Trump claims Iran’s new supreme leader ‘NOT ALIVE’
Tells him to ‘SURRENDER’ if he’s alive — NBC
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Tells him to ‘SURRENDER’ if he’s alive — NBC
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😁5
JUST IN: Trump says "Iran wants to make a deal, and I don't want to make it because the terms aren't good enough yet."
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4😐3
Putting young women, the most neurotic and selfish people in society, in charge of raising / teaching young kids they’re not related to
— was a huge mistake
“But women were evolved to be nurturing caretakers!!”
Um, wtf, no?
Opposite
Young women were evolved to be picky selfish assholes, to severely limit which men can reproduce
Optimized for mate filtering not child rearing
Never trust them young lazy selfish hoes
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— was a huge mistake
“But women were evolved to be nurturing caretakers!!”
Um, wtf, no?
Opposite
Young women were evolved to be picky selfish assholes, to severely limit which men can reproduce
Optimized for mate filtering not child rearing
Never trust them young lazy selfish hoes
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯11😡4😢1
Forwarded from DoomPosting
Neuroticism:
- Women: Sky-high in young women, and drops with age for virtually all women
- Men: Generally low and stable for most of life, distribution widening at older age, some going up, some going down
Women group’s LOWEST is ABOVE men’s HIGHEST.
Neuroticism is the only big-5 trait which shows such a massive gender difference.
MASSIVE effect size.
This trend has been replicated and confirmed countless times.
Ask yourself why you never heard about this until now.
- Women: Sky-high in young women, and drops with age for virtually all women
- Men: Generally low and stable for most of life, distribution widening at older age, some going up, some going down
Women group’s LOWEST is ABOVE men’s HIGHEST.
Neuroticism is the only big-5 trait which shows such a massive gender difference.
MASSIVE effect size.
This trend has been replicated and confirmed countless times.
Ask yourself why you never heard about this until now.
💯6
DoomPosting
This is actually insane > be tech guy in australia > adopt cancer riddled rescue dog, months to live > not_going_to_give_you_up.mp4 > pay $3,000 to sequence her tumor DNA > feed it to ChatGPT and AlphaFold > zero background in biology > identify mutated…
Yes there’s a coin
(Will bring the detector bot back online later — stupid codex has context limits and doesn’t auto-compact if you use exec & the mini models? Something strange. Will take a look and fix that in a bit. Rn wrapping up some huge exciting stuff with the rest of the trading pipeline.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
(Will bring the detector bot back online later — stupid codex has context limits and doesn’t auto-compact if you use exec & the mini models? Something strange. Will take a look and fix that in a bit. Rn wrapping up some huge exciting stuff with the rest of the trading pipeline.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥3
New York City has a $7 billion budget hole.
But despite that, socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani just signed a $1.86 billion no bid contract to house people in hotels.
The city won't be checking immigration status, so this "homeless" program will likely be used for illegal aliens.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
But despite that, socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani just signed a $1.86 billion no bid contract to house people in hotels.
The city won't be checking immigration status, so this "homeless" program will likely be used for illegal aliens.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🌚4
POWER CURVE + TIME DEVATION IS ALL YOU NEED
Business cycle models, M2 models, liquidity models, gold models, exponential decay models, quantile models.. they all go smoked in October. Analysts are overfitting. They project their models forward 10 years but have to change them every 6 months. "Most accurate," "best," blah blah blah. A model that needs a major revision twice a year is useless.
This baby here didn't need an update. It's robust. It doesn't over-fit. Simple. Elegant. 8 lines of code.
Import the price data, fit to a power function, measure time deviation, end.
Time deviation is physical. Is 600% over trend a lot? I don't know. Maybe? What was it last cycle? "Years ahead" tells you how long it could be before you see another ATH. Is 5 years ahead of the curve a lot? Yes. You could get a bachelors degree, you could meet a girl and get married, your 13-year-old will graduate high school in 5 years. IF YOU TRUST THE CURVE, then time deviation is all you need. Even if you don't know it, you measure risk against your lifespan. This natural tendency stabilizes the metric. "Years ahead" will remain a fairly constant distribution until the power trendline breaks.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Business cycle models, M2 models, liquidity models, gold models, exponential decay models, quantile models.. they all go smoked in October. Analysts are overfitting. They project their models forward 10 years but have to change them every 6 months. "Most accurate," "best," blah blah blah. A model that needs a major revision twice a year is useless.
This baby here didn't need an update. It's robust. It doesn't over-fit. Simple. Elegant. 8 lines of code.
Import the price data, fit to a power function, measure time deviation, end.
Time deviation is physical. Is 600% over trend a lot? I don't know. Maybe? What was it last cycle? "Years ahead" tells you how long it could be before you see another ATH. Is 5 years ahead of the curve a lot? Yes. You could get a bachelors degree, you could meet a girl and get married, your 13-year-old will graduate high school in 5 years. IF YOU TRUST THE CURVE, then time deviation is all you need. Even if you don't know it, you measure risk against your lifespan. This natural tendency stabilizes the metric. "Years ahead" will remain a fairly constant distribution until the power trendline breaks.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Cubans set fire to the communist party HQ.
Hey Persians … this is how you do it in Tehran. Get moving.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Hey Persians … this is how you do it in Tehran. Get moving.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥16