Them: “Men and women are equally happy being alone”
Man’s wife gets terminal illness.
Man: “Kill me now too, I can’t bear going on living without her”
Countless identical cases, look up the stats on couple suicides.
Ladies who say men as a group are just as happy being without a partner as women tend to be,
- You are so wrong it’s insane.
Women ARE overwhelmingly more wired to run from romantic relationships, be more content with being single, with relatively rare exception.
You may not like it, but ask yourself,
“is it true?”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Man’s wife gets terminal illness.
Man: “Kill me now too, I can’t bear going on living without her”
Countless identical cases, look up the stats on couple suicides.
Ladies who say men as a group are just as happy being without a partner as women tend to be,
- You are so wrong it’s insane.
Women ARE overwhelmingly more wired to run from romantic relationships, be more content with being single, with relatively rare exception.
You may not like it, but ask yourself,
“is it true?”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7
Precisely,
Huge social or financial pressure — from parents or society or wherever — needed to convince women to keep dating.
Meanwhile,
Huge social or financial pressure — from MTGOW or divorce courts or wherever — needed to convince men NOT to keep dating.
Not all, but overwhelmingly.
Wild to even try to argue that it’s not true of the 2 groups… which countless people try to do anyway.
Women are, overwhelmingly, wired to run.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Huge social or financial pressure — from parents or society or wherever — needed to convince women to keep dating.
Meanwhile,
Huge social or financial pressure — from MTGOW or divorce courts or wherever — needed to convince men NOT to keep dating.
Not all, but overwhelmingly.
Wild to even try to argue that it’s not true of the 2 groups… which countless people try to do anyway.
Women are, overwhelmingly, wired to run.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏4🤮1💯1😐1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Taking a sick day as an adult should be pretty embarrassing for you”
My take:
If there is zero possibility for you to create net-negative value destruction at your job, if you try working when in you’re in bad shape,
Such that it’s sometimes better to stay home rather than destroy something due to your deteriorated state,
Then you’re either horrible at your job, or your job is a fake joke.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
My take:
If there is zero possibility for you to create net-negative value destruction at your job, if you try working when in you’re in bad shape,
Such that it’s sometimes better to stay home rather than destroy something due to your deteriorated state,
Then you’re either horrible at your job, or your job is a fake joke.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯9🖕3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Long march of the left
Eliminating usefulness of all credentials, even the weak ones
Eliminating all standardized testing
Helping to install themselves into all positions of power
Their issue is never the issue.
Their issue is always their communist revolution.
Deeper into the darkness we go.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Eliminating usefulness of all credentials, even the weak ones
Eliminating all standardized testing
Helping to install themselves into all positions of power
Their issue is never the issue.
Their issue is always their communist revolution.
Deeper into the darkness we go.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬6💯4
While we’re at it,
Would bet that the scientifically-observed white ingroup-hating bias
— is caused by the EXACT SAME underlying predisposition which caused mostly “white” races to disproportionately and voluntarily take on the near-suicide mission of getting on death-trap boats, even when they’re perfectly comfortable at home, a “need to explore”
= Both ingroup-hating and the need to explore both being manifestations of the same underlying behavioral predisposition, manifesting in a variety of ways.
NOT saying that either ingroup nor outgroup bias is universally superior in all situations. Clearly each superior to the other in certain situations.
— Neither strictly dominates, in all environments.
And remember, environment always can change back and forth repeatedly, making previously detrimental predispositions the more adventageous ones again.
= Why it makes sense to maintain at least some biological diversity DISTRIBUTION, not collapse all diversity into a SINGLE best behavior for the current environment
— because never know when the environment might shift back again, and these shifts happpen FAR quicker than genes could adapt on the fly.
= Optimal solution here is not a SINGLE solution, but rather some non-uniform DISTRIBUTION of solutions
Game theoretically, smart move is to NOT try to totally collapse and eliminate all biological diversity, at the population level.
Left pretends to embrace “diversity”, but clearly they lie.
Biological diversity is real, and in certain senses good actually.
So why does the left reject biological diversity, even in cases where it could clearly be shown to be good?
— Because their issue is never the issue.
Their issue is always their communist revolution.
(Not best to judge individuals by their group instead of as individuals, but also right to say that all groups are identical.)
(Not to say that some behavioral groups cannot strictly dominate other groups in certain environments, which also obviously isn’t true.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Would bet that the scientifically-observed white ingroup-hating bias
— is caused by the EXACT SAME underlying predisposition which caused mostly “white” races to disproportionately and voluntarily take on the near-suicide mission of getting on death-trap boats, even when they’re perfectly comfortable at home, a “need to explore”
= Both ingroup-hating and the need to explore both being manifestations of the same underlying behavioral predisposition, manifesting in a variety of ways.
NOT saying that either ingroup nor outgroup bias is universally superior in all situations. Clearly each superior to the other in certain situations.
— Neither strictly dominates, in all environments.
And remember, environment always can change back and forth repeatedly, making previously detrimental predispositions the more adventageous ones again.
= Why it makes sense to maintain at least some biological diversity DISTRIBUTION, not collapse all diversity into a SINGLE best behavior for the current environment
— because never know when the environment might shift back again, and these shifts happpen FAR quicker than genes could adapt on the fly.
= Optimal solution here is not a SINGLE solution, but rather some non-uniform DISTRIBUTION of solutions
Game theoretically, smart move is to NOT try to totally collapse and eliminate all biological diversity, at the population level.
Left pretends to embrace “diversity”, but clearly they lie.
Biological diversity is real, and in certain senses good actually.
So why does the left reject biological diversity, even in cases where it could clearly be shown to be good?
— Because their issue is never the issue.
Their issue is always their communist revolution.
(Not best to judge individuals by their group instead of as individuals, but also right to say that all groups are identical.)
(Not to say that some behavioral groups cannot strictly dominate other groups in certain environments, which also obviously isn’t true.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7👀1
DoomPosting
Ever notice that it’s almost 100% always a woman replying like Person B does here, and almost never a man?: Person A: “Group X does more of bad thing Y, and so you can expect more of group X to be punished for it” Person B: “But I am in group X and don’t…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Now wondering if there’s a SINGLE example of a man ever using an argument of the form:
“Group X doesn’t have more of certain trait than group Y, because I’m in group X and I don’t have that trait”
Constantly seeing women using it.
Struggling to find a single example of men ever using it.
Most gender-skewed ratios ever.
Any example of a man using it?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
“Group X doesn’t have more of certain trait than group Y, because I’m in group X and I don’t have that trait”
Constantly seeing women using it.
Struggling to find a single example of men ever using it.
Most gender-skewed ratios ever.
Any example of a man using it?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4🤣3👀3
Semi-related,
Yes, it still is perfectly valid English to collectively refer to all of mankind as “man” — despite all of “man” not being men.
Even super-left wikipedia admits surprisingly it.
Commie language manipulators been successfully getting into everyone’s brains.
He who rules the language rules the future.
Never bend.
Never give them an inch.
Or they will use it to hang you.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Yes, it still is perfectly valid English to collectively refer to all of mankind as “man” — despite all of “man” not being men.
Even super-left wikipedia admits surprisingly it.
Commie language manipulators been successfully getting into everyone’s brains.
He who rules the language rules the future.
Never bend.
Never give them an inch.
Or they will use it to hang you.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯8👀2