A Japanese man named Hirotaka Saito has gone viral after selling his Ferrari to fund a shelter for abused and traumatized dogs.

The 54-year-old former company executive closed his business to dedicate his life to the Wansfree Canine Rescue Centre in Yaizu, Shizuoka Prefecture. The shelter specializes in caring for dogs that have suffered severe abuse, animals so traumatized that they are often aggressive, fearful, and considered nearly unadoptable by most people.

Saito’s decision was deeply personal. Twelve years ago, after his company collapsed, he fell into deep depression and contemplated suicide. On the brink of leaving the house to end his life, his own dog physically stopped him from going. Saito credits that moment with saving his life.

Inspired by the unconditional love and support he received from his dog during his darkest time, he resolved to repay that debt by helping other dogs in need. Selling his prized Ferrari was his way of turning gratitude into meaningful action.

This heartwarming story beautifully illustrates the profound bond between humans and dogs — and how one man’s act of kindness, born from personal pain, is now giving dozens of abused animals a second chance at life.

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Cooking Eggs With A Carnival Ride

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

‼ Steam has listed a game in which you whip Black slaves to keep them working, called "Plantation Simulator".

It costs $0.83 USD. The developer, FzzyBzzy, describes the content on the Steam page like this:

"In this game, you will be whipping black people to keep your farm productive. If you whip your black person too much, they will die."

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Neet token

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

King Charles' death announced accidentally on British radio

In reality, he's very much alive

Radio Caroline's manager blamed a 'computer error'

The station apologized for any distress caused

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

My portfolio trying to reach a new ATH

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

A dude from Pakistan is seeding a 1975 italian comedy movie wtf is going on even

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass took center stage at a tense mayoral forum, forcefully defending her administration’s response to the historic wildfires

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Chud did nothing wrong

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

“Teachers are more lenient in their marking of girls' schoolwork, according to an international study.

An OECD report on gender in education, across more than 60 countries, found that girls receive higher marks compared with boys of the same ability.”

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

This woman is every single Feminist you have ever met in your entire life. And she can't see it even as her nose is being rubbed in it

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Shorting Hyperliquid

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

DUMP:

$300,000,000,000 wiped out from the US stock market at open.

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY!

TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached).

This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.

All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you.

FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE.

NOT. ONE. WORD.

That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest.

But it gets even BETTER for Dalton.

SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.)

Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever.

I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads:

"... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse."

This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course).

"During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..."

There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance."

"... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket."

Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket."

"Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued."

Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation."

Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation.

This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him.

The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times."

There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table.

Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls."

Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborh cont…]

[🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

UK's decision to lift sanctions on Russia's jet fuel and diesel "came as surprise" — EU Economic Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis

"Now it is not a time to roll back sanctions against Russia because Russia is actually the country benefiting from the war in Iran"

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶