Majors dump overnight,
Suddenly tons of the new launches looking like this
โ But majors may be back on the climb
Letโs see
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Suddenly tons of the new launches looking like this
โ But majors may be back on the climb
Letโs see
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5
1M follower twitter account got hacked
Now keeps posting pumpfun links, rugging them, deleting the tweet, and then posting another
Many such cases
Many
โ And this is why itโs always very important to firmly establish provenance
A tweet from the famous personโs account, by itself, often just isnโt strong enough proof of provenance โ unless it has a video of them endorsing it or something
Need more
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Now keeps posting pumpfun links, rugging them, deleting the tweet, and then posting another
Many such cases
Many
โ And this is why itโs always very important to firmly establish provenance
A tweet from the famous personโs account, by itself, often just isnโt strong enough proof of provenance โ unless it has a video of them endorsing it or something
Need more
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ7๐1
(A) Pure memes,
Where no one really likes the coin for any reason other than numba-goes-up
โ Letโs be honest, would you really still love the meme, if you lost a bunch of money on it?
= Fall back to earth hard, when number stops going up,
because numba-goes-up was all they liked,
so when that dissapears suddenly thereโs nothing
When they dump, they dump hard, and often permanently
โvsโ
(B) E.g. startup coins, which still have big price volatility,
But when price pulls back itโs not like they suddenly have nothing anymore,
People can still be fanatic about a product or strong movement even if the price tanks for a while
Not just evaporating into literally nothing the moment the price goes down
I.e.
MANY possible reasons the coins could have value,
โ But if youโre still investing based on pure memes,
i.e. liking the thing JUST because the price goes up, if youโre being honest with yourself, with literally nothing else redeeming about it
โ Then youโre an absolute idiot and thereโs no saving you at this point
Memecoins are not really about the memes
They can be about many different things, anti-establishment movements like $PNUT, they can be about startups, they can be about many things, they can be about someone rich or famous not wanting to ruin a reputation that they greatly care about, or not wanting to lose big unhedgeable money that they put on the line
Memecoins can be about MANY different things
โ But memecoins are NOT about the memes,
Not just about making the price go up
Or else price instantly crashes down just as hard
0-days old early-stage investing was never about technical analysis, never just about price movement, though that can have some minor role
โ This was never the domain where technical analysis reigned
Entirely different type of investment assessment always reigned in this 0-days old domain
Memecoins are not about the price alone
Memecoins are not about the memes
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Where no one really likes the coin for any reason other than numba-goes-up
โ Letโs be honest, would you really still love the meme, if you lost a bunch of money on it?
= Fall back to earth hard, when number stops going up,
because numba-goes-up was all they liked,
so when that dissapears suddenly thereโs nothing
When they dump, they dump hard, and often permanently
โvsโ
(B) E.g. startup coins, which still have big price volatility,
But when price pulls back itโs not like they suddenly have nothing anymore,
People can still be fanatic about a product or strong movement even if the price tanks for a while
Not just evaporating into literally nothing the moment the price goes down
I.e.
MANY possible reasons the coins could have value,
โ But if youโre still investing based on pure memes,
i.e. liking the thing JUST because the price goes up, if youโre being honest with yourself, with literally nothing else redeeming about it
โ Then youโre an absolute idiot and thereโs no saving you at this point
Memecoins are not really about the memes
They can be about many different things, anti-establishment movements like $PNUT, they can be about startups, they can be about many things, they can be about someone rich or famous not wanting to ruin a reputation that they greatly care about, or not wanting to lose big unhedgeable money that they put on the line
Memecoins can be about MANY different things
โ But memecoins are NOT about the memes,
Not just about making the price go up
Or else price instantly crashes down just as hard
0-days old early-stage investing was never about technical analysis, never just about price movement, though that can have some minor role
โ This was never the domain where technical analysis reigned
Entirely different type of investment assessment always reigned in this 0-days old domain
Memecoins are not about the price alone
Memecoins are not about the memes
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5๐คฏ2
DoomPosting
(A) Pure memes, Where no one really likes the coin for any reason other than numba-goes-up โ Letโs be honest, would you really still love the meme, if you lost a bunch of money on it? = Fall back to earth hard, when number stops going up, because numbaโฆ
FWIW, memes are definitely something that should have some humorous nature
(First definition says typically, but more accurately to say definitely, and any cases otherwise are simply someone misusing the word meme)
Not humorous in any way to anyone โ not a "memeโ
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
(First definition says typically, but more accurately to say definitely, and any cases otherwise are simply someone misusing the word meme)
Not humorous in any way to anyone โ not a "memeโ
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐คฏ3๐ฏ1๐1
Ever look at the top market cap โmemecoinsโ?
โ Which is where you should be looking, if you care about landing the โone deal that returns the funโ winner instead of just lighting your money on fire
Ever notice how virtually NONE of them are good โmemesโ?
โฆand almost NONE of them are even โmemesโ at all?
The โmemeโ in memecoin is a lie
Memecoins are not about the memes
Youโll just keep losing money on pump&dump garbage until you get this through your thick head
But most will refuse to get this
Accepting this means they have no clue what theyโre doing and are never gonna make it
Accept it
Memecoins are not really about โmemesโ at all, rather other thing(s)
Memecoins are not about the memes
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
โ Which is where you should be looking, if you care about landing the โone deal that returns the funโ winner instead of just lighting your money on fire
Ever notice how virtually NONE of them are good โmemesโ?
โฆand almost NONE of them are even โmemesโ at all?
The โmemeโ in memecoin is a lie
Memecoins are not about the memes
Youโll just keep losing money on pump&dump garbage until you get this through your thick head
But most will refuse to get this
Accepting this means they have no clue what theyโre doing and are never gonna make it
Accept it
Memecoins are not really about โmemesโ at all, rather other thing(s)
Memecoins are not about the memes
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5๐คฏ3
Why do you believe that memecoins are really about the โmemesโ?
Why do you believe that โgood memeโ is the primary thing that gives memecoins value?
In part, probably because you fell for the name, โmemecoinโ
Bro, thatโs like believing hotdogs are made from โdogโโฆ
But bigger reason is because you spend all day studying this pumpfun trending trash, because youโre so desperate
โ which IS nearly 100% memes
Instead of studying what you should be studying, the top marketcap โmemecoinsโ
โ which are nearly 0% memes
Winners study the winners
Losers study the losers
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Why do you believe that โgood memeโ is the primary thing that gives memecoins value?
In part, probably because you fell for the name, โmemecoinโ
Bro, thatโs like believing hotdogs are made from โdogโโฆ
But bigger reason is because you spend all day studying this pumpfun trending trash, because youโre so desperate
โ which IS nearly 100% memes
Instead of studying what you should be studying, the top marketcap โmemecoinsโ
โ which are nearly 0% memes
Winners study the winners
Losers study the losers
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ4๐1
Now letโs study the top winners on meme-filled pumpfun
Andโฆ wait a minute
Suddenly not 100% โmemesโ
Suddenly very few of the top ones are just โmemesโ โ and when you look closer, you start to wonder if a single one was actually a case of just a good meme
Look at them,
+ Startup / AI startup type coins $GOAT, $ACT1, $ZEREBRO, $VINE, $JELLYJELLY, $GRIFFAIN, $LMT, $ARC
+ Or spinoffs from the rich startup coins, e.g. $FARTCOIN
+ Movement type coins, that are all about the people and not their flag, $PNUT, $ELON4AFD
+ A few around a viral moment but not at all about the depicted โmemeโ, which is neither a meme nor recognizable at all, e.g. $UFD
+ A MINORITY exceptions which may actually be meme + huge money insiders getting onboard from the start, e.g. $MOODENG, $MICHI, $CHILLGUY, $WOULD
+ Some which appear to be pure memes, but if you look closer were started by & backed by major rich celebrity VCs, e.g. $PIPPIN
The โmemeโ in memecoin is a lie
Meme coins are not about the memes
Winners study winners
Losers study losers
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Andโฆ wait a minute
Suddenly not 100% โmemesโ
Suddenly very few of the top ones are just โmemesโ โ and when you look closer, you start to wonder if a single one was actually a case of just a good meme
Look at them,
+ Startup / AI startup type coins $GOAT, $ACT1, $ZEREBRO, $VINE, $JELLYJELLY, $GRIFFAIN, $LMT, $ARC
+ Or spinoffs from the rich startup coins, e.g. $FARTCOIN
+ Movement type coins, that are all about the people and not their flag, $PNUT, $ELON4AFD
+ A few around a viral moment but not at all about the depicted โmemeโ, which is neither a meme nor recognizable at all, e.g. $UFD
+ A MINORITY exceptions which may actually be meme + huge money insiders getting onboard from the start, e.g. $MOODENG, $MICHI, $CHILLGUY, $WOULD
+ Some which appear to be pure memes, but if you look closer were started by & backed by major rich celebrity VCs, e.g. $PIPPIN
The โmemeโ in memecoin is a lie
Meme coins are not about the memes
Winners study winners
Losers study losers
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ7
In memecoins, the reason has to be some arguably-rational expectation-of-future-value-creation reason
โ As opposed to โletโs just refuse to sell broโ zero-sum type reason, which does NOT work out well in memecoins at all
Irrationally refusing breaks down in reality, e.g. the MANY โWhat if we all heldโ coins that keep appearing, e.g. this one from yesterday ^
Instead to be some rational expectation of value creation
Note: You do NOT have to AGREE that itโs a good rational future-value-creation reason, just any people with enough money must agree that it is a real rational future-value-creation reason
โ Not just zero sum holding and no one ever pulling outโฆ Or zero sum hoping to lure in other suckers on a zero-sum ponzu
Such ponzus can stay alive in other situations, where the ponzu operators enforce restrictions preventing their collapse
But that doesnโt work in memecoins โ nothing to stop the โletโs just hold broโ ones from VERY QUICKLY collapsing, which they do
I.e. yes, mechanically, it works out to some not selling
โ But the type of REASON as for why theyโre not selling is HUGELY important in determining whether the thing will survive long enough to reach huge market caps
E.g. pure ponzu-style letโs just not sell, to attract more people who also wonโt sell, and nothing more than that โ Very bad reason, works very briefly, but then collapses fast, in memecoins
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
โ As opposed to โletโs just refuse to sell broโ zero-sum type reason, which does NOT work out well in memecoins at all
Irrationally refusing breaks down in reality, e.g. the MANY โWhat if we all heldโ coins that keep appearing, e.g. this one from yesterday ^
Instead to be some rational expectation of value creation
Note: You do NOT have to AGREE that itโs a good rational future-value-creation reason, just any people with enough money must agree that it is a real rational future-value-creation reason
โ Not just zero sum holding and no one ever pulling outโฆ Or zero sum hoping to lure in other suckers on a zero-sum ponzu
Such ponzus can stay alive in other situations, where the ponzu operators enforce restrictions preventing their collapse
But that doesnโt work in memecoins โ nothing to stop the โletโs just hold broโ ones from VERY QUICKLY collapsing, which they do
I.e. yes, mechanically, it works out to some not selling
โ But the type of REASON as for why theyโre not selling is HUGELY important in determining whether the thing will survive long enough to reach huge market caps
E.g. pure ponzu-style letโs just not sell, to attract more people who also wonโt sell, and nothing more than that โ Very bad reason, works very briefly, but then collapses fast, in memecoins
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5
Utility coins are just one of many arguably-rational value-creation options
(As opposed to purely zero-sum, letโs just hold bro.)
E.g. the movement coins, raising money for supporters of a movement, who the rich movement supporters genuinely believe creates net value that will be returned to the people โ Note that often only the FIRST major coin of its kind covering a certain people movement works, in these cases.
Endless arguably-value-creating method possibilities,
Though realistically they break down into a few categories being most common general categories
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
(As opposed to purely zero-sum, letโs just hold bro.)
E.g. the movement coins, raising money for supporters of a movement, who the rich movement supporters genuinely believe creates net value that will be returned to the people โ Note that often only the FIRST major coin of its kind covering a certain people movement works, in these cases.
Endless arguably-value-creating method possibilities,
Though realistically they break down into a few categories being most common general categories
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5
DoomPosting
Now letโs study the top winners on meme-filled pumpfun Andโฆ wait a minute Suddenly not 100% โmemesโ Suddenly very few of the top ones are just โmemesโ โ and when you look closer, you start to wonder if a single one was actually a case of just a good memeโฆ
$LUIGI very clearly in the โflag of a people movementโ category,
(1) Not funny at all, not to anyone, basically
(2) Not about the thing being depicted at all,
$LUIGI about taking down the evils of insurance and health care, not as much about the one schizo dude himself
$PNUT about taking down the horribly-behaving big state, not so much about the one squirrel itself
$ELON4AFD about the movement and what it stands for and hardly about elon himself,
Etc
Memecoins are not really about the memes
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
(1) Not funny at all, not to anyone, basically
(2) Not about the thing being depicted at all,
$LUIGI about taking down the evils of insurance and health care, not as much about the one schizo dude himself
$PNUT about taking down the horribly-behaving big state, not so much about the one squirrel itself
$ELON4AFD about the movement and what it stands for and hardly about elon himself,
Etc
Memecoins are not really about the memes
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5
DoomPosting
FWIW, memes are definitely something that should have some humorous nature (First definition says typically, but more accurately to say definitely, and any cases otherwise are simply someone misusing the word meme) Not humorous in any way to anyone โ notโฆ
Apparently controversy over the meaning of meme is so common that many of Googleโs top suggestions are about this dispute
Probably caused by the dude who coined the word โmemeโ being a retard and trying to change and shape the word into some meaningless bs over the years, instead of allowing the linguistically useful concept he accidentally discovered take control
Real words are discovered, not invented
No different than Satoshi, who half-incorrectly-discovered the Bitcoin mechanism, coming in and saying we must revert to how he originally coded it
= essentially using cumulative work forward โ instead of cumulative work backward
โ Which was a HORRIBLE mistake that would instantly destroy Bitcoin if reverted to now, making it instantly cheaply attackable
โ No one would accept this โrevertingโ to that โoriginalโ Bitcoin meaning, no matter what the original Bitcoin author wanted
Same with all real words
Just because the dude who half-incorrectly-discovered and coined the thing originally has some retarded idea, doesnโt mean he gets to dictate the meaning
Real words are discovered, not invented
Death of the author
La mort de l'auteur
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Probably caused by the dude who coined the word โmemeโ being a retard and trying to change and shape the word into some meaningless bs over the years, instead of allowing the linguistically useful concept he accidentally discovered take control
Real words are discovered, not invented
No different than Satoshi, who half-incorrectly-discovered the Bitcoin mechanism, coming in and saying we must revert to how he originally coded it
= essentially using cumulative work forward โ instead of cumulative work backward
โ Which was a HORRIBLE mistake that would instantly destroy Bitcoin if reverted to now, making it instantly cheaply attackable
โ No one would accept this โrevertingโ to that โoriginalโ Bitcoin meaning, no matter what the original Bitcoin author wanted
Same with all real words
Just because the dude who half-incorrectly-discovered and coined the thing originally has some retarded idea, doesnโt mean he gets to dictate the meaning
Real words are discovered, not invented
Death of the author
La mort de l'auteur
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ4
DoomPosting
Apparently controversy over the meaning of meme is so common that many of Googleโs top suggestions are about this dispute Probably caused by the dude who coined the word โmemeโ being a retard and trying to change and shape the word into some meaningless bsโฆ
Guess another way of looking at why people who insist on blending together many different concepts under the single word โmemeโ
โ Is them being just like the retarded primitive tribes, who blended together all color names into just one of: black, white, or red.
I.e. stage 2 primitive retards on the โColor Terms Hierarchyโ
Yes, if you insist on blending together words with wildly distinct meanings, even when it wrecks the usefulness of the word for the tasks at hand
โ Youโre literally being a primitive tribe retard
Basic Color Terms Hierarchy, and the Universality of their Evolution
Words are discovered, not invented
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
โ Is them being just like the retarded primitive tribes, who blended together all color names into just one of: black, white, or red.
I.e. stage 2 primitive retards on the โColor Terms Hierarchyโ
Yes, if you insist on blending together words with wildly distinct meanings, even when it wrecks the usefulness of the word for the tasks at hand
โ Youโre literally being a primitive tribe retard
Basic Color Terms Hierarchy, and the Universality of their Evolution
Words are discovered, not invented
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ3๐ฅ1