Notice how all the past waves had this dip around now,
Before beginning their huge boom
Massive bull run incoming
(2020βs boom was extremely dampened, for obvious reason)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Before beginning their huge boom
Massive bull run incoming
(2020βs boom was extremely dampened, for obvious reason)
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―6π₯3
We have entered the early stage of the late stage of the cycle
Biggest gains coming toward the end of this year
Prepare now
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Biggest gains coming toward the end of this year
Prepare now
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―9π₯4
DoomPosting
We have entered the early stage of the late stage of the cycle Biggest gains coming toward the end of this year Prepare now π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Welcome to the early stage of the late stage of the 4-year cycle
Anyone saying the cycle is ending within a couple months β has either been mislead
Or is trying to mislead you, for some strategic reason
But, at the same time, no time to waste
Drop what youβre doing and get in now
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Anyone saying the cycle is ending within a couple months β has either been mislead
Or is trying to mislead you, for some strategic reason
But, at the same time, no time to waste
Drop what youβre doing and get in now
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π5π―4π2
Why are few willing to admit that the cycle top occurs at nearly an identical time each cycle?
I.e. Nov/Dec later this year?
β Many of the influencers trying to somehow sell you this insight, as if itβs a huge thing
Not exactly a big secret
Nov/Dec 2025 cycle top
Be ready
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
I.e. Nov/Dec later this year?
β Many of the influencers trying to somehow sell you this insight, as if itβs a huge thing
Not exactly a big secret
Nov/Dec 2025 cycle top
Be ready
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
β€βπ₯6π4π―2
DoomPosting
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
American culture is prototypical "guilt culture" = fairness under threat of punishment
while Japanese is prototypical "shame culture" = social honor & threat of social ostracism
i.e. US thinking essentially independent of the question of whether huge boobs are bad, being irrelevant to questions of fairness, and not considering social factors
Japan thinking, though, could directly judge huge boobs negatively, for social reasons, not caring much at all about whatβs fair
So, the Japanese manβs theory that it was socially unacceptable in the past, is in line with the latter values system
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
while Japanese is prototypical "shame culture" = social honor & threat of social ostracism
i.e. US thinking essentially independent of the question of whether huge boobs are bad, being irrelevant to questions of fairness, and not considering social factors
Japan thinking, though, could directly judge huge boobs negatively, for social reasons, not caring much at all about whatβs fair
So, the Japanese manβs theory that it was socially unacceptable in the past, is in line with the latter values system
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―4π3
DoomPosting
Asian manβs research and theorizing on Asian lying: βEuropeans are generally more honest than Asians, despite the fact that honesty and intelligence correlate.β βI ran a BMA a year ago to detect which variables were the most robustly associated with honestyβ¦
See also previous post this is a reply to,
about the asian manβs research and theories about a biological lack of βconscienceβ, in the western sense.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
about the asian manβs research and theories about a biological lack of βconscienceβ, in the western sense.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―4π¨1
$Butthole, cheap $Fartcoin derivative or sufficiently novel?
Letβs consider some others,
$Fartcoin -> $Pisscoin
= Cheap derivative
$Pisscoin was equal or worse to $Fartcoin in essentially all ways.
Superior in no ways.
= Strictly-dominated
$Fartcoin -> $Butthole
= NOT a cheap derivative, despite being in the same theme.
Whereas $Fartcoin had one area where it really excelled = being a maximally funny name to try to force tradfi and MSM to say, without being censored, i.e. exactly one joke.
But $Butthole, unlike $Fartcoin, lends itself to a big range many off-color jokes, not just one.
In fact, youβd struggle to find a coin name that lends itself to a greater range of off-color jokes than $Butthole.
In this way, $Butthole is arguably better in at least one area than $Fartcoin was.
= NOT strictly-dominated
See also the range of pet coins, MEW, Doge, Shiba, Popcat β which are not cheap strictly-inferior clones of each other, and instead rather arguably have at least one arguably superior, or very distinct feature.
I.e.,
As they say in game theory, none of the top coins in a category can be βstrictly-dominatingβ any of the other top coins in the same category.
None can be better at everything than any other of the top ones, or else the strictly-dominated ones get crushed.
See also Dexscreenerβs Moonshot vs Pumpfun β Moonshot is essentially strictly-dominated by Pumpfun, better at absolutely nothing, equal or worse at everything.
Must be arguably better at at least SOMETHING.
Analogies, not copies.
Just say no to strictly-dominated derivative copycat coins.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Letβs consider some others,
$Fartcoin -> $Pisscoin
= Cheap derivative
$Pisscoin was equal or worse to $Fartcoin in essentially all ways.
Superior in no ways.
= Strictly-dominated
$Fartcoin -> $Butthole
= NOT a cheap derivative, despite being in the same theme.
Whereas $Fartcoin had one area where it really excelled = being a maximally funny name to try to force tradfi and MSM to say, without being censored, i.e. exactly one joke.
But $Butthole, unlike $Fartcoin, lends itself to a big range many off-color jokes, not just one.
In fact, youβd struggle to find a coin name that lends itself to a greater range of off-color jokes than $Butthole.
In this way, $Butthole is arguably better in at least one area than $Fartcoin was.
= NOT strictly-dominated
See also the range of pet coins, MEW, Doge, Shiba, Popcat β which are not cheap strictly-inferior clones of each other, and instead rather arguably have at least one arguably superior, or very distinct feature.
I.e.,
As they say in game theory, none of the top coins in a category can be βstrictly-dominatingβ any of the other top coins in the same category.
None can be better at everything than any other of the top ones, or else the strictly-dominated ones get crushed.
See also Dexscreenerβs Moonshot vs Pumpfun β Moonshot is essentially strictly-dominated by Pumpfun, better at absolutely nothing, equal or worse at everything.
Must be arguably better at at least SOMETHING.
Analogies, not copies.
Just say no to strictly-dominated derivative copycat coins.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―5π2π«‘1
Visually,
Red ones = Category leaders = NOT strictly-dominated
β Having some tradeoff that makes it superior in at least one way, versus all the others
Grey ones = Category losers = Strictly-dominated
β Being best at nothing derivative copycats. These you can expect to fade to zero, unless thereβs somewhere that they excell that you missed.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Red ones = Category leaders = NOT strictly-dominated
β Having some tradeoff that makes it superior in at least one way, versus all the others
Grey ones = Category losers = Strictly-dominated
β Being best at nothing derivative copycats. These you can expect to fade to zero, unless thereβs somewhere that they excell that you missed.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―5π3