βWe've been ranging for months.β
No.
The hype of people getting super rich on Pumpfun coins has been 95% fake influencer lies.
There HAVE been numerous coins where many regular people have made outrageous returns on,
$boden, $BOME, etc
β But practically none of those that many regular people have gotten rich on so far were pumpfun coins
Those few that had moderate success, $MOTHER, $BILLY, were those who BYOBβed their own massive cabal or fanbase, hardly pumpfun success stories.
And then the more recent ones who brought a large fanbase, and tried to use a pumpfun-like platform to launch, e.g. $BAKED β got predictably absolutely wrecked, in large part by the launching market cap being statically fixed at the same low cap for all projects, and FAR too low for projects who bring their own big backing, and so get predictably instantly drained β same as what happens in tradfi, if IPOs are ever priced too low.
And this doesnβt even really get into why pumpfun had horribly broken incentives, destined to drain crypto as a whole, from the start.
Anyone whoβs not a total scammer or moron has been frequently hating on pumpfun since day 1.
No.
The hype of people getting super rich on Pumpfun coins has been 95% fake influencer lies.
There HAVE been numerous coins where many regular people have made outrageous returns on,
$boden, $BOME, etc
β But practically none of those that many regular people have gotten rich on so far were pumpfun coins
Those few that had moderate success, $MOTHER, $BILLY, were those who BYOBβed their own massive cabal or fanbase, hardly pumpfun success stories.
And then the more recent ones who brought a large fanbase, and tried to use a pumpfun-like platform to launch, e.g. $BAKED β got predictably absolutely wrecked, in large part by the launching market cap being statically fixed at the same low cap for all projects, and FAR too low for projects who bring their own big backing, and so get predictably instantly drained β same as what happens in tradfi, if IPOs are ever priced too low.
And this doesnβt even really get into why pumpfun had horribly broken incentives, destined to drain crypto as a whole, from the start.
Anyone whoβs not a total scammer or moron has been frequently hating on pumpfun since day 1.
π―7π1
Pumpfun so far has collected $88 million in fees, dumped half.
Not to mention the possibly billions(?) that have been drained from retail to scammers via pumpfun over the past months,
due to their poorly structured, poorly incentivized mechanism that heavily incentivizes repeated draining attacks
Not to mention the possibly billions(?) that have been drained from retail to scammers via pumpfun over the past months,
due to their poorly structured, poorly incentivized mechanism that heavily incentivizes repeated draining attacks
π―4π1
IMO no humans should ever be dictating the meaning of words
Instead all real words arising from some simple verifiably true world models / incentives models
All words discovered, none invented
All arising from some innate reality, none the subjective inventions of man
Which would stop dead all these arguments of βBut X said they were thisβ, βBut X actually did that, which Y said means Zβ, etc
β All irrelevant.
Anything anyone says becomes irrelevant.
Anything anyone does that someone says is identified as something is irrelevant.
β Just like as in e.g. βBasic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolutionβ, where the order in which colors are named by societies can be replicated to a shocking degree just starting from a simple model of the distribution of frequency vs sensitivity in the human eye, along with a simple communication efficiency model.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Innateness discovery over social constructs and subjectivity is a FUNDAMENTAL belief of the right β and the more right you are the more places you see it in.
But many of the supposed extreme-right donβt believe in this innate meaning of real words are all.
Successful left psyop.
Extreme right is far less right than they think they are, than they should be.
Real word meanings get their meaning from innate reality, not man, regardless of whether you or anyone is smart enough to understand why or how that is.
So of course, we should do the same for political words as well, probably by inventing an entirely new set of words, all defined as arising from a simple verifiably-true world model, which in turn arise from reality itself.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Discovery not invention.
Real words are real.
Instead all real words arising from some simple verifiably true world models / incentives models
All words discovered, none invented
All arising from some innate reality, none the subjective inventions of man
Which would stop dead all these arguments of βBut X said they were thisβ, βBut X actually did that, which Y said means Zβ, etc
β All irrelevant.
Anything anyone says becomes irrelevant.
Anything anyone does that someone says is identified as something is irrelevant.
β Just like as in e.g. βBasic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolutionβ, where the order in which colors are named by societies can be replicated to a shocking degree just starting from a simple model of the distribution of frequency vs sensitivity in the human eye, along with a simple communication efficiency model.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Innateness discovery over social constructs and subjectivity is a FUNDAMENTAL belief of the right β and the more right you are the more places you see it in.
But many of the supposed extreme-right donβt believe in this innate meaning of real words are all.
Successful left psyop.
Extreme right is far less right than they think they are, than they should be.
Real word meanings get their meaning from innate reality, not man, regardless of whether you or anyone is smart enough to understand why or how that is.
So of course, we should do the same for political words as well, probably by inventing an entirely new set of words, all defined as arising from a simple verifiably-true world model, which in turn arise from reality itself.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Discovery not invention.
Real words are real.
π―7π₯1π1