The task length an ai can reliably finish (conservatively) doubles every 7 months
When i'm the age my mom was when she watched me graduate, ai will be able to do tasks that would take someone ~1000 millennia
Donโt believe it? If you told someone in 1965 that a watch in 2025 would be more powerful than the warehouse-sized ibm model 91, i think youโd see similar cope
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ค๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
When i'm the age my mom was when she watched me graduate, ai will be able to do tasks that would take someone ~1000 millennia
Donโt believe it? If you told someone in 1965 that a watch in 2025 would be more powerful than the warehouse-sized ibm model 91, i think youโd see similar cope
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ค๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฅ4
DoomPosting
The task length an ai can reliably finish (conservatively) doubles every 7 months When i'm the age my mom was when she watched me graduate, ai will be able to do tasks that would take someone ~1000 millennia Donโt believe it? If you told someone in 1965โฆ
You MSM-believing retard
Mooreโs Law, the only true original Mooreโs Law, never slowed down in the slightest
Anyone who says otherwise is a retard who likely falls for every lie journalists tell
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Mooreโs Law, the only true original Mooreโs Law, never slowed down in the slightest
Anyone who says otherwise is a retard who likely falls for every lie journalists tell
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฅ2๐ฏ2
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Mooreโs Law is not Dead, but Gordon Moore, RIP (aged 94, January 3, 1929 โ March 24, 2023)
Mooreโs Lawโs has been rewritten by journalists throughout the decades. Few today realize that Mooreโs Lawโs original stated formulation had nothing to do with clock speeds or circuit sizes, but rather:
โcomplexity for minimum component costsโ
Now, โminimum componentโ has changed many times throughout the decades, as indicted by the vague wording in this original formulation, so the best general translation of this concept, in a way that ignores the particular component type and further solidifies the meaning of complexity, is then:
โcalulations / second @ $1 spentโ
In 1965, when Mooreโs Law was coined, it had already been holding strong for ~65 years, across many technology regimes,
(1) Rooms full of human โcomputersโ
(2) Mechanical like Babbageโs
(3) Relays
(4) Vacuum Tubes
(5) Discrete Transistors
โ Mooreโs Law Coined โ
(6) Integrated Circuits
(7) Quantum?
Since then, in the 58 years since Mooreโs Law was coined, it has continued to hold, near-perfectly.
In the future, Mooreโs law will continue to enter new regimes, as it already has many times in the past, perhaps quantum next, but the law will never die.
It has been said that "The number of people predicting the death of Mooreโs Law doubles every two years."
I say "The number of people trying to redefine Moore's Law from its original intent doubles every two years."
Moore's Law slowdown was always a willful lie, told by journalists and attention-seekers fully-aware of their lies.
Few willing to grasp the consequences of unending exponential growth.
Mooreโs Lawโs has been rewritten by journalists throughout the decades. Few today realize that Mooreโs Lawโs original stated formulation had nothing to do with clock speeds or circuit sizes, but rather:
โcomplexity for minimum component costsโ
Now, โminimum componentโ has changed many times throughout the decades, as indicted by the vague wording in this original formulation, so the best general translation of this concept, in a way that ignores the particular component type and further solidifies the meaning of complexity, is then:
โcalulations / second @ $1 spentโ
In 1965, when Mooreโs Law was coined, it had already been holding strong for ~65 years, across many technology regimes,
(1) Rooms full of human โcomputersโ
(2) Mechanical like Babbageโs
(3) Relays
(4) Vacuum Tubes
(5) Discrete Transistors
โ Mooreโs Law Coined โ
(6) Integrated Circuits
(7) Quantum?
Since then, in the 58 years since Mooreโs Law was coined, it has continued to hold, near-perfectly.
In the future, Mooreโs law will continue to enter new regimes, as it already has many times in the past, perhaps quantum next, but the law will never die.
It has been said that "The number of people predicting the death of Mooreโs Law doubles every two years."
I say "The number of people trying to redefine Moore's Law from its original intent doubles every two years."
Moore's Law slowdown was always a willful lie, told by journalists and attention-seekers fully-aware of their lies.
Few willing to grasp the consequences of unending exponential growth.
๐ฅ5๐ฏ2
Forwarded from Chat GPT
First 3 words of article that coined Mooreโs Law โ โWith unit cost fallingโ
Concluding sentence of the introduction - โMachines similar to those in existence today will be built at lower costs and with faster turnaround.โ
Mooreโs Law was always, first and foremost, about
i.e.
All else is journalist lies.
Gordon Mooreโs 1965 Article Coining Mooreโs Law
Concluding sentence of the introduction - โMachines similar to those in existence today will be built at lower costs and with faster turnaround.โ
Mooreโs Law was always, first and foremost, about
Min Cost / Computei.e.
Max Compute / CostAll else is journalist lies.
Gordon Mooreโs 1965 Article Coining Mooreโs Law
๐ฏ2
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Curves that are NOT Mooreโs Law - compute per second per dollar - many of which have fallen off
๐ฏ3
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Compute Per Watt, the true original Mooreโs Law, continues its doubling rate flawlessly
๐ฏ4
DoomPosting
The task length an ai can reliably finish (conservatively) doubles every 7 months When i'm the age my mom was when she watched me graduate, ai will be able to do tasks that would take someone ~1000 millennia Donโt believe it? If you told someone in 1965โฆ
The phones in peopleโs pockets today already do tasks that would take an individual human millions of years to do by hand
Why tf do people say such retarded things so confidently when it comes to tech
High-NFCC NPCs that just repeat nonsense journalists say be gulaged
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Why tf do people say such retarded things so confidently when it comes to tech
High-NFCC NPCs that just repeat nonsense journalists say be gulaged
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ2
California park ranger fired after helping hang transgender pride flag on popular Yosemite monolith
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ค๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ค๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐19โก2