Deeper into the darkness we go.

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

While we’re at it,

Would bet that the scientifically-observed white ingroup-hating bias

— is caused by the EXACT SAME underlying predisposition which caused mostly “white” races to disproportionately and voluntarily take on the near-suicide mission of getting on death-trap boats, even when they’re perfectly comfortable at home, a “need to explore”

= Both ingroup-hating and the need to explore both being manifestations of the same underlying behavioral predisposition, manifesting in a variety of ways.

NOT saying that either ingroup nor outgroup bias is universally superior in all situations. Clearly each superior to the other in certain situations.

— Neither strictly dominates, in all environments.

And remember, environment always can change back and forth repeatedly, making previously detrimental predispositions the more adventageous ones again.

= Why it makes sense to maintain at least some biological diversity DISTRIBUTION, not collapse all diversity into a SINGLE best behavior for the current environment

— because never know when the environment might shift back again, and these shifts happpen FAR quicker than genes could adapt on the fly.

= Optimal solution here is not a SINGLE solution, but rather some non-uniform DISTRIBUTION of solutions

Game theoretically, smart move is to NOT try to totally collapse and eliminate all biological diversity, at the population level.

Left pretends to embrace “diversity”, but clearly they lie.

Biological diversity is real, and in certain senses good actually.

So why does the left reject biological diversity, even in cases where it could clearly be shown to be good?

— Because their issue is never the issue.

Their issue is always their communist revolution.

(Not best to judge individuals by their group instead of as individuals, but also right to say that all groups are identical.)

(Not to say that some behavioral groups cannot strictly dominate other groups in certain environments, which also obviously isn’t true.)

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

key element of real jokes is surprise

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

unless your face ugly af, then tbh maybe you do

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Now wondering if there’s a SINGLE example of a man ever using an argument of the form:

“Group X doesn’t have more of certain trait than group Y, because I’m in group X and I don’t have that trait”

Constantly seeing women using it.

Struggling to find a single example of men ever using it.

Most gender-skewed ratios ever.

Any example of a man using it?

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Semi-related,

Yes, it still is perfectly valid English to collectively refer to all of mankind as “man” — despite all of “man” not being men.

Even super-left wikipedia admits surprisingly it.

Commie language manipulators been successfully getting into everyone’s brains.

He who rules the language rules the future.

Never bend.

Never give them an inch.

Or they will use it to hang you.

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Will be genuinely impressed if anyone finds a single concrete example

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

“All men are rapists”

Tripling down on my stance that it’s all projection

= Those who accuse you of believing that ALL individuals in a group has some trait, just because you said that a group as a whole has some trait

— Because that literally is how they think,

and they’re projecting that thinking onto you.

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Eventually you realize it’s all projection

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

“The first-ever police robot made history by arresting a man who attempted to shoot at it and even tried to throw a blanket over it. Despite his efforts, the robot successfully apprehended him.”

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶