DoomPosting
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Studies: Women sabotaging other women, intentionally making other women uglier
Women tended to recommend cutting the most hair off clients they perceived to be as attractive as themselves. These data suggest that just like mating, intrasexual competition may be assortative with respect to mate value. They also demonstrate that competitive motives can impact female-female interactions even in scenarios which feature no prospective mates, and are nominally unrelated to mate guarding or mating competition.
Study
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Women tended to recommend cutting the most hair off clients they perceived to be as attractive as themselves. These data suggest that just like mating, intrasexual competition may be assortative with respect to mate value. They also demonstrate that competitive motives can impact female-female interactions even in scenarios which feature no prospective mates, and are nominally unrelated to mate guarding or mating competition.
Study
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
One of the biggest pieces of BS on the right
Women do not change these core traits βfor a strong enough manβ
Absolute BS, especially at the extremes
Itβs biological β you can literally see strong left vs right in brain scans
You might help someone see who they really are, you might convince someone to lie about who they really are β but people never change
This is also one of the reasons the right fails so horribly at βfriend vs enemy distinctionβ
People never really change
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Women do not change these core traits βfor a strong enough manβ
Absolute BS, especially at the extremes
Itβs biological β you can literally see strong left vs right in brain scans
You might help someone see who they really are, you might convince someone to lie about who they really are β but people never change
This is also one of the reasons the right fails so horribly at βfriend vs enemy distinctionβ
People never really change
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Enormous evidence for strong innate predisposition continuously surprises us all, myself included
Humans naturally find it hard to believe in this sort of predeterminism
People WANT to believe that every choice you make is of your own free will, not arising from some innate predisposition
β But this itself is a failure of theory of mind, a failure to understand your own mind
Like a deep-sea diver, who must recognize the deadly drunken misleading feeling of nitrogen narcosis
β We too must accept that sometimes our strong feelings are simply a product of our biology, not arising from free will thought, step back, and assess if they are right or wrong
Innate predisposition rules the world
You must recognize it before you can control it
And no, you canβt change her
(Well, unless injecting with serious hormones or something stronger β biology rules all)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Humans naturally find it hard to believe in this sort of predeterminism
People WANT to believe that every choice you make is of your own free will, not arising from some innate predisposition
β But this itself is a failure of theory of mind, a failure to understand your own mind
Like a deep-sea diver, who must recognize the deadly drunken misleading feeling of nitrogen narcosis
β We too must accept that sometimes our strong feelings are simply a product of our biology, not arising from free will thought, step back, and assess if they are right or wrong
Innate predisposition rules the world
You must recognize it before you can control it
And no, you canβt change her
(Well, unless injecting with serious hormones or something stronger β biology rules all)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
DoomPosting
Study: Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics Finding 1. All psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic influence = Nature > nurture, beyond your wildest dreams, everything left told you was a lie Finding 2. No traits areβ¦
Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics
#6 Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics
βGenetic amplificationβ
= Essentially, people never really change who they are β rather they become more of who they truly are biologically predisposed to be, as they age
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
#6 Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics
βGenetic amplificationβ
= Essentially, people never really change who they are β rather they become more of who they truly are biologically predisposed to be, as they age
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Does biological predispision mean people canβt be changed?
No, both left and right DO still believe that people often can be changed, though their respective approaches are quite different:
Right: INCENTIVES are the best way to change people, and no amount of education about whatβs good can change peopleβs minds, if you donβt change the incentives. Huge incentives changes through credible threat of serious jail time, if not removing people from the population entirely, is the only way. Edit: Oh, also biology-changing drugs.
Left: EDUCATION / NURTURE is all you need to convince these serial rapists and murderers that rape and murder is not good. Just no one ever taught them bro. Theyβll totally change if we just educate them bro. Check out this educational no no square tiktok we did. Thatβll stop the rapes bro.
Right loves change through incentives or just filtering for people with better matched biological-predisposition, while left loves change through education.
Which do you think really works better?
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
No, both left and right DO still believe that people often can be changed, though their respective approaches are quite different:
Right: INCENTIVES are the best way to change people, and no amount of education about whatβs good can change peopleβs minds, if you donβt change the incentives. Huge incentives changes through credible threat of serious jail time, if not removing people from the population entirely, is the only way. Edit: Oh, also biology-changing drugs.
Left: EDUCATION / NURTURE is all you need to convince these serial rapists and murderers that rape and murder is not good. Just no one ever taught them bro. Theyβll totally change if we just educate them bro. Check out this educational no no square tiktok we did. Thatβll stop the rapes bro.
Right loves change through incentives or just filtering for people with better matched biological-predisposition, while left loves change through education.
Which do you think really works better?
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Designer babies β Another new tech that will change the world,
and is certainly coming, whether we like it or not.
(Not that people didnβt already have huge lattitude in choosing the traits their children will have, through partner selection β but ofc this takes it up several notches.)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
and is certainly coming, whether we like it or not.
(Not that people didnβt already have huge lattitude in choosing the traits their children will have, through partner selection β but ofc this takes it up several notches.)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Cost of genetic modification, like many other technologies,
β is dropping exponentially over time
Will become dirt cheap
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
β is dropping exponentially over time
Will become dirt cheap
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ