Forwarded from Jimmy Dore Show
The mask is off. In a stunning admission, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink boasts of a global business model built on unprecedented access and influence over the highest levels of government—before they even take power.
His words reveal a chilling blueprint: leverage control over the retirement funds of nations (from Mexico to Japan to the UK) to position BlackRock as an indispensable "partner." Then, systematically court political candidates, not as a constituent, but as a global financier securing access and influence regardless of who wins.
Now, as a new co-chairman of the World Economic Forum, Fink’s influence is set to be formalized and amplified. This isn't conspiracy theory; it's a corporate leader openly describing a strategy to shape policy and governance from the top down.
The fusion of mega-finance (BlackRock), globalist governance (WEF), and political pre-selection is the defining threat to national sovereignty and democratic integrity in our time. This is the unelected engine of the "stakeholder capitalism" machine.
It’s not investment. It’s infiltration.
https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1968292764426092740
His words reveal a chilling blueprint: leverage control over the retirement funds of nations (from Mexico to Japan to the UK) to position BlackRock as an indispensable "partner." Then, systematically court political candidates, not as a constituent, but as a global financier securing access and influence regardless of who wins.
Now, as a new co-chairman of the World Economic Forum, Fink’s influence is set to be formalized and amplified. This isn't conspiracy theory; it's a corporate leader openly describing a strategy to shape policy and governance from the top down.
The fusion of mega-finance (BlackRock), globalist governance (WEF), and political pre-selection is the defining threat to national sovereignty and democratic integrity in our time. This is the unelected engine of the "stakeholder capitalism" machine.
It’s not investment. It’s infiltration.
https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1968292764426092740
❤1
Forwarded from The Truth About Vaccines
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"This is my story and I am sticking to it" Says the clown 🤡 woman!
Forwarded from Thomas Massie
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Forbes Breaking News
Thomas Massie Asks FBI Director Kash Patel Point Blank If He's Seen Any CIA Files On Jeffrey Epstein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5lpKp9VI0s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5lpKp9VI0s
Forwarded from Forbes Breaking News
BREAKING: Jim Jordan Claims Schiff 'Leaked Classified Information' To Harm Trump At Patel Hearing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guorU7hf60w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guorU7hf60w
Forwarded from The Truth About Vaccines
JUST IN: Democrats And Republicans Grills Former CDC Director Susan Monarez After RFK Jr. Ousting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS22JVrCPXE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS22JVrCPXE
Understanding Serious Punishments in Islam for Kids
In Islam, there are rules about how to handle really serious bad actions, but these rules are meant to be fair and kind. A long time ago, in some cases, people used a punishment called beheading, but the Quran, which is Islam’s holy book, doesn’t say to do this. Instead, it comes from old stories about what the Prophet Muhammad did.
Here are the main situations where this punishment was used in the past:
1. If someone hurts another person on purpose and takes their life: The family of the person who was hurt could ask for a big punishment, like beheading, but they could also forgive or ask for money to help instead.
2. If someone does dangerous things like stealing or hurting people in a big way: This is called *hirabah*, like being a robber who scares everyone. Beheading was sometimes used to keep people safe.
3. If someone leaves Islam and causes trouble: Some old rules said this could lead to a big punishment, but the Quran doesn’t say this, and many people today don’t agree with it.
These punishments needed super strong proof, like lots of people seeing the bad action or the person saying they did it without being forced. A judge had to decide carefully, and it wasn’t supposed to happen quickly or easily.
The Quran loves kindness and forgiveness. It says it’s better to forgive or find other ways to fix things, like paying money to help the person who was hurt. Today, most people don’t use beheading because they think kindness and fairness are more important, and they follow the Quran’s message of being gentle.
In Islam, there are rules about how to handle really serious bad actions, but these rules are meant to be fair and kind. A long time ago, in some cases, people used a punishment called beheading, but the Quran, which is Islam’s holy book, doesn’t say to do this. Instead, it comes from old stories about what the Prophet Muhammad did.
Here are the main situations where this punishment was used in the past:
1. If someone hurts another person on purpose and takes their life: The family of the person who was hurt could ask for a big punishment, like beheading, but they could also forgive or ask for money to help instead.
2. If someone does dangerous things like stealing or hurting people in a big way: This is called *hirabah*, like being a robber who scares everyone. Beheading was sometimes used to keep people safe.
3. If someone leaves Islam and causes trouble: Some old rules said this could lead to a big punishment, but the Quran doesn’t say this, and many people today don’t agree with it.
These punishments needed super strong proof, like lots of people seeing the bad action or the person saying they did it without being forced. A judge had to decide carefully, and it wasn’t supposed to happen quickly or easily.
The Quran loves kindness and forgiveness. It says it’s better to forgive or find other ways to fix things, like paying money to help the person who was hurt. Today, most people don’t use beheading because they think kindness and fairness are more important, and they follow the Quran’s message of being gentle.
#IranExecutions2025: Surge in Political Dissent Hangings
In Iran, executions for political dissent are carried out by hanging, not beheading, under the Islamic Republic’s strict interpretation of Sharia, often using vague charges like "enmity against God" (moharebeh), "corruption on earth" (efsad-e fel-arz), or "armed rebellion" (baghi). These target protesters, activists, ethnic/religious minorities (e.g., Kurds, Baluch), and those accused of ties to opposition groups or foreign entities (e.g., Israel, PMOI). In 2025, executions have surged, with at least 841 reported by August 28, including political cases, a 75% increase from early 2024. Notable cases include 11 tied to the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests, five Sunni prisoners in April, and others for espionage or dissent. Trials often involve torture, coerced confessions, and no fair process, violating international law and Quranic calls for mercy (e.g., Surah 5:45). Rights groups like the UN and Amnesty condemn this as state intimidation, with at least 50 political prisoners on death row. The Quran doesn’t explicitly support such punishments for dissent, and modern scholars criticize their misuse.
In Iran, executions for political dissent are carried out by hanging, not beheading, under the Islamic Republic’s strict interpretation of Sharia, often using vague charges like "enmity against God" (moharebeh), "corruption on earth" (efsad-e fel-arz), or "armed rebellion" (baghi). These target protesters, activists, ethnic/religious minorities (e.g., Kurds, Baluch), and those accused of ties to opposition groups or foreign entities (e.g., Israel, PMOI). In 2025, executions have surged, with at least 841 reported by August 28, including political cases, a 75% increase from early 2024. Notable cases include 11 tied to the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests, five Sunni prisoners in April, and others for espionage or dissent. Trials often involve torture, coerced confessions, and no fair process, violating international law and Quranic calls for mercy (e.g., Surah 5:45). Rights groups like the UN and Amnesty condemn this as state intimidation, with at least 50 political prisoners on death row. The Quran doesn’t explicitly support such punishments for dissent, and modern scholars criticize their misuse.
#SaudiExecutions2025: Beheadings for Political Dissent Surge
Saudi Arabia uses beheading for executions under a strict Sharia interpretation, often targeting political dissent as "terrorism" via vague laws (e.g., "disrupting public order"). In 2024, a record 345 executions occurred, with ~41% for non-lethal acts like protests or tweets; 2025 has seen 300+ by September, including ~30 political cases. Shia activists (42% of terrorism executions) and journalists face disproportionate targeting. Trials in the Specialized Criminal Court lack fairness, using torture and no legal counsel, violating international law and Quranic mercy (e.g., Surah 5:45). Notable 2025 cases include Turki al-Jasser (journalist, June 14) and multiple Shia protesters. Despite reform pledges, the surge continues, condemned by the UN, HRW, and Amnesty as state repression. At least 50 political prisoners remain on death row.
Saudi Arabia uses beheading for executions under a strict Sharia interpretation, often targeting political dissent as "terrorism" via vague laws (e.g., "disrupting public order"). In 2024, a record 345 executions occurred, with ~41% for non-lethal acts like protests or tweets; 2025 has seen 300+ by September, including ~30 political cases. Shia activists (42% of terrorism executions) and journalists face disproportionate targeting. Trials in the Specialized Criminal Court lack fairness, using torture and no legal counsel, violating international law and Quranic mercy (e.g., Surah 5:45). Notable 2025 cases include Turki al-Jasser (journalist, June 14) and multiple Shia protesters. Despite reform pledges, the surge continues, condemned by the UN, HRW, and Amnesty as state repression. At least 50 political prisoners remain on death row.
#TalibanExecutions2025: Extrajudicial Killings Target Political Dissent
In Afghanistan under Taliban rule since 2021, political dissent—such as criticism, ties to the former government, or activism—is primarily suppressed through extrajudicial killings rather than formal executions. The Taliban’s strict Sharia interpretation allows judicial executions (shooting or beheading) for qisas (murder, Quran 2:178), with 10 public cases since 2021, including 4 on April 11, 2025, in stadiums. However, dissent faces secret killings: UNAMA documented 218 extrajudicial killings of former officials/security forces by mid-2023, with 9 more in early 2024, plus 98 arbitrary arrests and 20 torture cases. A July 2025 “kill list” targets ex-government affiliates. No fair trials; actions violate Quranic mercy (Surah 5:45) and ICCPR. UN, HRW, and Amnesty condemn these as “relentless repression” of journalists, women, and minorities (e.g., Hazara), with 47+ ANSF killed/disappeared post-takeover. Over 400 await execution, and 213 floggings in 2025 target dissent-related “crimes.”
In Afghanistan under Taliban rule since 2021, political dissent—such as criticism, ties to the former government, or activism—is primarily suppressed through extrajudicial killings rather than formal executions. The Taliban’s strict Sharia interpretation allows judicial executions (shooting or beheading) for qisas (murder, Quran 2:178), with 10 public cases since 2021, including 4 on April 11, 2025, in stadiums. However, dissent faces secret killings: UNAMA documented 218 extrajudicial killings of former officials/security forces by mid-2023, with 9 more in early 2024, plus 98 arbitrary arrests and 20 torture cases. A July 2025 “kill list” targets ex-government affiliates. No fair trials; actions violate Quranic mercy (Surah 5:45) and ICCPR. UN, HRW, and Amnesty condemn these as “relentless repression” of journalists, women, and minorities (e.g., Hazara), with 47+ ANSF killed/disappeared post-takeover. Over 400 await execution, and 213 floggings in 2025 target dissent-related “crimes.”
Countries Known to Execute Political Dissidents
The death penalty is used by governments in various countries to suppress political opposition, often through vague charges like "terrorism," "enmity against God" (moharebeh), or "corruption on earth" (efsad-e fel-arz). These executions frequently follow unfair trials, torture-extracted confessions, and lack of due process, violating international human rights standards (e.g., the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which limits capital punishment to "most serious crimes" like intentional killing). Based on reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the UN (up to September 2025), the following countries have documented executions for political dissent in recent years (2023–2025). Note that exact numbers are underreported due to secrecy, and China leads globally but details are classified.
The death penalty is used by governments in various countries to suppress political opposition, often through vague charges like "terrorism," "enmity against God" (moharebeh), or "corruption on earth" (efsad-e fel-arz). These executions frequently follow unfair trials, torture-extracted confessions, and lack of due process, violating international human rights standards (e.g., the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which limits capital punishment to "most serious crimes" like intentional killing). Based on reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the UN (up to September 2025), the following countries have documented executions for political dissent in recent years (2023–2025). Note that exact numbers are underreported due to secrecy, and China leads globally but details are classified.
Democracy as a Billboard on the Bomb 🇺🇸 💲 💣
“Bringing democracy” is mostly a sales pitch.
The U.S. rarely bombs or invades a country just to hand it a Constitution. The real engine is power—military positioning, resources, trade routes, or blocking rivals.
Nice words for ugly work – Freedom and democracy are the moral cover so wars look noble at home and legal abroad.
Regime change ≠ democracy – Toppling a government creates chaos far more often than stable self-rule (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan).
Follow the interests – Oil, strategic bases, and geopolitical advantage drive decisions; democratic ideals are the wrapping paper.
In plain language:
It’s not about spreading democracy. It’s about controlling outcomes—and democracy is the billboard on the bomb.
“Bringing democracy” is mostly a sales pitch.
The U.S. rarely bombs or invades a country just to hand it a Constitution. The real engine is power—military positioning, resources, trade routes, or blocking rivals.
Nice words for ugly work – Freedom and democracy are the moral cover so wars look noble at home and legal abroad.
Regime change ≠ democracy – Toppling a government creates chaos far more often than stable self-rule (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan).
Follow the interests – Oil, strategic bases, and geopolitical advantage drive decisions; democratic ideals are the wrapping paper.
In plain language:
It’s not about spreading democracy. It’s about controlling outcomes—and democracy is the billboard on the bomb.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍3❤1
Forwarded from Libs of TikTok
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ATTENTION NJ VOTERS
Mikie Sherill, the Democrat nominee for NJ Governor, says that she will push an LGBTQ agenda in schools and WILL NOT allow parents to opt out.
She wants schools to groom your children.
BEWARE
https://x.com/i/status/1964062155122086081
Mikie Sherill, the Democrat nominee for NJ Governor, says that she will push an LGBTQ agenda in schools and WILL NOT allow parents to opt out.
She wants schools to groom your children.
BEWARE
https://x.com/i/status/1964062155122086081
😁1