Would bet that the true zero-sum massive capital sink this cycle
β is perpetuals platforms
Those truly sucking up billions to create absolutely nothing, not even communities
The perp platforms arenβt even trading the real underlying coins, itβs all virtual contracts
Pumpfun still bad and badly misconfigured in many ways,
but overlooking the biggest zero-sum capital sink here
Oh and the real altcoin season is still on the way, always AFTER $BTC gets closer to cycle peak
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
β is perpetuals platforms
Those truly sucking up billions to create absolutely nothing, not even communities
The perp platforms arenβt even trading the real underlying coins, itβs all virtual contracts
Pumpfun still bad and badly misconfigured in many ways,
but overlooking the biggest zero-sum capital sink here
Oh and the real altcoin season is still on the way, always AFTER $BTC gets closer to cycle peak
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―4π1
Billions getting silently swallowed up by the perps platforms now,
much of which likely wouldβve gone toward some kind of value-creating investments,
instead now being used for something of true zero value creation, afaik
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
much of which likely wouldβve gone toward some kind of value-creating investments,
instead now being used for something of true zero value creation, afaik
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―5
Alts performance vs. BTC, measured from BTC cycle bottoms
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π4π2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯8β€βπ₯2π2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π6π―4π€¬2
DoomPosting
Voluntary trade β True essence of the right i.e. (1) Voluntary trade deals, where both sides stand to benefit AND (2) Involuntary forced-elimination of monopolizing entities that have destroyed voluntary mutually-beneficial trade, whoβve destroyed meritβ¦
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Left = non-voluntary, centralized tyranny of the majority, βtrade unionβ = EU
Right = decentralized voluntary trade agreements = disband the EU
That no exchange may take place unless all are part of the deal stand to benefit
Voluntary association
Art of the deal
It really is the central dividing line between left and right
β EU concept is leftist af, to its core, by its very nature
EU is fundamentally an extremely leftist, anti-rightest system of organization
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Right = decentralized voluntary trade agreements = disband the EU
That no exchange may take place unless all are part of the deal stand to benefit
Voluntary association
Art of the deal
It really is the central dividing line between left and right
β EU concept is leftist af, to its core, by its very nature
EU is fundamentally an extremely leftist, anti-rightest system of organization
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π11
DoomPosting
Left = non-voluntary, centralized tyranny of the majority, βtrade unionβ = EU Right = decentralized voluntary trade agreements = disband the EU That no exchange may take place unless all are part of the deal stand to benefit Voluntary association Art ofβ¦
β βBilateral tradeβ to contrast with βMultilateralismβ
BTW, very strange choice of wording,
β Type of terminologyβs a lie on its face, but few seem to realize it?
I.e. βMultilateralismβ implying it has a monopoly on coordination among more than 2 parties,
as if more than 2 parties to coming to a mutually-beneficial terms for voluntary exchange agreement is somehow too hard, if not impossible,
β which DO appear to strongly believe, even on the right
β¦but itβs simply not true at all?
Swear that ~zero even realize the general form that the negotiation offers in such an N-party voluntary exchange negotiation take?
A while back worked on a startup to fully automate this in a trustless way, but world apparently not ready for this yet, and so this will be the next big thing in the next crypto wave
Oddly, did ONCE recently randomly see an old jewish joke online, that correctly identified the general form that such N-party voluntary exchange agreements take⦠which kinda raises more questions than answers
Anyway, usual commie wordcel tricks β words than on their face imply that if more than 2 nations are involved, suddenly you just MUST switch to commie βdemocracyβ tyrrany of the majority of countries, if not a commie central planning committee, e.g. UN.
βBilateralismβ vs βMultilateralismβ distinction is a lie on its face
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
BTW, very strange choice of wording,
β Type of terminologyβs a lie on its face, but few seem to realize it?
I.e. βMultilateralismβ implying it has a monopoly on coordination among more than 2 parties,
as if more than 2 parties to coming to a mutually-beneficial terms for voluntary exchange agreement is somehow too hard, if not impossible,
β which DO appear to strongly believe, even on the right
β¦but itβs simply not true at all?
Swear that ~zero even realize the general form that the negotiation offers in such an N-party voluntary exchange negotiation take?
A while back worked on a startup to fully automate this in a trustless way, but world apparently not ready for this yet, and so this will be the next big thing in the next crypto wave
Oddly, did ONCE recently randomly see an old jewish joke online, that correctly identified the general form that such N-party voluntary exchange agreements take⦠which kinda raises more questions than answers
Anyway, usual commie wordcel tricks β words than on their face imply that if more than 2 nations are involved, suddenly you just MUST switch to commie βdemocracyβ tyrrany of the majority of countries, if not a commie central planning committee, e.g. UN.
βBilateralismβ vs βMultilateralismβ distinction is a lie on its face
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―6