JUST IN - YouTube admits to having censored people during the COVID pandemic, and for political reasons. Offers terminated creators the opportunity to rejoin the platform
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬5😱2
In the NC Senate, 77.8% of 36 Whites (non-Jewish) voted YES on Iryna's Law.
0% of the 10 Blacks voted Yes. There are two outspokenly Jewish members, an Arab, and a Bharatiya (India). 0% of these four voted Yes.
Overall the vote was 56% Yes, 16% No, and 28% Not Voting.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
0% of the 10 Blacks voted Yes. There are two outspokenly Jewish members, an Arab, and a Bharatiya (India). 0% of these four voted Yes.
Overall the vote was 56% Yes, 16% No, and 28% Not Voting.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5💯4
Mujtaba Mohammed, a North Carolina Democratic senator, has introduced a legislative amendment to BAN the use of a deceased crime victim's name, age, image, or likeness in political ads without the consent of their family, in response to the savage murder of Iryna Zarutska
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬16🌚1
The Biden Administration has now been caught using the government to force Twitter, YouTube and Facebook at censor his political enemies.
Exactly what an actual fascist would do.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Exactly what an actual fascist would do.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4😁1🌚1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
HOLY CR*P The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill
PENALTIES
- If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000.
- For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million
“SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature”
“I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website.
The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms.
In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law
- If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000
- For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million.
That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks.
— What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups."
“the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law”
This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
PENALTIES
- If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000.
- For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million
“SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature”
“I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website.
The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms.
In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law
- If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000
- For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million.
That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks.
— What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups."
“the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law”
This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬12🌚1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Here’s a video of Israelis protesting for the “right to rape” demanding soldiers be allowed to sexually assault Palestinian detainees
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬10🌚4🤯1