Tesla was a college dropout
Opposite of the straight-A H1B types
H1B would not have let him in
Real innovators nearly always the dropouts
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Opposite of the straight-A H1B types
H1B would not have let him in
Real innovators nearly always the dropouts
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―7β‘1
Real innovators always heavily working off the clock, outside of work or school
Not just doing what work or school tells them to
Those who are supposedly top experts but never work on their supposed area of expertise outside of school or work?
β Frauds
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Not just doing what work or school tells them to
Those who are supposedly top experts but never work on their supposed area of expertise outside of school or work?
β Frauds
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―6β‘1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€―6π€¬3π―2π2
DoomPosting
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
So far ~exactly following the line drawn the other dayβ¦
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π5
Nikola Tesla on the decline of society into an insect-like matriarchal state where men are ruthlessly killed off
βthe greatest tragedy of all is the present economic condition wherein women strive against menβ
βThis growing tendency of women to overshadow the masculine is a sign of a deteriorating civilizationβ
βOur civilization will sink to a state like that which is found among the bees, ants, and other insects - a state wherein the male is ruthlessly killed off. In this matriarchal empire which will be established, the female rulesβ
βThe tendency of women to push aside man, supplanting the old spirit of cooperation with him in all the affairs of life, is very disappointing to me.β
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
βthe greatest tragedy of all is the present economic condition wherein women strive against menβ
βThis growing tendency of women to overshadow the masculine is a sign of a deteriorating civilizationβ
βOur civilization will sink to a state like that which is found among the bees, ants, and other insects - a state wherein the male is ruthlessly killed off. In this matriarchal empire which will be established, the female rulesβ
βThe tendency of women to push aside man, supplanting the old spirit of cooperation with him in all the affairs of life, is very disappointing to me.β
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―16π€―3π2
DoomPosting
But then why arenβt the masculine countries exactly dominating, especially entrepreneurially? Reason is a second critical dimension = Uncertainty Avoidance, boldness Latin America, East and Central European countries, as well as Japan = High on uncertaintyβ¦
Balls, boldness, not schooling
Itβs in the nature, in the genes no amount of nurture will change it
Replacing the population with a balless population that never innovates for fear of failure, will change it, though
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Itβs in the nature, in the genes no amount of nurture will change it
Replacing the population with a balless population that never innovates for fear of failure, will change it, though
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―7π2π€―1
DoomPosting
Balls, boldness, not schooling Itβs in the nature, in the genes no amount of nurture will change it Replacing the population with a balless population that never innovates for fear of failure, will change it, though π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Part of why India fails so badly in innovation
βIf a legitimate business fails odds are that the founder that took a bank loan will be accused of something else entirely and a bankruptcy will be turned into a criminal proceedingβ
Failure cultures leading to a self-fulfilling prophesy of failure results
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
βIf a legitimate business fails odds are that the founder that took a bank loan will be accused of something else entirely and a bankruptcy will be turned into a criminal proceedingβ
Failure cultures leading to a self-fulfilling prophesy of failure results
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―6π4π€―1
The result of eliminating this LEGAL ALIEN WORKER program and ensuring Americans get these jobs, would do more to boost the American job market and middle class living standards than eliminating every illegal alien in the country.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―8π4π€―1
DoomPosting
Part of why India fails so badly in innovation βIf a legitimate business fails odds are that the founder that took a bank loan will be accused of something else entirely and a bankruptcy will be turned into a criminal proceedingβ Failure cultures leadingβ¦
The American system has been based on trial and error. Which is why foreigners succeed here not at home.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―9π1
Americans are not into equation drills and the constructions middlebrows call "high culture"-like knowledge of Goethe's inspirational.
Well, it so happens that America is currently far, far more creative than these nations of museumgoers and equation solvers. It is also far more tolerant of bottom-up tinkering and undirected trial and error.
United States specializes in the creative aspect of things, the production of concepts and ideas, that is, the scalable part of the products, and, increasingly, by exporting jobs, separate the less scalable components and assign them to those happy to be paid by the hour.
There is more money in designing a shoe than in actually making it: Nike, Dell, and Boeing can get paid for just thinking, organiz-ing, and leveraging their know-how and ideas while subcontracted factories in developing countries do the grunt work and engineers in cultured and mathematical states do the noncreative technical grind.
Elsewhere he describes it as more clearly as risk-taking and having more balls, rather than βcreativeβ, but yes.
US specializing in the more profitable first part.
India preferring to specialize in the less profitable less bold second part.
India vs US culture.
Those whoβve tried to work in or with both places realize it more than anyone.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Well, it so happens that America is currently far, far more creative than these nations of museumgoers and equation solvers. It is also far more tolerant of bottom-up tinkering and undirected trial and error.
United States specializes in the creative aspect of things, the production of concepts and ideas, that is, the scalable part of the products, and, increasingly, by exporting jobs, separate the less scalable components and assign them to those happy to be paid by the hour.
There is more money in designing a shoe than in actually making it: Nike, Dell, and Boeing can get paid for just thinking, organiz-ing, and leveraging their know-how and ideas while subcontracted factories in developing countries do the grunt work and engineers in cultured and mathematical states do the noncreative technical grind.
Elsewhere he describes it as more clearly as risk-taking and having more balls, rather than βcreativeβ, but yes.
US specializing in the more profitable first part.
India preferring to specialize in the less profitable less bold second part.
India vs US culture.
Those whoβve tried to work in or with both places realize it more than anyone.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―10π1
Roughly, yes
More precisely,
Embracing the consequences of power-law distribution of returns, which involves
(1) Judging by EV rather than realized value, EV rather than hit-rate so far
β i.e. Judging value of a bet by βdoes this have elements of a good betβ, rather than just what the realized outcome of the bet is.
Why? Well, this is always how you should judge bets in general, but, this is particularly especially true with 100x bets.
In other much higher hit rate domains, like loans, you CAN often get away with cheating, doing the βwrongβ thing by judging just based on realized hit-rate instead of EV.
Not with these kinds of bets though.
Power-law distribution of returns of these 100x bets means that β the majority of good bets will often end up underwater.
So if you keep switching your investment criteria based on your realized win rate so far, rather than EV β youβll end up missing the big wins.
Cannot judge or make changes based on hit rate, in this high-EV low-hit-rate domain.
Must instead value bets based on:
+ βDoes this have elements of a good betβ
+ βDid this have elemets of a good betβ
= Both largely remaining identical both before and long after the bet is made
Both essentially independent of any particular realized outcome.
Hit-rate vs EV β understand the difference, massive difference, even though in some domains you can get away with wrongly substituting one for the other.
(2) Small & medium sized wins are FAILURES, not wins β Get a 2x return for your VC, youβre essentially a failure, because the few 50x-1000x wins are what saves the whole rest of the VCs portfolio. If you stop at 2x, you've doomed the VCs portfolio. Similar in crypto, achieve a 2x or 3x after a 3-4 years? Congrats, your returns were likely much worse than just holding the majors.
β Power-law distribution of returns, where the majority of bets tend to be underwater, mean that just slightly above water wins are effectively FAILURES too, from the portfolioβs perspective. Only massively high EV wins are wins here.
(3) What βfailureβ as theyβre using here actually usually translates to in US, often involves simply trying multiple things and repeatedly pivoting until you find what works β while each time making sure that each tried thing has high EV, has elements of a good high-EV bet
Good betters here will know that with enough high-EV shots on the goal, if they are properly high-EV, then only a matter of time before you strike it big.
(4) Though, to bet on this 100x bet strategy involving extreme power-law distribution of returns β again it should be plausible that at least a couple of the bets have the potential to 100x or 1000x. Which may not be true everywhere. May not be true in India tech for whatever reasons, which may keep those wishing to employ this betting strategy away from e.g. tech investments in India, if there are simply no unicorns there.
= So, by βfailureβ they really mean βboldnessβ needed to pursue the 100x+ wins, because in this kind of portfolio strategy the small wins are literally losses, and the wins infrequent enough that youβre forced to judge by βelements of a good betβ EV rather than realized hit rate so far.
Mathcels can translate this into the math behind this reasoning, but there you go.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
More precisely,
Embracing the consequences of power-law distribution of returns, which involves
(1) Judging by EV rather than realized value, EV rather than hit-rate so far
β i.e. Judging value of a bet by βdoes this have elements of a good betβ, rather than just what the realized outcome of the bet is.
Why? Well, this is always how you should judge bets in general, but, this is particularly especially true with 100x bets.
In other much higher hit rate domains, like loans, you CAN often get away with cheating, doing the βwrongβ thing by judging just based on realized hit-rate instead of EV.
Not with these kinds of bets though.
Power-law distribution of returns of these 100x bets means that β the majority of good bets will often end up underwater.
So if you keep switching your investment criteria based on your realized win rate so far, rather than EV β youβll end up missing the big wins.
Cannot judge or make changes based on hit rate, in this high-EV low-hit-rate domain.
Must instead value bets based on:
+ βDoes this have elements of a good betβ
+ βDid this have elemets of a good betβ
= Both largely remaining identical both before and long after the bet is made
Both essentially independent of any particular realized outcome.
Hit-rate vs EV β understand the difference, massive difference, even though in some domains you can get away with wrongly substituting one for the other.
(2) Small & medium sized wins are FAILURES, not wins β Get a 2x return for your VC, youβre essentially a failure, because the few 50x-1000x wins are what saves the whole rest of the VCs portfolio. If you stop at 2x, you've doomed the VCs portfolio. Similar in crypto, achieve a 2x or 3x after a 3-4 years? Congrats, your returns were likely much worse than just holding the majors.
β Power-law distribution of returns, where the majority of bets tend to be underwater, mean that just slightly above water wins are effectively FAILURES too, from the portfolioβs perspective. Only massively high EV wins are wins here.
(3) What βfailureβ as theyβre using here actually usually translates to in US, often involves simply trying multiple things and repeatedly pivoting until you find what works β while each time making sure that each tried thing has high EV, has elements of a good high-EV bet
Good betters here will know that with enough high-EV shots on the goal, if they are properly high-EV, then only a matter of time before you strike it big.
(4) Though, to bet on this 100x bet strategy involving extreme power-law distribution of returns β again it should be plausible that at least a couple of the bets have the potential to 100x or 1000x. Which may not be true everywhere. May not be true in India tech for whatever reasons, which may keep those wishing to employ this betting strategy away from e.g. tech investments in India, if there are simply no unicorns there.
= So, by βfailureβ they really mean βboldnessβ needed to pursue the 100x+ wins, because in this kind of portfolio strategy the small wins are literally losses, and the wins infrequent enough that youβre forced to judge by βelements of a good betβ EV rather than realized hit rate so far.
Mathcels can translate this into the math behind this reasoning, but there you go.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―6
Now the Canadian retards barging in before thinking, once again
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π9π₯2