those who get try to censor truthful statements that are about groups and not about individuals,
are exactly the people who judge individuals by their groups, and refuse to judge people individually
telling on themselves
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
are exactly the people who judge individuals by their groups, and refuse to judge people individually
telling on themselves
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4
Grounding Attack
In principle, it is physically possible to perfectly change someone’s sex/gender.
Problem is, that current medical science is nowhere near that, and won’t be any time soon.
This illustrates one of the MOST frequently used manipulation techniques of the left.
What I’d call, the “Grounding Attack”
= Huge body of actually valid reasoning, that in principle would be totally valid, if only a tiny unstated set of base assumptions, which should ground everything else to reality, were true — which in principle they could be, based on the limited information an NPC knows — But in reality those base assumptions are horribly wrong, invalidating everything built upon them
= 99% of what they say is logically right, in principle, if the base assumptions were right, but they’re not, so instead it’s all 99% wrong.
Very effective at fooling NPCs — who just spot check a few pieces of the reasoning, see that they’re all perfectly logically-valid in principle, and then assume the rest must be too, failing to care or realize that the base assumptions are dead wrong, invalidating everything else.
House on a foundation of sand.
Redirecting the NPCs attention toward the well-built house, instead of the disastrous sand foundation.
Same attack can be seen EVERYWHERE on the left:
SAND: Medical science could in principle do gender reassignment extremely well, and even flip back and forth with essentially zero side effects (But in reality not true at all!)
HOUSE: So let’s let kids do gender-reassignment surgery, no problem.
Or,
SAND: All humans have equal innate potential for all tasks, i.e. all nurture no nature
HOUSE: And so we should expect equality of outcome, and if that doesn’t happen then we should force it to happen with forced wealth redistribution and quotas, all the way into communism.
Or
SAND: Good and honest majority assumption. There may be some bad people, but the solution to that is just to add more people into all decision processes, under the assumption that the majority are good
HOUSE: Democracy for everything! Wait, why is everyone immediately voting to redistribute all wealth in the most zero-sum destructive way imaginable? Why everything immediately collapsing?
Grounding attack — Everything logically-correct in principle, except for the tiny world model assumptions at the bottom, which are horribly wrong.
They attack right at that tiny piece at the foundation, grounding the rest of the deductions to reality.
Correct world model is everything.
Ex falso quodlibet
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
In principle, it is physically possible to perfectly change someone’s sex/gender.
Problem is, that current medical science is nowhere near that, and won’t be any time soon.
This illustrates one of the MOST frequently used manipulation techniques of the left.
What I’d call, the “Grounding Attack”
= Huge body of actually valid reasoning, that in principle would be totally valid, if only a tiny unstated set of base assumptions, which should ground everything else to reality, were true — which in principle they could be, based on the limited information an NPC knows — But in reality those base assumptions are horribly wrong, invalidating everything built upon them
= 99% of what they say is logically right, in principle, if the base assumptions were right, but they’re not, so instead it’s all 99% wrong.
Very effective at fooling NPCs — who just spot check a few pieces of the reasoning, see that they’re all perfectly logically-valid in principle, and then assume the rest must be too, failing to care or realize that the base assumptions are dead wrong, invalidating everything else.
House on a foundation of sand.
Redirecting the NPCs attention toward the well-built house, instead of the disastrous sand foundation.
Same attack can be seen EVERYWHERE on the left:
SAND: Medical science could in principle do gender reassignment extremely well, and even flip back and forth with essentially zero side effects (But in reality not true at all!)
HOUSE: So let’s let kids do gender-reassignment surgery, no problem.
Or,
SAND: All humans have equal innate potential for all tasks, i.e. all nurture no nature
HOUSE: And so we should expect equality of outcome, and if that doesn’t happen then we should force it to happen with forced wealth redistribution and quotas, all the way into communism.
Or
SAND: Good and honest majority assumption. There may be some bad people, but the solution to that is just to add more people into all decision processes, under the assumption that the majority are good
HOUSE: Democracy for everything! Wait, why is everyone immediately voting to redistribute all wealth in the most zero-sum destructive way imaginable? Why everything immediately collapsing?
Grounding attack — Everything logically-correct in principle, except for the tiny world model assumptions at the bottom, which are horribly wrong.
They attack right at that tiny piece at the foundation, grounding the rest of the deductions to reality.
Correct world model is everything.
Ex falso quodlibet
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7🔥6
Point here is that often, for the leftist scammers that argue logically, of which there are many,
— 99%+ of their claims may be RIGHT, in isolation, despite the consequences of their arguments being 100% WRONG, and not just wrong in a repairable way, but irreparably wrong
THIS IS THE PART THAT TRICKS THE NPCS
= 99%+ CORRECT reasoning, 100% WRONG conclusions
Symbolically, can visualize it as e.g.:
Claim 1: A is true
Claim 2: if A then B
Claim 3: if B then C
Claim 4: if C then D
Claim 5: if B then E
Claim 6: if A then F
Claim 7: if F then G
Claim 8: if F then H
Claim 9: if F then I
Claim 10: if B then J
Consequent claims: B is true, C is true, D is true, E is true, F is true, G is true, H is true, I is true, J is true
Where claim 1 is wrong and claims 2-10 are correct
= 90% correct, 10% wrong
But, 100% of the derived consequences are wrong, DESPITE 90% of the claims being right — because the claims that were right were all built upon the one that was wrong, leading to all consequent claims being wrong.
Strong house on a foundation of sand.
I.e. YOU ARE WRONG when you say that nearly all of the left’s reasoning, in isolation, is wrong.
And NPCs will rightfully see that you are wrong when you say nearly all of the left’s logical reasoning is wrong, because that’s not true.
Nearly all of it, in isolation, is right — except for some incorrect base world model beliefs which makes all derived consequences wrong.
And of course NPCs fall for this kind of leftist attack — because NPCs are lazy by definition, too lazy to check the base assumptions, just checking a few pieces of the reasoning that indeed are true in principle, in isolation, and then assuming that the rest must be true too.
I.e. Grounding attack, Foundation attack, Strong house on a foundation of sand.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— 99%+ of their claims may be RIGHT, in isolation, despite the consequences of their arguments being 100% WRONG, and not just wrong in a repairable way, but irreparably wrong
THIS IS THE PART THAT TRICKS THE NPCS
= 99%+ CORRECT reasoning, 100% WRONG conclusions
Symbolically, can visualize it as e.g.:
Claim 1: A is true
Claim 2: if A then B
Claim 3: if B then C
Claim 4: if C then D
Claim 5: if B then E
Claim 6: if A then F
Claim 7: if F then G
Claim 8: if F then H
Claim 9: if F then I
Claim 10: if B then J
Consequent claims: B is true, C is true, D is true, E is true, F is true, G is true, H is true, I is true, J is true
Where claim 1 is wrong and claims 2-10 are correct
= 90% correct, 10% wrong
But, 100% of the derived consequences are wrong, DESPITE 90% of the claims being right — because the claims that were right were all built upon the one that was wrong, leading to all consequent claims being wrong.
Strong house on a foundation of sand.
I.e. YOU ARE WRONG when you say that nearly all of the left’s reasoning, in isolation, is wrong.
And NPCs will rightfully see that you are wrong when you say nearly all of the left’s logical reasoning is wrong, because that’s not true.
Nearly all of it, in isolation, is right — except for some incorrect base world model beliefs which makes all derived consequences wrong.
And of course NPCs fall for this kind of leftist attack — because NPCs are lazy by definition, too lazy to check the base assumptions, just checking a few pieces of the reasoning that indeed are true in principle, in isolation, and then assuming that the rest must be true too.
I.e. Grounding attack, Foundation attack, Strong house on a foundation of sand.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏5💯4