Beware the blatant scammers who were claiming far bigger returns than possible on $TRUMP
Those ~100% fake
Real huge opportunities coming next β but not from those frauds
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Those ~100% fake
Real huge opportunities coming next β but not from those frauds
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―4
99_553/819_430
= $0.12 each
But the charts show $TRUMP launching at a price of
= $0.63 each
And so,
$0.12 < $0.63
= Impossible to have gotten in that early?
I.e. these screenshots claiming huge fumbles are massive lies too?
Beware subscribing to the feeds of these massive frauds
β And this is the big problem of someone showing real receipts,
Real receipts for incredible massive 250x to 750x wins look pathetic next to these fraudulent 1,000,000x nonsense
β If everyone is falling for these nonsense
Suddenly the legit great wins look bad next to the fakes
Market for lemons if you blindly believe whoever shows the biggest number β which will end up being 100% frauds, because lying about the biggest number is trivial to do when no one checks the receipts
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
= $0.12 each
But the charts show $TRUMP launching at a price of
= $0.63 each
And so,
$0.12 < $0.63
= Impossible to have gotten in that early?
I.e. these screenshots claiming huge fumbles are massive lies too?
Beware subscribing to the feeds of these massive frauds
β And this is the big problem of someone showing real receipts,
Real receipts for incredible massive 250x to 750x wins look pathetic next to these fraudulent 1,000,000x nonsense
β If everyone is falling for these nonsense
Suddenly the legit great wins look bad next to the fakes
Market for lemons if you blindly believe whoever shows the biggest number β which will end up being 100% frauds, because lying about the biggest number is trivial to do when no one checks the receipts
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π2π―1
Ok on the DLMM pool there was $0.18
Still above $0.12
Beware the fakers, who take the faking way too far into pure nonsense territory
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Still above $0.12
Beware the fakers, who take the faking way too far into pure nonsense territory
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―2
Dude who posted it
Lambo and flipping people off in profile header
500 followers
Supposedly constantly hitting 100xβs on huge bets
β¦but doing a paid discord for scraps
Math simply not adding up at all on his supposed wins
Yeah, 100% larp, Iβd bet big
Math on these these lambo fraud dudes just doesnβt add up
Beware
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Lambo and flipping people off in profile header
500 followers
Supposedly constantly hitting 100xβs on huge bets
β¦but doing a paid discord for scraps
Math simply not adding up at all on his supposed wins
Yeah, 100% larp, Iβd bet big
Math on these these lambo fraud dudes just doesnβt add up
Beware
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―7
DoomPosting
Why are influencers constantly calling cycle-top? Why are some memecoin community members constantly spreading easily-disprovable morale-destroying lies? β They love the attention, simple as that They know theyβre lying They just donβt care who or whatβ¦
βThere were also those who added to our real perils by inventing fictitious gainz. Some claimed to have bought $TRUMP at $0.12 or that another $ETH was on fire. It was untrue, but they could always find somebody to believe them.β
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π3π₯1
$TRUMP ~10x was good β but not (yet) great, for those taking the classic VC-style investing approach, which you should
In fact 10x would still be considered a βfailureβ, by the classic VC rules of thumb
= 50x has always been the rule-of-thumb minimum to be considered βsuccessβ in classic VC portfolio strategy
Because need to overcome all the losers too
So, by itself, so far, $TRUMP was good but definitely not enough for success on its own
What IS great is that it has huge liquidity, enabling far more of those with 10x gains to reinvest into other coins, which could quickly 100x.
β Still entirely possible $TRUMP does >50x, but at the same time, 10x is FAR too early, by the classic VC rules of thumb, to call it a huge success yet
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
In fact 10x would still be considered a βfailureβ, by the classic VC rules of thumb
= 50x has always been the rule-of-thumb minimum to be considered βsuccessβ in classic VC portfolio strategy
Because need to overcome all the losers too
So, by itself, so far, $TRUMP was good but definitely not enough for success on its own
What IS great is that it has huge liquidity, enabling far more of those with 10x gains to reinvest into other coins, which could quickly 100x.
β Still entirely possible $TRUMP does >50x, but at the same time, 10x is FAR too early, by the classic VC rules of thumb, to call it a huge success yet
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―3
Not exaggerating to say that 50x is the bare minimum in classic early-stage VC strategy,
And if you try to lock in a guaranteed win at e.g. 5x or 10x, rather than shooting for 50x+
β The VCs will tell you, βbro, wtf are you doingβ
Shoot for the stars is the rule in the early-stage regime
Not because theyβre moon-chasers
But literally because the math of early-stage investing requires it
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
And if you try to lock in a guaranteed win at e.g. 5x or 10x, rather than shooting for 50x+
β The VCs will tell you, βbro, wtf are you doingβ
Shoot for the stars is the rule in the early-stage regime
Not because theyβre moon-chasers
But literally because the math of early-stage investing requires it
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―3π2
Memecoiners β
What business are you in?
Extreme outcomes drive returns
50x+ are all that matters
Nature of the beast
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
What business are you in?
Extreme outcomes drive returns
50x+ are all that matters
Nature of the beast
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―3
Another classic VC rule of thumb, β1/3, 1/3, 1/3β
i.e.
33% β are 100% loss, straight to $0
33% β are ~1x, break-even
33% β are the bulk of returns
Which turns out to be partially right, in that ~66% either return 0 or break-even
β But off on that last 33%,
Because in practice itβs really more like just ONE SINGLE INVESTMENT, maybe 2,
MAKING THE RETURNS THAT SAVE THE WHOLE REST OF THE PORTFOLIO
β And if you miss that one 500x or 2000x big one, then youβre dead, just completely dead
Finito
β Which is why in these things you really can never sleep,
Always must be watching
Because you miss that 1 huge hit and your whole portfolio is
DEAD
This is also why it can make sense to partially outsource such a thing to competent people instead of all doing yourself, to have someone always watching, not miss the big one in your sleep
Miss the 1 or 2 big ones and youβre DEAD
Nature of the beast
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
i.e.
33% β are 100% loss, straight to $0
33% β are ~1x, break-even
33% β are the bulk of returns
Which turns out to be partially right, in that ~66% either return 0 or break-even
β But off on that last 33%,
Because in practice itβs really more like just ONE SINGLE INVESTMENT, maybe 2,
MAKING THE RETURNS THAT SAVE THE WHOLE REST OF THE PORTFOLIO
β And if you miss that one 500x or 2000x big one, then youβre dead, just completely dead
Finito
β Which is why in these things you really can never sleep,
Always must be watching
Because you miss that 1 huge hit and your whole portfolio is
DEAD
This is also why it can make sense to partially outsource such a thing to competent people instead of all doing yourself, to have someone always watching, not miss the big one in your sleep
Miss the 1 or 2 big ones and youβre DEAD
Nature of the beast
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―5β‘2