The higher the follower count, of someone who isn’t a celebrity from something other than their account,
— The more likely that the followers are faked
Same rule in general, the more people are judged positively for, or benefiting from some easy-to-fake metric,
— The more likely that ~100% those who score the highest at that metric are all heavily faked
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— The more likely that the followers are faked
Same rule in general, the more people are judged positively for, or benefiting from some easy-to-fake metric,
— The more likely that ~100% those who score the highest at that metric are all heavily faked
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7👏1
Same with so-called super-centenarians,
As you increase the age threshold, for people over some age N,
— The percentage who are frauds quickly rises to 100%.
At the extremes, it’s easy to see why,
E.g. if you look at the collection of people who claim to be 1000 years old, 100% will obviously be fakes.
But, this effect begins to rapidly approach 100% frauds FAR sooner, far before the physical limits.
Yes, people may exist with better than X on some metric, but still you made it so easy to lie, and enough benefits from lying, that 100% of those who come to you for benefits from it will be frauds.
Exact same reason many women say that all of the men they meet on dating profiles are huge letdowns
OF COURSE YOU RETARDED CHICK, YOUR STRATEGY IS ONLY TO GO OUT WITH THE MEN WHO MAKE THE TOP 1% OF RICHNESS OR FAME OR WHATEVER
Adverse selection at its finest
Only select the top tiny percent of those who make the biggest claims about something, and the percent of those that are frauds will approach 100%
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
As you increase the age threshold, for people over some age N,
— The percentage who are frauds quickly rises to 100%.
At the extremes, it’s easy to see why,
E.g. if you look at the collection of people who claim to be 1000 years old, 100% will obviously be fakes.
But, this effect begins to rapidly approach 100% frauds FAR sooner, far before the physical limits.
Yes, people may exist with better than X on some metric, but still you made it so easy to lie, and enough benefits from lying, that 100% of those who come to you for benefits from it will be frauds.
Exact same reason many women say that all of the men they meet on dating profiles are huge letdowns
OF COURSE YOU RETARDED CHICK, YOUR STRATEGY IS ONLY TO GO OUT WITH THE MEN WHO MAKE THE TOP 1% OF RICHNESS OR FAME OR WHATEVER
Adverse selection at its finest
Only select the top tiny percent of those who make the biggest claims about something, and the percent of those that are frauds will approach 100%
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4👌2
Strongest evidence against Sassaman,
— He wasn’t a Windows developer, but Bitcoin was windows-only at first, and coded in a Windows coding style
Which tbh is VERY strong evidence against him being Satoshi
People fake lots of things to preserve their anonymity, but never that, at least back then when an AI couldn’t easily fake it for you like that
In fact, faking being a Windows-only developer would be the opposite of preserving anonymity by blending in, rather would make you stick out — because the vast majority of devs in those early p2p circles were NOT windows-only
Early Bitcoin being windows-only, for sure was among the most bizzare things
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— He wasn’t a Windows developer, but Bitcoin was windows-only at first, and coded in a Windows coding style
Which tbh is VERY strong evidence against him being Satoshi
People fake lots of things to preserve their anonymity, but never that, at least back then when an AI couldn’t easily fake it for you like that
In fact, faking being a Windows-only developer would be the opposite of preserving anonymity by blending in, rather would make you stick out — because the vast majority of devs in those early p2p circles were NOT windows-only
Early Bitcoin being windows-only, for sure was among the most bizzare things
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5