JUST IN: Trump will be making an “announcement” from the Oval Office tomorrow at 4:30pm ET, per the White House
Any ideas?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Any ideas?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
John Brennan now that he is about to be indicted:
We never wrote that Trump colluded with Russia.
John Brennan in the August 16, 2018, op-ed in The New York Times: "Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash. The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of ‘Trump Incorporated’ attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets."
John Brennan 2019: The amount of information that relates to collusion is quite extensive.
Declassified emails:
"HRC approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections...
In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media."
It's hard to really comprehend how big of a scandal this entire situation is.
They tried to usurp and remove a duly elected President of the United States off of information they knew was concocted by Obama, Clinton and the deep state.
How can anyone have faith in our country if criminals like him are walking around freely?
Brennan must face justice.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
We never wrote that Trump colluded with Russia.
John Brennan in the August 16, 2018, op-ed in The New York Times: "Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash. The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of ‘Trump Incorporated’ attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets."
John Brennan 2019: The amount of information that relates to collusion is quite extensive.
Declassified emails:
"HRC approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections...
In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media."
It's hard to really comprehend how big of a scandal this entire situation is.
They tried to usurp and remove a duly elected President of the United States off of information they knew was concocted by Obama, Clinton and the deep state.
How can anyone have faith in our country if criminals like him are walking around freely?
Brennan must face justice.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6
CNN reports that top Trump officials will discuss Epstein strategy in a Wednesday meeting with JD Vance at Vance’s residence.
The team is supposedly weighing whether to publish Ghislaine Maxwell’s recent interview with the DoJ.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
The team is supposedly weighing whether to publish Ghislaine Maxwell’s recent interview with the DoJ.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
In the future you’ll be able to just pay to get back in
Or more specifically, putting up a bond betting that the admin won’t ban the person again,
With the cost of this bond probably naturally probably the more the person gets banned, and ofc others can sponsor you — and the house paying out over time to those who provide content, so 3rd party insurers could easily make back their funds, without broke regular users having to cover it
And for those who intend to repeatedly break the rules — well this just ends up being the allowed cost to break the rules, which ofc is set by the community/admin
— Very much like the new US visa system requiring those from high-risk countries needing to put up a bond
(This is essentially the basis of the new content-submission system we’ve built, will be gradually rolling it out live to more people)
Now some might say — But admins never want anyone to break the rules at all no matter tue price — which ofc is nonsense, it’s never that absolute, there’s nearly always some amount of rule bending available for sale at some price, which then can go back into improving the group, win-win
Thoughts?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Or more specifically, putting up a bond betting that the admin won’t ban the person again,
With the cost of this bond probably naturally probably the more the person gets banned, and ofc others can sponsor you — and the house paying out over time to those who provide content, so 3rd party insurers could easily make back their funds, without broke regular users having to cover it
And for those who intend to repeatedly break the rules — well this just ends up being the allowed cost to break the rules, which ofc is set by the community/admin
— Very much like the new US visa system requiring those from high-risk countries needing to put up a bond
(This is essentially the basis of the new content-submission system we’ve built, will be gradually rolling it out live to more people)
Now some might say — But admins never want anyone to break the rules at all no matter tue price — which ofc is nonsense, it’s never that absolute, there’s nearly always some amount of rule bending available for sale at some price, which then can go back into improving the group, win-win
Thoughts?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😁7❤🔥2💯2
ALERT: A user lost $3.05M to phishing scam just 6 hours ago after signing malicious transaction, according to ScamSniffer.
Stay vigilant and always verify transaction details before signing.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Stay vigilant and always verify transaction details before signing.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀3
LATEST: James Howells abandons landfill excavation for his lost 8,000 $BTC hard drive after 12 years, pivoting to launch DeFi token inspired by his Bitcoin saga instead of continuing physical recovery efforts
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😁2😢2💯1