Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Springfield homeless advocate: landlords are kicking out locals to replace them with Haitians, paid by the Biden-Harris government. Displaced residents are left homeless while Haitians get vouchers and triple the rent.
👀9
DoomPosting
“The legislation, to be introduced in parliament on Thursday, targets false content that hurts election integrity” Screw your “election integrity”
And check out their scammy equivocation with their use of “integrity” in “election integrity”
People will assume one of the word senses that are good here, 1 or 2, meaning basically honest, legit, elections = good.
But what these commies actually mean is word sense 3, unity, meaning everyone must agree and no one is allowed to challenge = horrible.
Then,
them: “election integrity is good right?” (Ambiguous word sense)
you: “of course” (Thinking word senses 1 or 2)
them: “great, then everyone must agree on the outcome or else they’re bad” (Word sense 3)
— And then they start arresting those who question obviously fraudulent elections, for harming election “integrity” as per word sense 3
THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST EFFECTIVE TYPES OF WORDCEL MANIPULATION
1. Choosing wording that could be either good or bad for the topic at hand, depending on the particular selected word sense
2. Getting you to accept a claim or commitment, while you’re assuming a word sense that’s good for the topic at hand
3. Forcing upon you the bad interpretation using the bad word sense,
And then you’re stuck, BECAUSE ALMOST NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN WHAT JUST HAPPENED
Would bet that fewer than 1 in 10,000 people can even consciously explain the trick that happened here when they see it used.
Whole concept of opposing word senses seems beyond ~100% of people, much like a sub 60 IQ person who can’t comprehend causality.
Why has no one ever explained this trick, ever?
Left’s favorite manipulative wordcel tool
Auto-antonym attacks, beware
People will assume one of the word senses that are good here, 1 or 2, meaning basically honest, legit, elections = good.
But what these commies actually mean is word sense 3, unity, meaning everyone must agree and no one is allowed to challenge = horrible.
Then,
them: “election integrity is good right?” (Ambiguous word sense)
you: “of course” (Thinking word senses 1 or 2)
them: “great, then everyone must agree on the outcome or else they’re bad” (Word sense 3)
— And then they start arresting those who question obviously fraudulent elections, for harming election “integrity” as per word sense 3
THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST EFFECTIVE TYPES OF WORDCEL MANIPULATION
1. Choosing wording that could be either good or bad for the topic at hand, depending on the particular selected word sense
2. Getting you to accept a claim or commitment, while you’re assuming a word sense that’s good for the topic at hand
3. Forcing upon you the bad interpretation using the bad word sense,
And then you’re stuck, BECAUSE ALMOST NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN WHAT JUST HAPPENED
Would bet that fewer than 1 in 10,000 people can even consciously explain the trick that happened here when they see it used.
Whole concept of opposing word senses seems beyond ~100% of people, much like a sub 60 IQ person who can’t comprehend causality.
Why has no one ever explained this trick, ever?
Left’s favorite manipulative wordcel tool
Auto-antonym attacks, beware
💯5👀1