Robert Kiyosaki thinks $ETH will hit $60,000 by 2026.
Crazy or genius?
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
Crazy or genius?
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π2
I've looked at this a number of ways (not all shown here) and feel I should warn about November
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
My uncle watching crypto crash, realizing he can make fun of me this Christmas
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π―2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING - US Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Joseph Edlow has revealed widespread immigration fraud among nearly half of all Somali immigrants in Minneapolis, involving forged documents, fake marriages, missing employers, and nonexistent businesses profiting off taxpayer-funded incentives
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π―4π₯1
One of the reasons it is unwise to assume that the relationship between variables like household income and kids' IQ is causal is because society is meritocratic
Smart (dull) people tend to move up (down), and they'll transmit ability to their kids regardless of household income
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
Smart (dull) people tend to move up (down), and they'll transmit ability to their kids regardless of household income
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
βPeople on the political left tend to see social groups either as highly vulnerable or as highly invulnerable. People on the right, in contrast, tend to see all groups as somewhere in between: not especially vulnerable or invulnerable.β
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π―4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
$60,000 balance seen on an EBT card
βThe largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. Nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.β
βOne of the ways that people commit food stamp fraud or SNAP fraud is you get a card and it's got a certain amount of value to it, then you sell it for less than the value of what you can buy in terms of food, but you sell it for cash.
It creates incentives for people to, number one, acquire as many cards as possible, number two, to keep as high a balance on these cards as possible.
I've seen cards as much as $20,000, this was on an EBT card.
So how does that happen
β People are just kept on the program for years, and they keep rolling these balances up and whether they're using the card or not. they're supposed to get rid of it and expunge the benefits after 9 months.
But if all you go and do is buy a stick of gum once every 9 months, your balance in your card, even if you're no longer on SNAP, that card is still good.
It's happening across the country. In fact, the largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. No- nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.β
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
βThe largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. Nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.β
βOne of the ways that people commit food stamp fraud or SNAP fraud is you get a card and it's got a certain amount of value to it, then you sell it for less than the value of what you can buy in terms of food, but you sell it for cash.
It creates incentives for people to, number one, acquire as many cards as possible, number two, to keep as high a balance on these cards as possible.
I've seen cards as much as $20,000, this was on an EBT card.
So how does that happen
β People are just kept on the program for years, and they keep rolling these balances up and whether they're using the card or not. they're supposed to get rid of it and expunge the benefits after 9 months.
But if all you go and do is buy a stick of gum once every 9 months, your balance in your card, even if you're no longer on SNAP, that card is still good.
It's happening across the country. In fact, the largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. No- nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.β
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π3π€―2π€¬2π1
BTW, wikipedia literally deleted the valid definition of βnon sequiturβ from their pages,
β And replaced it with just some BS about comedy?
Wtf
Wordcel redefining of all basic words continues
Literally redefining the common phrase for βbad argumentβ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
β And replaced it with just some BS about comedy?
Wtf
Wordcel redefining of all basic words continues
Literally redefining the common phrase for βbad argumentβ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π€¬4π2
DoomPosting
BTW, wikipedia literally deleted the valid definition of βnon sequiturβ from their pages, β And replaced it with just some BS about comedy? Wtf Wordcel redefining of all basic words continues Literally redefining the common phrase for βbad argumentβ π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ
π
πΈπ½πΆ
Buried deep on some other pages, they properly define it, buy thatβs buried and hidden away
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―5
Guess which Supreme Court Justice has wanted to ban rent control nationally for years
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π₯12π―6β‘1
"the evidence sides with the civilians, making this one area where laypeople have a firmer grasp on reality than many alleged experts β and one area where academia seems to impair peopleβs understanding of the world rather than improving it."
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π―2
DoomPosting
Wasted all of yesterday on this horsesh&t Codex constantly lies that it can see images, when really itβs not multi-modal at all, and instead at best does a tool call to crudely convert images and questions about images into text, which works absolutely horriblyβ¦
So yeah like I was saying,
Even the latest AIs shockingly horrible at basic UI-modification tasks
Really really bad
They can make a great first draft, but are horrible at making vision-based modifications
My best guess?
Vision AIs, since the dawn of time, have always been architecturally regularized for:
(1) scale invariance
(2) position invariance
I.e. their architecture was intentionally made such that they literally cannot see difference in size or position, which leads to all kinds of other problems too, like being unable to count objects in an image well, etc
Todayβs UIs unfortunately shockingly bad at many basic real-world vision tasks, while being shockingly great at other vision tasks
Would bet that the above is why
Should be fixable, but seems the big AI companies havenβt even really tried yet
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Even the latest AIs shockingly horrible at basic UI-modification tasks
Really really bad
They can make a great first draft, but are horrible at making vision-based modifications
My best guess?
Vision AIs, since the dawn of time, have always been architecturally regularized for:
(1) scale invariance
(2) position invariance
I.e. their architecture was intentionally made such that they literally cannot see difference in size or position, which leads to all kinds of other problems too, like being unable to count objects in an image well, etc
Todayβs UIs unfortunately shockingly bad at many basic real-world vision tasks, while being shockingly great at other vision tasks
Would bet that the above is why
Should be fixable, but seems the big AI companies havenβt even really tried yet
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―2π1
BREAKING:
PRESIDENT TRUMP SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER REMOVING TARIFFS ON BEEF, COFFEE, AND OTHER GOODS TO LOWER GROCERY COSTS.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
PRESIDENT TRUMP SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER REMOVING TARIFFS ON BEEF, COFFEE, AND OTHER GOODS TO LOWER GROCERY COSTS.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π4
The study being cited here is clear:
Tariffs "lower inflation" by tanking the economy.
Yes, you can lower prices if people no longer have salaries to pay for things with. But let's not do that.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
Tariffs "lower inflation" by tanking the economy.
Yes, you can lower prices if people no longer have salaries to pay for things with. But let's not do that.
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
The sad reality is that most women's "beauty" decisions are trend-driven - without much, or any, serious thought about beauty behind them. For instance, thigh-highs are $5 and few women wear them; tattoos are much more expensive and look terrible, but many women get them anyway
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π―5