“Intolerance”, i.e. social ostracizing or stigmatizing.
• Left has far HIGHER inclination to use such social weapons against the right, eschewing direct competition.
• Right has far LOWER inclination to use such social weapons against the left, instead favoring direct competition.
Sound familiar?
It should.
This exactly mirrors one of the most widely confirmed sex differences.
• Women far MORE often prefer using social ostracizing or stigmatizing, instead of direct competition.
• Men far LESS often prefer social ostracizing or stigmatizing, instead of direct competition.
Left is extremely female-coded, right is extremely male-coded.
Problem is, once institutions or whole countries have been built up to be robust enough that, no matter how badly mismanaged they are from then on out, they won’t collapse for a long time — then suddenly the feedback mechanism for direct competition temporarily evaporates.
Suddenly social competition becomes the most powerful means to success, rather than the direct competition of just running the institutions the best.
This is why the right so often builds up robust non-parasitical institutions, and then then left infests them and milks them dry.
This is why the right is losing so horribly in the past 10+ years.
Majority of today’s dominant big tech and similar institutions were established ~20+ years ago, and after ~10 years they became robust and self-running enough that those with a tendency for direct competition who built them became temporarily disposable.
Around ~10 years ago, there was a major switch, with social weapons such as ostracizing or stigmatizing suddenly becoming much more powerful than direct competition.
Now is high time for the right to either switch to seriously employing such social weapons — or else things are about to get much, much worse.
Most important cycle to be aware of. Building up & tearing down, direct competition & social weaponization.
• Left has far HIGHER inclination to use such social weapons against the right, eschewing direct competition.
• Right has far LOWER inclination to use such social weapons against the left, instead favoring direct competition.
Sound familiar?
It should.
This exactly mirrors one of the most widely confirmed sex differences.
• Women far MORE often prefer using social ostracizing or stigmatizing, instead of direct competition.
• Men far LESS often prefer social ostracizing or stigmatizing, instead of direct competition.
Left is extremely female-coded, right is extremely male-coded.
Problem is, once institutions or whole countries have been built up to be robust enough that, no matter how badly mismanaged they are from then on out, they won’t collapse for a long time — then suddenly the feedback mechanism for direct competition temporarily evaporates.
Suddenly social competition becomes the most powerful means to success, rather than the direct competition of just running the institutions the best.
This is why the right so often builds up robust non-parasitical institutions, and then then left infests them and milks them dry.
This is why the right is losing so horribly in the past 10+ years.
Majority of today’s dominant big tech and similar institutions were established ~20+ years ago, and after ~10 years they became robust and self-running enough that those with a tendency for direct competition who built them became temporarily disposable.
Around ~10 years ago, there was a major switch, with social weapons such as ostracizing or stigmatizing suddenly becoming much more powerful than direct competition.
Now is high time for the right to either switch to seriously employing such social weapons — or else things are about to get much, much worse.
Most important cycle to be aware of. Building up & tearing down, direct competition & social weaponization.
💯9🙏1