Husband of woman found dead in national forest seen on Ring footage dragging large object from home: report
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π¨4π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€βπ₯7π€¬2
The task length an ai can reliably finish (conservatively) doubles every 7 months
When i'm the age my mom was when she watched me graduate, ai will be able to do tasks that would take someone ~1000 millennia
Donβt believe it? If you told someone in 1965 that a watch in 2025 would be more powerful than the warehouse-sized ibm model 91, i think youβd see similar cope
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
When i'm the age my mom was when she watched me graduate, ai will be able to do tasks that would take someone ~1000 millennia
Donβt believe it? If you told someone in 1965 that a watch in 2025 would be more powerful than the warehouse-sized ibm model 91, i think youβd see similar cope
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π₯4
DoomPosting
The task length an ai can reliably finish (conservatively) doubles every 7 months When i'm the age my mom was when she watched me graduate, ai will be able to do tasks that would take someone ~1000 millennia Donβt believe it? If you told someone in 1965β¦
You MSM-believing retard
Mooreβs Law, the only true original Mooreβs Law, never slowed down in the slightest
Anyone who says otherwise is a retard who likely falls for every lie journalists tell
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Mooreβs Law, the only true original Mooreβs Law, never slowed down in the slightest
Anyone who says otherwise is a retard who likely falls for every lie journalists tell
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π₯2π―2
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Mooreβs Law is not Dead, but Gordon Moore, RIP (aged 94, January 3, 1929 β March 24, 2023)
Mooreβs Lawβs has been rewritten by journalists throughout the decades. Few today realize that Mooreβs Lawβs original stated formulation had nothing to do with clock speeds or circuit sizes, but rather:
βcomplexity for minimum component costsβ
Now, βminimum componentβ has changed many times throughout the decades, as indicted by the vague wording in this original formulation, so the best general translation of this concept, in a way that ignores the particular component type and further solidifies the meaning of complexity, is then:
βcalulations / second @ $1 spentβ
In 1965, when Mooreβs Law was coined, it had already been holding strong for ~65 years, across many technology regimes,
(1) Rooms full of human βcomputersβ
(2) Mechanical like Babbageβs
(3) Relays
(4) Vacuum Tubes
(5) Discrete Transistors
β Mooreβs Law Coined β
(6) Integrated Circuits
(7) Quantum?
Since then, in the 58 years since Mooreβs Law was coined, it has continued to hold, near-perfectly.
In the future, Mooreβs law will continue to enter new regimes, as it already has many times in the past, perhaps quantum next, but the law will never die.
It has been said that "The number of people predicting the death of Mooreβs Law doubles every two years."
I say "The number of people trying to redefine Moore's Law from its original intent doubles every two years."
Moore's Law slowdown was always a willful lie, told by journalists and attention-seekers fully-aware of their lies.
Few willing to grasp the consequences of unending exponential growth.
Mooreβs Lawβs has been rewritten by journalists throughout the decades. Few today realize that Mooreβs Lawβs original stated formulation had nothing to do with clock speeds or circuit sizes, but rather:
βcomplexity for minimum component costsβ
Now, βminimum componentβ has changed many times throughout the decades, as indicted by the vague wording in this original formulation, so the best general translation of this concept, in a way that ignores the particular component type and further solidifies the meaning of complexity, is then:
βcalulations / second @ $1 spentβ
In 1965, when Mooreβs Law was coined, it had already been holding strong for ~65 years, across many technology regimes,
(1) Rooms full of human βcomputersβ
(2) Mechanical like Babbageβs
(3) Relays
(4) Vacuum Tubes
(5) Discrete Transistors
β Mooreβs Law Coined β
(6) Integrated Circuits
(7) Quantum?
Since then, in the 58 years since Mooreβs Law was coined, it has continued to hold, near-perfectly.
In the future, Mooreβs law will continue to enter new regimes, as it already has many times in the past, perhaps quantum next, but the law will never die.
It has been said that "The number of people predicting the death of Mooreβs Law doubles every two years."
I say "The number of people trying to redefine Moore's Law from its original intent doubles every two years."
Moore's Law slowdown was always a willful lie, told by journalists and attention-seekers fully-aware of their lies.
Few willing to grasp the consequences of unending exponential growth.
π₯5π―2