Forwarded from Chadposting πΏπΏπΏ
π COIN ALERT:
β οΈWARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Macro Conditions:
ββ VERY BAD (38) = DO NOT BUY NEW LAUNCHES (11.7m)
Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
Entry Cap: $1_203_125Entry Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 at 8:35 AM ESTSymbol: $TANZANIAName: OFFICIAL TANZANIAAnnounced: 1738762513Signal-1: 0.120 β οΈSignal-2: 3.317 β
β
β
Liquidity: $131_507Created: 23.7m agoRefreshed: 9.0s agoAddress: 9FTsV2o25JLokK12DcfXFHE5cQF9yEjGrCWLKAT5pumpFrom: β‘Dexscreener Top BoostedLinks: Dexscreener | Twitter Search | Pumpfunβ οΈWARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Min Liquidity: β
$75.9k ($131.5k)Min Signal-1: β
0.090 (0.120)Min Signal-2: β
1.500 (3.317)Min Cap: β
$1.2M ($1.2M)Min Age: β
0.0s (23.8m)Max Age: β
2.0d (23.8m)Macro Conditions:
ββ VERY BAD (38) = DO NOT BUY NEW LAUNCHES (11.7m)
Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
π3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Supposed proof of realness this guy uploaded to his twitter just now
Tweet link
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Tweet link
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π3
DoomPosting
Supposed proof of realness this guy uploaded to his twitter just now Tweet link π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
The guy is a supposed African billionaire, with 2.2 million twitter followers
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―1π1
DoomPosting
The guy is a supposed African billionaire, with 2.2 million twitter followers π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Tweet link
Argument for it being real? β Trump did it, now so can the other rich dudes too
Continuing to research deeper
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Argument for it being real? β Trump did it, now so can the other rich dudes too
Continuing to research deeper
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π3
DoomPosting
Tweet link Argument for it being real? β Trump did it, now so can the other rich dudes too Continuing to research deeper π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Basic forensic error analysis comes back clean,
Unlike in some of the recent hacks
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Unlike in some of the recent hacks
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π4
DoomPosting
Chat is this real β Or another hack π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Continuing upward, currently 3x - 4x
Rediculous time to launch a coin, but letβs see what happens
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Rediculous time to launch a coin, but letβs see what happens
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π5
Heβs got a spaces scheduled for 9 min from now
Letβs see if that pumps it or dumps it
Spaces link
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Letβs see if that pumps it or dumps it
Spaces link
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―2π2
DoomPosting
9gag CEO on $PAIN presale Letβs see what happensβ¦ π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
$PAIN presale update 2 hours ago
Apparently theyβre saying that the liquidity would be too thick if they used all $40M that was raised,
and so theyβre refunding 80%?
= Refunding $32M and using the remaining $8M for liquidity?
Will run the calculations myself next, butβ¦
β¦Maybe that is legit reasoning?
$BOME was already one of the thickest launches ever, with just $1.6M of SOL & 50% of the token supply put into the pool at launch
And a strange artifact of these constant-product pools is that the thickness of the token at launch is kinda set in stone once created, incentives wise β long story, but, essentially
And indeed the thicker the liquidity, the more money needed to pump the price
For comparison, pumpfun pools are configured to have WAY TOO THIN liquidity, which is why IMO even the hottest pumpfun coins like $PNUT have crashed down much harder than e.g. $BOME did β all about that thickness. Easy rise easy fall.
So,
Bull case:
(1) They want the liquidity a little thinner than the insane thickness that adding $40M would do, giving it a little more pumpfun-like pop, just a little
(2) But, even with $8M, it would still be among the thickest liquidity pools ever, if they put it all in a raydium constant product pool, like most do β so still would be plenty thick
(3) BIG ONE: theyβve proven huge demand, and that huge amount of refunded money might be highly likely to go right back into buying $PAIN?
(4) But they donβt want to manage easy-to-screw-up task of doing all those post-launch buys with the funds themselves, so given the massive demand and likelihood of refunded buyers buying β they expect it to be easier to just refund 80% to the users and let them do the buys?
(5) Oh, also theyβre refunding $SOL that was sent late. Very non-scammy nice thing for them to do β plenty of βlegitβ projects have just pocketed that late money as a donation.
Bear case:
You tell me?
At least so far, and if things continue to go according to this plan, $PAIN is starting to look great af?
Tweet link
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Apparently theyβre saying that the liquidity would be too thick if they used all $40M that was raised,
and so theyβre refunding 80%?
= Refunding $32M and using the remaining $8M for liquidity?
Will run the calculations myself next, butβ¦
β¦Maybe that is legit reasoning?
$BOME was already one of the thickest launches ever, with just $1.6M of SOL & 50% of the token supply put into the pool at launch
And a strange artifact of these constant-product pools is that the thickness of the token at launch is kinda set in stone once created, incentives wise β long story, but, essentially
And indeed the thicker the liquidity, the more money needed to pump the price
For comparison, pumpfun pools are configured to have WAY TOO THIN liquidity, which is why IMO even the hottest pumpfun coins like $PNUT have crashed down much harder than e.g. $BOME did β all about that thickness. Easy rise easy fall.
So,
Bull case:
(1) They want the liquidity a little thinner than the insane thickness that adding $40M would do, giving it a little more pumpfun-like pop, just a little
(2) But, even with $8M, it would still be among the thickest liquidity pools ever, if they put it all in a raydium constant product pool, like most do β so still would be plenty thick
(3) BIG ONE: theyβve proven huge demand, and that huge amount of refunded money might be highly likely to go right back into buying $PAIN?
(4) But they donβt want to manage easy-to-screw-up task of doing all those post-launch buys with the funds themselves, so given the massive demand and likelihood of refunded buyers buying β they expect it to be easier to just refund 80% to the users and let them do the buys?
(5) Oh, also theyβre refunding $SOL that was sent late. Very non-scammy nice thing for them to do β plenty of βlegitβ projects have just pocketed that late money as a donation.
Bear case:
You tell me?
At least so far, and if things continue to go according to this plan, $PAIN is starting to look great af?
Tweet link
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π4π―2