GM almost perfectly symmetrical $SOL price pattern over the past 4 days and slightly speeding up as the pattern progressed because they knew exactly what was coming illuminati confirmed
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐5๐2๐คฃ2๐1
Trump announces his World Liberty Financial (WLFI) crypto play
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐คฌ6๐2๐คฃ1
Messaging-wiseโฆ the messaging isnโt great
โKYC requiredโ plastered everywhere โ something crypto obviously hates
โonboarding new usersโ presented as the primary goal
โ BUT ONBOARDING IS A HORRIBLE DESTRUCTIVE IDEA,
because when you onboard people who refused to onboard sooner,
because crypto wasnโt something they liked,
โ THEN THOSE PEOPLE WILL CHANGE CRYPTO INTO WHAT THEY LIKE, AND IT WONโT BE CRYPTO, BECAUSE WHAT THEY LIKE IS NOT CRYPTO
โOnboarding into cryptoโ i.e. โadoptionโ is a horrible goal,
based on a 100% false premise
โ that willing adoption is neccessary for crypto price to go up,
DEAD WRONG
~100% of market mechanism advancement, like crypto and its market mechanism predecessors over the millenia,
โ has always been forced upon the world unwillingly
Never willing adoption.
and โthis process is perhaps the least appreciated facet of human evolutionโ
As Hayek pointed out at the start of Fatal Conceit
โOnboardingโ people onto a mission, who hate that mission, is a horrible, horrible idea.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
โKYC requiredโ plastered everywhere โ something crypto obviously hates
โonboarding new usersโ presented as the primary goal
โ BUT ONBOARDING IS A HORRIBLE DESTRUCTIVE IDEA,
because when you onboard people who refused to onboard sooner,
because crypto wasnโt something they liked,
โ THEN THOSE PEOPLE WILL CHANGE CRYPTO INTO WHAT THEY LIKE, AND IT WONโT BE CRYPTO, BECAUSE WHAT THEY LIKE IS NOT CRYPTO
โOnboarding into cryptoโ i.e. โadoptionโ is a horrible goal,
based on a 100% false premise
โ that willing adoption is neccessary for crypto price to go up,
DEAD WRONG
~100% of market mechanism advancement, like crypto and its market mechanism predecessors over the millenia,
โ has always been forced upon the world unwillingly
Never willing adoption.
and โthis process is perhaps the least appreciated facet of human evolutionโ
As Hayek pointed out at the start of Fatal Conceit
โOnboardingโ people onto a mission, who hate that mission, is a horrible, horrible idea.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5๐ฅ3
Crypto โonboardingโ for โadoptionโ is evil,
based on a false premise,
leads directly to hijacking.
Bringing people into movements whose values are fundamentally at odds with the movement is a path straight to hickacking destruction.
โOnboarding" is evil.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
based on a false premise,
leads directly to hijacking.
Bringing people into movements whose values are fundamentally at odds with the movement is a path straight to hickacking destruction.
โOnboarding" is evil.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ7
โunwitting, reluctant, even painful adoptionโ
โAdoptionโ of this market mechanism tech is NEVER supposed to happen willingly.
NEVER supposed to happen โdemocraticallyโ
โOnboardingโ misaligned people will only get your movement hijacked and destroyed.
Crypto โOnboardingโ is evil.
Hayek was right.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
โAdoptionโ of this market mechanism tech is NEVER supposed to happen willingly.
NEVER supposed to happen โdemocraticallyโ
โOnboardingโ misaligned people will only get your movement hijacked and destroyed.
Crypto โOnboardingโ is evil.
Hayek was right.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ4
ALL innovation changes the world without democratic consent.
Reject the communistโs โadoptionโ hijacking insanity.
Crypto โonboardingโ and โadoptionโ efforts, nearly always of highly-misaligned people, lead to hijacking, and are evil.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Reject the communistโs โadoptionโ hijacking insanity.
Crypto โonboardingโ and โadoptionโ efforts, nearly always of highly-misaligned people, lead to hijacking, and are evil.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ5
$BTC dropping rather hard, down to the bottom of the accumulation area from a week ago
$SOL dropping less hard, to the top of last weekโs accumulation area, despite having a much smaller market cap, which is weird, because generally youโd expect smaller cap coins to drop harder when thereโs a market-wide drop
And then if you look at the SOL/BTC ratio chart, you see something kinda shocking
โ At the daily level, the ratio SOL/BTC seems to follow shockingly predictable patterns, that a simple momentum-following strategy could ride quite well
So now really wondering how well a simple momentum-following pair trading strategy would outperform holding either of these coins alone here
Why might this apparent opportunity, if real, have already been traded away?
Perhaps because most of the big traders only really care about their USD-denominated gains, which doeds not follow this smooth pattern,
Whereas this pair trading strategy would just focus on maximizing SOL & BTC denominated gains, which may or may not equate to USD denominated gains
= i.e. youโre implicitly going long while using this pair strategy, betting at least one will go up, and perhaps the more sophisticated traders are afraid to do that, usually preferring non-directional market neutral bets
Something to look into for those who are long on cryptos anywayโฆ
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
$SOL dropping less hard, to the top of last weekโs accumulation area, despite having a much smaller market cap, which is weird, because generally youโd expect smaller cap coins to drop harder when thereโs a market-wide drop
And then if you look at the SOL/BTC ratio chart, you see something kinda shocking
โ At the daily level, the ratio SOL/BTC seems to follow shockingly predictable patterns, that a simple momentum-following strategy could ride quite well
So now really wondering how well a simple momentum-following pair trading strategy would outperform holding either of these coins alone here
Why might this apparent opportunity, if real, have already been traded away?
Perhaps because most of the big traders only really care about their USD-denominated gains, which doeds not follow this smooth pattern,
Whereas this pair trading strategy would just focus on maximizing SOL & BTC denominated gains, which may or may not equate to USD denominated gains
= i.e. youโre implicitly going long while using this pair strategy, betting at least one will go up, and perhaps the more sophisticated traders are afraid to do that, usually preferring non-directional market neutral bets
Something to look into for those who are long on cryptos anywayโฆ
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐4๐3
Bull case here, purely based on price signals, which you shouldnโt ever do by itself, but if you did,
Is that the slower the rate of climb, with more accumulation areas, the further it can go up
(Not that quick big rises canโt happen, which they can, but rather that slower rises up might be expected to rise higher)
Bear case here: that you shouldnโt look at that short term pattern, and instead expect a repeat of lower highs and lower lows.
Again looking just at past market data, alone, for predictions is a bad idea, other things can completely overwhelm and overturn these, but thereโs a couple price movement based ideas.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Is that the slower the rate of climb, with more accumulation areas, the further it can go up
(Not that quick big rises canโt happen, which they can, but rather that slower rises up might be expected to rise higher)
Bear case here: that you shouldnโt look at that short term pattern, and instead expect a repeat of lower highs and lower lows.
Again looking just at past market data, alone, for predictions is a bad idea, other things can completely overwhelm and overturn these, but thereโs a couple price movement based ideas.
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐5
Would bet that if we go much below this past accumulation area,
then, short-term, people would panic we have one more flash crash before the golden bull resumes
tbh idk, but would bet that this summarizes what many others are thinking
basically only certain thing, in the short term, is that things are very uncertain in the short term
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
then, short-term, people would panic we have one more flash crash before the golden bull resumes
tbh idk, but would bet that this summarizes what many others are thinking
basically only certain thing, in the short term, is that things are very uncertain in the short term
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐6
Second mass money-printing wave here we come?
Just like the late-70s, early-80s all over again?
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
Just like the late-70s, early-80s all over again?
๐ณ๐พ๐พ๐ผ๐ฟ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ถ
๐ฏ12๐7๐ฅ4๐ซก3