTH (1) and (2)
Suddenly women deciding not only based on their own personal preferences, but also obtaining great control in deciding which guys get wealthier and which are left poorer
I.e. the rise of Communism, vastly reshaping the decision over who gets richer or poorer in ways totally disconnected from natural reality in any way
— Could be expected to have massive effects on genes
Who gets rich was NEVER something decided by women, since the dawn of time — but now suddenly it is becoming so, which is a massive thing that few seem to have realized
He who controls the money controls the genes, in the long term
Think about it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
You’re both wrong you idiots
Women overwhelmingly selected the guys who they expected to give them more wealth
…usually just by looking at very simple crude proxy measures like their current wealth / credentials / social following
It’s the money morons
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Women overwhelmingly selected the guys who they expected to give them more wealth
…usually just by looking at very simple crude proxy measures like their current wealth / credentials / social following
It’s the money morons
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Forwarded from DoomPosting
“Resource shocks” studies
— Girlfriends who refused to have families suddenly demanding to get married and pregnant, after guys suddenly start earning much more than the women do
Many such cases
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— Girlfriends who refused to have families suddenly demanding to get married and pregnant, after guys suddenly start earning much more than the women do
Many such cases
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Been meaning to define this one for a while,
You: Post some unflattering but true statistic about women
Them: “You hate women”
On the surface, this is clearly nonsense, but it feels like they believe it does mean something, so what could it mean?
Answer: It’s women thinking, because the accuser thinks in the woman style, and so assumes others must too.
I.e. the accuser is saying that everyone must be evil-feminine passive-aggressive.
I.e. Passive aggressive means hating someone, but instead of directly confronting them, you being a two-faced person who says they love them while spreading terrible things about them.
Meanwhile, in feminine-thinking world, if you like someone you’re also supposed to only say nice or neutral things about someone, even if they’re total lies.
Ofc, this is not male thinking at all — where it can be perfectly fine to share truths for the sake of truth, regardless of whether you hate or love someone.
= I.e. This is an accusation by the female-minded who are accusing you of being female minded, because their theory of mind is so bad that they can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.
(Or putting on a fake performance for an audience with horrible theory of mind that can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
You: Post some unflattering but true statistic about women
Them: “You hate women”
On the surface, this is clearly nonsense, but it feels like they believe it does mean something, so what could it mean?
Answer: It’s women thinking, because the accuser thinks in the woman style, and so assumes others must too.
I.e. the accuser is saying that everyone must be evil-feminine passive-aggressive.
I.e. Passive aggressive means hating someone, but instead of directly confronting them, you being a two-faced person who says they love them while spreading terrible things about them.
Meanwhile, in feminine-thinking world, if you like someone you’re also supposed to only say nice or neutral things about someone, even if they’re total lies.
Ofc, this is not male thinking at all — where it can be perfectly fine to share truths for the sake of truth, regardless of whether you hate or love someone.
= I.e. This is an accusation by the female-minded who are accusing you of being female minded, because their theory of mind is so bad that they can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.
(Or putting on a fake performance for an audience with horrible theory of mind that can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Bro mind: You should say what’s true no matter if it’s unflattering, regardless of whether you like the person
Feminine mind: You should lie to be more flattering if you like the person
— This is where the “you must hate women!” retardation comes from,
simply projecting that everyone must be feminine-minded, when clearly that’s not true
Poor theory of mind
(Some gender overlap here, with some bro-minded women and some women-minded men)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Feminine mind: You should lie to be more flattering if you like the person
— This is where the “you must hate women!” retardation comes from,
simply projecting that everyone must be feminine-minded, when clearly that’s not true
Poor theory of mind
(Some gender overlap here, with some bro-minded women and some women-minded men)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Ok now this is interesting — Study which found that men are better than women at selecting for mates with good genes
(If the blue square is more rightward for bad traits then women selected more poorly)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
(If the blue square is more rightward for bad traits then women selected more poorly)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
DoomPosting
GM leveraged perps are a bad idea 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Leveraged perps traders have been trash talking utility coins & memecoins for years,
But let’s look at how these different kinds of coins stack up
+ Utility coins: Building new things, and the world still needs many new things built, emperically trillions of dollars worth of wealth has been built here, as L1s fall under this, and that wealth is not dissapearing overnight
+ Memecoins: Building communities, and communities can have huge value, believe it or not. Communities have been proven to have huge value outside of crypto a million times, and crypto is no different here.
+ Leveraged perps: Pure negative-sum insanity, that drains crypto of its valuable risk capital, while not even buying the real underlying assets, because they’re just fake contracts. Not even redistributing winnings to savvier traders, because the vast majority instead is getting drained to the platforms themselves, and this amount dwarfs what has been drained by memecoins or utility coins. The empirical returns distribution is truly insane, much worse than that of the other coin types.
Leveraged perps guys have been calling everyone else evil for years, but by the numbers,
sure looks like they have always been the biggest evil by far, and it’s not even close
— Time to declare war on the leveraged perps traders
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
But let’s look at how these different kinds of coins stack up
+ Utility coins: Building new things, and the world still needs many new things built, emperically trillions of dollars worth of wealth has been built here, as L1s fall under this, and that wealth is not dissapearing overnight
+ Memecoins: Building communities, and communities can have huge value, believe it or not. Communities have been proven to have huge value outside of crypto a million times, and crypto is no different here.
+ Leveraged perps: Pure negative-sum insanity, that drains crypto of its valuable risk capital, while not even buying the real underlying assets, because they’re just fake contracts. Not even redistributing winnings to savvier traders, because the vast majority instead is getting drained to the platforms themselves, and this amount dwarfs what has been drained by memecoins or utility coins. The empirical returns distribution is truly insane, much worse than that of the other coin types.
Leveraged perps guys have been calling everyone else evil for years, but by the numbers,
sure looks like they have always been the biggest evil by far, and it’s not even close
— Time to declare war on the leveraged perps traders
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶