Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π5π3
Feb 3rd 2025 was the biggest liquidation event in crypto history
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π±9π«‘3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Australian politician Allegra Spencer calls for more hate speech laws because paedophiles aren't protected under the current legislation
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π€¬15π1
Vibe continues to deteriorate
Wouldnβt be surprised if one more quick hard dump before the market resumes upward
Good thing about it quickly deteriorating is that this likely means the bounce back up will be similarly quick
β¦once the move back up finally resumes
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Wouldnβt be surprised if one more quick hard dump before the market resumes upward
Good thing about it quickly deteriorating is that this likely means the bounce back up will be similarly quick
β¦once the move back up finally resumes
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π4π«‘3π―1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π«‘3β€βπ₯1π±1
Forwarded from Chadposting πΏπΏπΏ
π COIN ALERT:
β οΈWARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
Entry Cap: $2_078_602Symbol: $STONKSName: STONKSAnnounced: 1737596587Signal-1: 0.238 β οΈβ οΈSignal-2: 0.239 βLiquidity: $342_615Created: 1.5h agoRefreshed: 52.9s agoAddress: 6NcdiK8B5KK2DzKvzvCfqi8EHaEqu48fyEzC8Mm9pumpFrom: β‘Dexscreener Top BoostedLinks: Dexscreener | Twitter Search | Pumpfunβ οΈWARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Min Liquidity: β
$75.9k ($342.6k)Min Signal-1: β
0.090 (0.238)Min Signal-2: β 1.500 (0.239)Min Cap: β
$1.2M ($2.1M)Min Age: β
30.0m (1.5h)Max Age: β
4.0d (1.5h)Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
π«‘2
Checking out how some of the strongest portfolio performers have been doing
Some of these charts pretty wild
E.g. $STONKS,
up 22.1x from entry,
$2.1M β 600k β $46.0M
MASSIVE drawdown on this one
Really reinforcing the buy & hold to moon or zero strategy
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Some of these charts pretty wild
E.g. $STONKS,
up 22.1x from entry,
$2.1M β 600k β $46.0M
MASSIVE drawdown on this one
Really reinforcing the buy & hold to moon or zero strategy
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π«‘2π€―1π―1
Trump says he wants trade Ukraine rare earths for US military aide
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π₯4π3π3π’2
DoomPosting
Trump says he wants trade Ukraine rare earths for US military aide π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Zelensky responds to Trump
Agrees in principle with Trumpβs trade offer of Ukraineβs rare earth minerals for US military aide
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Agrees in principle with Trumpβs trade offer of Ukraineβs rare earth minerals for US military aide
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π4π3π3π2
DoomPosting
Zelensky responds to Trump Agrees in principle with Trumpβs trade offer of Ukraineβs rare earth minerals for US military aide π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Anyone started to notice yet, that all nearly every time big T offers something,
it always takes the same general form?
= TRADE
Ever notice that whenever the left did something, it always took a very different form?
= guilt tripping, βneedβ-based instead of βtradeβ-based, βequityβ redistribution, always unilateral, NEVER a trade where both sides agree to give something, and both sides stand to benefit
β And if you remember, this is the most fundamental, central principle of the right, of markets themselves,
"The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit."
True right frames EVERYTHING in terms of trade, refuses to trade unless both sides stand to benefit
(Or otherwise acts to fix broken markets, so that proper trade may again occur)
That Big Tβs 1987 claim-to-fame book was literally about constructing good trades,
β Is perhaps the strongest evidence in support of him being true right-wing to the core
Trade -vs- βEquityβ, think about it
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
it always takes the same general form?
= TRADE
Ever notice that whenever the left did something, it always took a very different form?
= guilt tripping, βneedβ-based instead of βtradeβ-based, βequityβ redistribution, always unilateral, NEVER a trade where both sides agree to give something, and both sides stand to benefit
β And if you remember, this is the most fundamental, central principle of the right, of markets themselves,
"The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit."
True right frames EVERYTHING in terms of trade, refuses to trade unless both sides stand to benefit
(Or otherwise acts to fix broken markets, so that proper trade may again occur)
That Big Tβs 1987 claim-to-fame book was literally about constructing good trades,
β Is perhaps the strongest evidence in support of him being true right-wing to the core
Trade -vs- βEquityβ, think about it
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―7
DoomPosting
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Voluntary trade
β True essence of the right
i.e.
(1) Voluntary trade deals, where both sides stand to benefit
AND
(2) Involuntary forced-elimination of monopolizing entities that have destroyed voluntary mutually-beneficial trade, whoβve destroyed merit-based allocation of resources and control
(And yes, property rights and merit-based allocation are somewhat in tension, but in most cases itβs pretty clear)
Trade, not equity
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
β True essence of the right
i.e.
(1) Voluntary trade deals, where both sides stand to benefit
AND
(2) Involuntary forced-elimination of monopolizing entities that have destroyed voluntary mutually-beneficial trade, whoβve destroyed merit-based allocation of resources and control
(And yes, property rights and merit-based allocation are somewhat in tension, but in most cases itβs pretty clear)
Trade, not equity
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―6
Close, but reversed
They force the sh&tty ideology down everyoneβs throats in persuit of their βequityβ goal
Replacing markets and voluntary trade with negative-sum βequityβ forced wealth redistribution IS their real goal
Their issue is never the issue
Their real issue is always their communist revolution
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
They force the sh&tty ideology down everyoneβs throats in persuit of their βequityβ goal
Replacing markets and voluntary trade with negative-sum βequityβ forced wealth redistribution IS their real goal
Their issue is never the issue
Their real issue is always their communist revolution
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―5β‘2
DoomPosting
Zelensky responds to Trump Agrees in principle with Trumpβs trade offer of Ukraineβs rare earth minerals for US military aide π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Zelensky previously, when pleading with leftist leaders:
βIf you cannot give us some financial support, okay please give us credit and we will give you back money.β
β Will again repeat that
LEFTβs prefered style
= Loans & credit scores
RIGHTβs preferred style
= Investments & trade of something other than money for fixed amount of future money
Both do a bit of both, but clearly thereβs a very strong opposing preference that each side has, for one or the other
Never heard anyone point this out, but clearly seems true
Left prefers loans
Right prefers investment trade deals
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
βIf you cannot give us some financial support, okay please give us credit and we will give you back money.β
β Will again repeat that
LEFTβs prefered style
= Loans & credit scores
RIGHTβs preferred style
= Investments & trade of something other than money for fixed amount of future money
Both do a bit of both, but clearly thereβs a very strong opposing preference that each side has, for one or the other
Never heard anyone point this out, but clearly seems true
Left prefers loans
Right prefers investment trade deals
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―6π1
How the market feels after the first REAL ~-38% pullback of the bull cycle
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π6π₯4π―3π1
How big was $SOLβs most recent drawdown, from ATH to subsequent low?
= ((271.92 - 176.01) / 271.92) * 100
= -35%
Another drop coming, to drop it to -38%?
Or was that the local bottom for now?
(In theory should be able to make an expected-max-drawdown-percent versus market cap calculation, based on Bitcoinβs volatility vs market cap over time
β And then apply that to other coins like $SOL, to see what itβs expected drawdown should be now, for each of these mini-pullbacks
Will do that sometime, to see how well that works)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
= ((271.92 - 176.01) / 271.92) * 100
= -35%
Another drop coming, to drop it to -38%?
Or was that the local bottom for now?
(In theory should be able to make an expected-max-drawdown-percent versus market cap calculation, based on Bitcoinβs volatility vs market cap over time
β And then apply that to other coins like $SOL, to see what itβs expected drawdown should be now, for each of these mini-pullbacks
Will do that sometime, to see how well that works)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π2