DoomPosting
8.16K subscribers
91.9K photos
30.1K videos
6 files
92.1K links
Degens Deteriorating
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Car theft caught on surveillance at a gas station in Red Bank, New Jersey. Driver was standing right at the pump. Thief jumped in and took off. This is why you never leave your car running, even for a second

πŸ„³πŸ„ΎπŸ„ΎπŸ„ΌπŸ„ΏπŸ€–πŸ…‚πŸ…ƒπŸ„ΈπŸ„½πŸ„Ά
🌚7😱2
Kraken Exchange: β€œWe are currently being extorted by a criminal group threatening to release videos of our internal systems with client data shown if we do not comply with their demands”

KYC is the original sin, governments force businesses to capture & store toxic data

How many people will have to be kidnaped before gov ends this barbaric practice

End KYC, or it will only get worse

πŸ„³πŸ„ΎπŸ„ΎπŸ„ΌπŸ„ΏπŸ€–πŸ…‚πŸ…ƒπŸ„ΈπŸ„½πŸ„Ά
πŸ’―4😱2πŸ‘1
Whole tl playing retarded on this one

Alright fine, here

It’s a show for women, showing what women love

Women love watching other women, especially hotter women, making humiliating mistakes

Intrasexual competition

Women love watching their competition get humiliated and destroyed

No it’s not about role models for women

It’s about women getting joy out of seeing other women get rekt

Intrasexual competition

If this isn’t immediately obvious to you, without even watching the show, then you don’t know the first thing about the female nature

πŸ„³πŸ„ΎπŸ„ΎπŸ„ΌπŸ„ΏπŸ„ΎπŸ…‚πŸ…ƒπŸ„ΈπŸ„½πŸ„Ά
πŸ’―8😐2🌚1
Forwarded from DoomPosting
Studies: Women sabotaging other women, intentionally making other women uglier

Women tended to recommend cutting the most hair off clients they perceived to be as attractive as themselves. These data suggest that just like mating, intrasexual competition may be assortative with respect to mate value. They also demonstrate that competitive motives can impact female-female interactions even in scenarios which feature no prospective mates, and are nominally unrelated to mate guarding or mating competition.

Study

πŸ„³πŸ„ΎπŸ„ΎπŸ„ΌπŸ„ΏπŸ„ΎπŸ…‚πŸ…ƒπŸ„ΈπŸ„½πŸ„Ά
πŸ’―4⚑2😁1
Adam Back is a larper who humblepretends to not be Satoshi to give off the impression that he might be, when he actually isn't.

Back tries to big note himself extremely hard with "hashcash" which was literally a weekend project - an extremely bad one - and he didn't even know what it was for. Just a toy that someone made over a weekend. Satoshi didn't really have any idea about it and just gave Back a citation to be nice.

Then after Bitcoin got traction, Adam Back tried to essentially rewrite history and spruce up hashcash to make it seem like the precursor to BTC. Which it wasn't. He's constantly humblebragging and trying to fake being humble. He did a revival paper five years later, lol, to rewrite history about hashcash.

In OG Bitcoin socials he is well known as "braggy and obnoxious," only the completely uninitiated would find him compelling or insightful.

Even in his recent clips you can see that he loves implying that he has the skills to make Bitcoin (when in reality he doesn't), he's the same loser as he was before. He's also what I would consider a pseudoscammer, because he only came back after Bitcoin got traction, rewrote his involvement, and then raised money from VCs on that premise. Adam Back is the only guy that I (and others from the OG community) am 100% sure is not Satoshi.

(To be fair to him, it's pretty impressive to have messed around with a "proof of wasted effort" for email spam concept in 1997, based on a concept already created in 1992, see someone found an actual use for an adjacent technology, start publishing larpy papers and websites about it, imply you invented Bitcoin, and raise a bunch of money out of it. Good quality scam.)

Also, hashcash wasn't even the first implementation of proof of work. It just had a name that sounded like a currency, lmao. He never invented the concept, he never popularised it, all he did was spend one weekend making "hashcash" and then having zero use for it. Saying "I invented hashcash" and calling things "an implementation of hashcash" is inherently inaccurate and misleading because hashcash isn't the core concept (which he didn't invent anyway), hashcash is just an implementation of precursor concepts (b-money by Wei Dai for instance is a closer precursor to Bitcoin, although probably created independently).

He's probably enjoying the new wave of attention, but Adam Back is not Satoshi. As for who Satoshi actually is, there's a good candidate (who has already been discussed plenty, most people know the name) but he lives a normal life, has a family, and doesn't have a ton of mainstream publicity, so it's respectful to leave him out of things and not broadcast his identity. He's probably happy that Back loves doing his Satoshi-not-Satoshi victory tours.

πŸ„³πŸ„ΎπŸ„ΎπŸ„ΌπŸ„ΏπŸ€–πŸ…‚πŸ…ƒπŸ„ΈπŸ„½πŸ„Ά
πŸ’―2πŸ‘1
The US AI boom has a hardware problem:

US imports of major electrical equipment rose +4.7% YoY in 2025, to $411 billion.

This equipment, including transformers, switchgear, and batteries, is needed to power the data centers that run AI systems.

Since 2020, imports have risen +$180.8 billion, or +78%.

The surge has been driven by AI companies racing to build data centers as domestic manufacturing cannot keep up with demand.

As a result, ~50% of all US data centers planned for 2026 are expected to be delayed or canceled because this equipment is in shortage.

We need more hardware.

πŸ„³πŸ„ΎπŸ„ΎπŸ„ΌπŸ„ΏπŸ€–πŸ…‚πŸ…ƒπŸ„ΈπŸ„½πŸ„Ά
πŸ‘1
πŸ’―4πŸ‘€2😁1
⚑3πŸ‘€1
HR Directors reviewing resumes from straight white males with no pronouns listed

πŸ„³πŸ„ΎπŸ„ΎπŸ„ΌπŸ„ΏπŸ€–πŸ…‚πŸ…ƒπŸ„ΈπŸ„½πŸ„Ά
πŸ’―6😁4