I've seen tons of posts showing hypothetical male and female IQ bell curves that show women having extremely small variances relative to men.
Men are reliably more variable, but the empirical difference is not that extreme.
The ACT results from 2024 are representative:
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Men are reliably more variable, but the empirical difference is not that extreme.
The ACT results from 2024 are representative:
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
NEW - Deers across the U.S. are appearing with tumor-like growths, known as deer cutaneous fibroma or deer warts
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😨2😢1
NEW US sends three warships near Venezuela coast as part of efforts to curb drug trafficking
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Outraged passenger attacks Southwest Airlines gate agent, bashes computer in wild Orlando airport meltdown
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🌚4😱1
DoomPosting
I've seen tons of posts showing hypothetical male and female IQ bell curves that show women having extremely small variances relative to men. Men are reliably more variable, but the empirical difference is not that extreme. The ACT results from 2024 are…
Some big problems with claiming the ACT is an IQ test, using just summary statistics instead of the full data
But ok fine, let’s do this
Mr ChatGPT, pls own these libs
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
But ok fine, let’s do this
Mr ChatGPT, pls own these libs
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😁2👀1
"The Scottish mental survey of 1932 recorded mental ability test scores for nearly all children born in 1921 and at school in Scotland on 1 June 1932." (Hart+03)
Here is the distribution of IQ scores they measured, separated by gender. We see here no significant difference in mean but significant difference in scatter.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Here is the distribution of IQ scores they measured, separated by gender. We see here no significant difference in mean but significant difference in scatter.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯3
When viewed as a log plot, the difference in counts at the tail ends becomes more apparent: In this survey, males were far more common at the extremes
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯1
If you then look at the fractional count of males vs females at a given IQ score, you see this trend even more clearly: Males are significantly more common at the extremes.
Note: Uncertainty bands here are from Poisson estimates, giving the rough counting error. The outermost extremes of the bands in the plots above are thus ~95% certainty bands.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Note: Uncertainty bands here are from Poisson estimates, giving the rough counting error. The outermost extremes of the bands in the plots above are thus ~95% certainty bands.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯1
DoomPosting
Well well well Notice anything? Never forget that 3rd line 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
So the guy outright lied,
as shown in the chart above,
But the real strange thing?
— Whole comments section is filled with hundreds of people who just blindly accepted his BS false presupposition, that the chart shows nothing,
Nearly all instead just skipping over to more minor, secondary issues,
instead of confronting the core lie that the chart shows nothing
Humans are INCREDIBLY vulnerable to being manipulated by false presuppositions
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
as shown in the chart above,
But the real strange thing?
— Whole comments section is filled with hundreds of people who just blindly accepted his BS false presupposition, that the chart shows nothing,
Nearly all instead just skipping over to more minor, secondary issues,
instead of confronting the core lie that the chart shows nothing
Humans are INCREDIBLY vulnerable to being manipulated by false presuppositions
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4