DoomPosting
Why are influencers constantly calling cycle-top? Why are some memecoin community members constantly spreading easily-disprovable morale-destroying lies? β They love the attention, simple as that They know theyβre lying They just donβt care who or whatβ¦
βThere were also those who added to our real perils by inventing fictitious dangers. Some claimed that part of Misenum had collapsed or that another part was on fire. It was untrue, but they could always find somebody to believe them.β
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π2π―1
DoomPosting
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Lefty government trying to quickly dump $6.5 billion in $BTC to attack the right
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π€¬4
Timeline arguing over whether these $6 billion worth of $BTC have already been sold, or will be sold
+ Some saying that they havenβt been, because the coins havenβt moved
+ Others pointing out that in big sales like these, the sale is first done by old fashioned contracts, and then the delivery only happens much later β e.g. just like the FTX $SOL sale
+ Others saying that even if the sale hasnβt happened, itβs already priced in
+ Others pointing out that if the sale hasnβt already happened, then any sale may not be able to happen quickly enough before the incoming administration somehow gets it cancelled = Upward boom when the priced-in sale doesnβt materialize
Looking into it
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
+ Some saying that they havenβt been, because the coins havenβt moved
+ Others pointing out that in big sales like these, the sale is first done by old fashioned contracts, and then the delivery only happens much later β e.g. just like the FTX $SOL sale
+ Others saying that even if the sale hasnβt happened, itβs already priced in
+ Others pointing out that if the sale hasnβt already happened, then any sale may not be able to happen quickly enough before the incoming administration somehow gets it cancelled = Upward boom when the priced-in sale doesnβt materialize
Looking into it
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π«‘3π2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π’4π1π1π1
Unexpectedly terrible things happen, when people treat high-yield investments or insurance β as if itβs a savings account,
= suddenly at the worst possible times, people are incentivized to DESTROY the investment or insurance vehicle,
because they falsely believe that the investment or insurance is destroyed, then they can magically just get back what they previously put in, which they assess to be more than the vehicle would otherwise pay out
β Which ofc does not work out at all, when e.g. the insurance money they paid in during previous years may already be long-gone, paid out to other claimants in past years, or the investment money was already spent on executing the investment plan
β What makes this particularly bad, is, in many cases the disaster couldβve been avoided entirely, if the consumers hadnβt falsely believed that they would be better off financially if the thing was destroyed, e.g. relatively simple mitigations or help earlier on, or at least not trying to actively destroy the thing, often may have easily prevented the financial disaster in the first place
Those insured demanding that they DO get a payout whether or not an insured disaster happens, unless previously mutually agreed, which it wouldnβt be as itβs economically nonsensical
β is a scam β
In the same way that an insurer demanding that they DONβT pay out, no matter if the insured disaster happens or not
Likewise with an investor demanding upside with zero downside risk, or an investee accepting funds but refusing to pay out gains in literally all scenarios
Etc.
Now, this is NOT to say that the insurance/investment companies themselves canβt be bad, they certainly can be and often are
β What this IS to say is that neither side has a total monopoly on destructive scam potential, if left totally unchecked
(You might bring up reinsurers that are ultimately backed by the governmentβ¦ But that only really achieves zero-cost extra safety, without ultimately inflating the dollar, for cases where random chance would make a smaller pool more likely to get wrecked. Not what weβre talking about here.)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
= suddenly at the worst possible times, people are incentivized to DESTROY the investment or insurance vehicle,
because they falsely believe that the investment or insurance is destroyed, then they can magically just get back what they previously put in, which they assess to be more than the vehicle would otherwise pay out
β Which ofc does not work out at all, when e.g. the insurance money they paid in during previous years may already be long-gone, paid out to other claimants in past years, or the investment money was already spent on executing the investment plan
β What makes this particularly bad, is, in many cases the disaster couldβve been avoided entirely, if the consumers hadnβt falsely believed that they would be better off financially if the thing was destroyed, e.g. relatively simple mitigations or help earlier on, or at least not trying to actively destroy the thing, often may have easily prevented the financial disaster in the first place
Those insured demanding that they DO get a payout whether or not an insured disaster happens, unless previously mutually agreed, which it wouldnβt be as itβs economically nonsensical
β is a scam β
In the same way that an insurer demanding that they DONβT pay out, no matter if the insured disaster happens or not
Likewise with an investor demanding upside with zero downside risk, or an investee accepting funds but refusing to pay out gains in literally all scenarios
Etc.
Now, this is NOT to say that the insurance/investment companies themselves canβt be bad, they certainly can be and often are
β What this IS to say is that neither side has a total monopoly on destructive scam potential, if left totally unchecked
(You might bring up reinsurers that are ultimately backed by the governmentβ¦ But that only really achieves zero-cost extra safety, without ultimately inflating the dollar, for cases where random chance would make a smaller pool more likely to get wrecked. Not what weβre talking about here.)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―3π1π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π¨ COUNTLESS reports of mass fire coverage cancellations by insurance companies just WEEKS before the Los Angeles fires
Many stayed behind during the evacuation, to try to protect their homes, because theyβd just lost all fire insurance
Who is ultimately to blame?
Government, as always, despite what the lefty woke Hollywood movies will constantly try to convince you
Also not to say that the Luigi effect doesnβt force the governments to act, as it empirically and undeniably has in other cases
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Many stayed behind during the evacuation, to try to protect their homes, because theyβd just lost all fire insurance
Who is ultimately to blame?
Government, as always, despite what the lefty woke Hollywood movies will constantly try to convince you
Also not to say that the Luigi effect doesnβt force the governments to act, as it empirically and undeniably has in other cases
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π€¬3π―3π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Los Angeles Fire Department is using womenβs handbags to gather water in their fight against the blaze
All the money went to DEI and woke causes. Residents of California are paying the price for Gavin Newsom's policies.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
All the money went to DEI and woke causes. Residents of California are paying the price for Gavin Newsom's policies.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π€¬5π3π1
How it went down:
+ Lefties repeatedly elect lefty government
+ Lefty government creates a highly-predictable disaster, by refusing to do proper forestry management for many years in the name of preventing climate change, defunding fire departments in the name of DEI, refusing to upgrade infrastructure because the more cities collapse the more lefties vote left
+ Insurance companies raise rates in the face of this impending disaster
+ Government makes raising rates, to compensate for the disaster they are creating, illegal
+ Insurers, correctly predicting this highly-predictable massive disaster and not legally being able to raise the rates to balance it out, leave, people lose insurance
+ People refuse to leave their houses, trying to protect them from fire, because they just lost their insurance
100% predictable at every step of the way
Lefties and their government at the root of everything
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
+ Lefties repeatedly elect lefty government
+ Lefty government creates a highly-predictable disaster, by refusing to do proper forestry management for many years in the name of preventing climate change, defunding fire departments in the name of DEI, refusing to upgrade infrastructure because the more cities collapse the more lefties vote left
+ Insurance companies raise rates in the face of this impending disaster
+ Government makes raising rates, to compensate for the disaster they are creating, illegal
+ Insurers, correctly predicting this highly-predictable massive disaster and not legally being able to raise the rates to balance it out, leave, people lose insurance
+ People refuse to leave their houses, trying to protect them from fire, because they just lost their insurance
100% predictable at every step of the way
Lefties and their government at the root of everything
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―7
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Weather channel unknowingly shows DECEASED REMAINS live on air when showing the devastation from the California Palisades fires
Direct result of people refusing to leave their houses to protect their homes from fire, because they just lost their insurance,
because of the lefty governmentβs 100% predictable man-made disaster
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Direct result of people refusing to leave their houses to protect their homes from fire, because they just lost their insurance,
because of the lefty governmentβs 100% predictable man-made disaster
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π¨8π€―4π2π―2π1