This man confronts his wife about cheating by meeting her on a tinder date by catfishing her. I've calmed down a lot as I got older, but I don't believe I could remain calm like this
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏4🔥2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This needs immediate attention
American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out
The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients
“There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction.
So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction."
That all changes
“The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing.
They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out
The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients
“There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction.
So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction."
That all changes
“The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing.
They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NOW - Trump says he may be "having some discussions with Maduro and we'll see how that turns out, but they would like to talk."
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
What is happening in crypto?
Over the last 41 days, crypto has erased -$1.1 trillion in market cap, or -$27 billion PER DAY.
Crypto market cap is now ~10% BELOW levels seen during the record -$19 billion liquidation on October 10th.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Over the last 41 days, crypto has erased -$1.1 trillion in market cap, or -$27 billion PER DAY.
Crypto market cap is now ~10% BELOW levels seen during the record -$19 billion liquidation on October 10th.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😭4🔥1
150k of the 900k people living in Charlotte, North Carolina, are foreigners according to city officials
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🌚8
Massive protests against Yunus Govt in Bangladesh. Buses, Govt buildings have been torched by protestors
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😱2👀2
"The fact that psychologists tend to warn against overestimating sex differences but not underestimating them suggests that the motivation is to minimize the differences, rather than just get the estimates right."
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯3👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TRUMP PULLED UP TO MAR-A-LAGO WEDDING LIKE A BOSS
Trump rolled into a wedding party at Mar-a-Lago, dropped some one-liners, and instantly stole the show.
“We need some music! Do you wanna get a bigger table?”, yeah, that happened.
White House Press Sec. Leavitt was there too, just casually hanging out.
Trump shook hands, cracked jokes, and gave the ultimate party upgrade.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Trump rolled into a wedding party at Mar-a-Lago, dropped some one-liners, and instantly stole the show.
“We need some music! Do you wanna get a bigger table?”, yeah, that happened.
White House Press Sec. Leavitt was there too, just casually hanging out.
Trump shook hands, cracked jokes, and gave the ultimate party upgrade.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
❤🔥8🔥2😁1