This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Gov. Tim Walz had his police use paintball guns to shoot Minnesota residents if they broke curfew by being on their porches during covid
😱8🤬2🖕1👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you’re a man,
who at some point used reddit in the past 5 years, was convinced to hate cute tiktok chicks, doing tiktoks in public
then you fell for one of the most rediculous feminine psyops, pushed by fat old reddit chicks and their low-testosterone soy simp armies, of all time.
Seen same as this video happen IRL, in person, at least 10 times over past 3 years.
Save your wordcel wall of text justifications for it.
Never was any real justification for it.
You fell for a fat old lesbians psyop.
What’s worse, you probably fell for countless others, that are even worse, too.
Now, if a woman hating on women for being hotter and younger, yes that is your natural instinct.
But still bad.
Destroy all beauty in the world and the communists win.
Stop falling for internet psyops by fat old political lesbians.
who at some point used reddit in the past 5 years, was convinced to hate cute tiktok chicks, doing tiktoks in public
then you fell for one of the most rediculous feminine psyops, pushed by fat old reddit chicks and their low-testosterone soy simp armies, of all time.
Seen same as this video happen IRL, in person, at least 10 times over past 3 years.
Save your wordcel wall of text justifications for it.
Never was any real justification for it.
You fell for a fat old lesbians psyop.
What’s worse, you probably fell for countless others, that are even worse, too.
Now, if a woman hating on women for being hotter and younger, yes that is your natural instinct.
But still bad.
Destroy all beauty in the world and the communists win.
Stop falling for internet psyops by fat old political lesbians.
💯8🤣3👏2
Neuroticism:
- Women: Sky-high in young women, and drops with age for virtually all women
- Men: Generally low and stable for most of life, distribution widening at older age, some going up, some going down
Women group’s LOWEST is ABOVE men’s HIGHEST.
Neuroticism is the only big-5 trait which shows such a massive gender difference.
MASSIVE effect size.
This trend has been replicated and confirmed countless times.
Ask yourself why you never heard about this until now.
- Women: Sky-high in young women, and drops with age for virtually all women
- Men: Generally low and stable for most of life, distribution widening at older age, some going up, some going down
Women group’s LOWEST is ABOVE men’s HIGHEST.
Neuroticism is the only big-5 trait which shows such a massive gender difference.
MASSIVE effect size.
This trend has been replicated and confirmed countless times.
Ask yourself why you never heard about this until now.
✍5💯5
Young hoes be crazy, in general
BUT what the reddit psyops didn’t tell you is that
— the HOT ones are generally LESS crazy, more stable, less neurotic than the uglier ones
Hot girl / hot jock hate is a feminist commie psyop
Pure female intersexual competition nonsense (guys have no natural beef with attractive guys, it’s a woman thing)
Pure reddit nonsense
Beware the feminine commie psyops
Ask yourself why you never heard of all the studies confirming this before
BUT what the reddit psyops didn’t tell you is that
— the HOT ones are generally LESS crazy, more stable, less neurotic than the uglier ones
Hot girl / hot jock hate is a feminist commie psyop
Pure female intersexual competition nonsense (guys have no natural beef with attractive guys, it’s a woman thing)
Pure reddit nonsense
Beware the feminine commie psyops
Ask yourself why you never heard of all the studies confirming this before
💯7
Women often try to attack and rally others into attacking other women who are attractive, simply because they are attractive
This isn’t even really debated, simply known to be true
What’s not recognized is how often you may be getting tricked into doing the attractiveness hating ugly hoes bidding for them
This isn’t even really debated, simply known to be true
What’s not recognized is how often you may be getting tricked into doing the attractiveness hating ugly hoes bidding for them
💯3
On groups vs individuals —
Ideally, IMO, as much as possible,
(1) Groups should ALWAYS be judged based on groups:
E.g. Never appropriate to justify that the group of firefighters should be 50% women, just because you know some individual woman stronger than most of the group of firefighters.
That’s justifying a group distribution based on an individual, nonsense.
I.e. SHOULD judge group expected outcomes based on groups.
(2) Individuals should ALWAYS be judged as individuals:
E.g. hiring asian and jewish girls for your HR, just because those groups have high averages, but with zero good individual assessment — you’re probably going to end up with the bottom-tier retards of those supposedly high-tier groups, which are actually surprisingly quite terrible.
(3) And when judging groups, the sampling has to be done well — which I won’t even bother to explain here, but manipulating the sampling, often through censoring, is how many of the fake psyops are done.
=
Should judge groups based on groups.
Should not judge groups based on individuals.
Should judge individuals as individuals.
Should not judge individuals as groups.
— Wherever possible, which unfortunately isn’t always, especially if not planned ahead or if good individual assessment is literally made illegal.
Ideally, IMO, as much as possible,
(1) Groups should ALWAYS be judged based on groups:
E.g. Never appropriate to justify that the group of firefighters should be 50% women, just because you know some individual woman stronger than most of the group of firefighters.
That’s justifying a group distribution based on an individual, nonsense.
I.e. SHOULD judge group expected outcomes based on groups.
(2) Individuals should ALWAYS be judged as individuals:
E.g. hiring asian and jewish girls for your HR, just because those groups have high averages, but with zero good individual assessment — you’re probably going to end up with the bottom-tier retards of those supposedly high-tier groups, which are actually surprisingly quite terrible.
(3) And when judging groups, the sampling has to be done well — which I won’t even bother to explain here, but manipulating the sampling, often through censoring, is how many of the fake psyops are done.
=
Should judge groups based on groups.
Should not judge groups based on individuals.
Should judge individuals as individuals.
Should not judge individuals as groups.
— Wherever possible, which unfortunately isn’t always, especially if not planned ahead or if good individual assessment is literally made illegal.
💯7👀1