🇱🇹 Lithuanian Neolithic woman artistic facial reconstruction
Source of face:-https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Reconstruction-of-a-Neolithic-woman-buried-together-with-a-fetus-Photo-by-Daumantas_fig4_350537922
👍11❤2🥰1
According to Dr John X.W.P Corcoran
Source:-
@illyrianometer
Urnfield culture may indeed be identified with early celts
It is also classified as proto celtic
Source:-
A Brief History of the Celts
By Peter Berresford Ellis
👍8❤1
The American rapper Nas has the same yDNA as British musician Sting, The Anglo-Saxon Z58 subclade of I1
This was revealed on the celebrity DNA testing show Finding Your Roots
About 35% of African-Americans have European yDNA apparently
Image :-https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nas
👍6
Previously we saw post about Gagauz folks being slavs in contrary to myth that they are turks however we should compare them with bulgarians autosomally
Take this analysis with grain of salt as we are using g25
Thraco-Anatolian means population mix of Thracian and Anatolian roman
@illyrianometer
Take this analysis with grain of salt as we are using g25
Gagauz people tend to have more Thraco- Anatolian roman dna than bulgarians
Thraco-Anatolian means population mix of Thracian and Anatolian roman
Gagauz people are slightly more central asian than bulgarians
Bulgarians are more Slavic than Gagauz people
👍12
DNAmeter
Previously we saw post about Gagauz folks being slavs in contrary to myth that they are turks however we should compare them with bulgarians autosomally Take this analysis with grain of salt as we are using g25 Gagauz people tend to have more Thraco- Anatolian…
Paternal lineage of Gagauz people is dominantly I2A related
It clearly demonstrates their European origins in contrary to turk origins paternally
Source:-http://suyun.info/index.php?LANG=ENG&p=4_17042017_4_1
@illyrianometer
It clearly demonstrates their European origins in contrary to turk origins paternally
Source:-http://suyun.info/index.php?LANG=ENG&p=4_17042017_4_1
👍12🤔1
Austrian people dna breakdown
Conclusion:-
@illyrianometer
62.2% Celtic+Germanic
37.8% Slavic
That Celtic+Germanic input has 60.6% Celtitic and 39.4% germanic.So after doing some basic mathematics we conclude
Conclusion:-
37.6932% celtic
23.8764% germanic
37.8% slavic
They are genetically close to germans of erlagen
👍13❤5
German dna breakdown
91.2% Germanic+Celtic
8.8% Balto slavic
Further deep analysis using mathematics on sample
Link:-https://justpaste.it/e1r3c
Conclusion:-
Guideline used for modeling ⬇️
@illyrianometer
91.2% Germanic+Celtic
8.8% Balto slavic
Further deep analysis using mathematics on sample
Link:-https://justpaste.it/e1r3c
Conclusion:-
56.088% Germanic
35.112% Celtic
8.8% Balto Slavic
Guideline used for modeling ⬇️
Most present-day Germans can be modelled as three-way admixture between SGermany_EIA (54.5 ± 2%), NGermany_Roman (33.8 ± 2.5%) and a third, northeastern European source (here Latvia_BA, 11.7 ± 1.2%) representing further admixture introduced after the initial admixture event, potentially connected to Slavic-speaking populations migrating into eastern Germany during the Middle Ages54 (Supplementary Tables 4.13–14).
Source:-https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01888-7
❤21
Mahadaha skull reconstruction
@illyrianometer
It belonged to mesolithic AASI south asian hunter gatherer population in Uttar Pradesh
The earliest radio carbon date for the site of Mahadaha dates it to around 2010 B. C
😁18👍4😱1
A model of the early ethnocultural division of the Neolithic Farmers of Europe.
@illyrianometer
One interpretation of this model posits that the pre-Indo European languages of Iberia (e.g., Proto-Basque and Iberian) were derived from the Cardial branch, while Etruscan, Rhaetian, and various pre-Indo European languages of the Balkans and Central Europe were derived from the Danubian branch. (I’m not personally persuaded by the notion that Etruscan and Rhaetian belonged to the Danubian branch absent any compelling evidence.)
👍14
Turkey 🇹🇷 dna breakdown revealing their turkic and Byzantine percentage on average using qpAdm
Details:-
@illyrianometer
Details:-
73% Byzantine
27% Turkic
Model:-/g@cxbbot admixtools qpfmc
geno=1240K
target=Turkish.DG
left=Turkey_Marmara_Balikesir_Byzantine.AG,Kazakhstan_Karluk_1.SG
right=Cameroon_ShumLaka_SMA.AG,Georgia_Satsurblia_LateUP.SG,Iran_TepeAbdulHosein_N.SG,Turkey_Central_Pinarbasi_Epipaleolithic.AG,Turkey_Central_Boncuklu_PPN.AG,Turkmenistan_IA.SG,Kazakhstan_Kangju.SG,Kyrgyzstan_TianShan_Saka.SG,Turkey_Marmara_Ilipinar_Byzantine1.AG,Uzbekistan_Bustan_BA.AG,Russia_Andronovo.SG,Kazakhstan_Kipchak1.SG,Kazakhstan_Kimak.SG,Russia_Tagar.SG,Kazakhstan_Sarmatian.SG
👍4❤2🤔2
Turk facial reconstruction
@illyrianometer
Prepared for the 2024 Kurultáj, this is a scientific, skull-based reconstruction of the face and clothing of a young Turkic horseman buried in a kurgan from the Kobdo-Altay region, which was worked on by a whole team of specialists under the professional guidance of anthropologist Andras Biro:
😁12👍5❤1
Incomplete racial world map from a modern genetics paper:
Definitely not 100% accurate, but these maps show the geographic distribution of "inferred ancestry components that are relatively unchanging and common to the ADMIXTURE results" AKA human racial groups in Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and South Asia.
Africans are divided into the following "ancestral components" (races):
- Ethio-Somali (Horn African)
- Niger-Congo (West African)
- Nilo-Saharan (East African)
- Khoisan (South African)
- Pygmy
And West Eurasians / Caucasoids are divided into:
- Europeans
- "Eurasian" (West Asian?)
- Arabian
- Maghrebi (North African)
- South Asians (Indians; technically a mixed-race population with ancestry from Caucasoids and the Australoid native inhabitants of India).
From this study: http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393
Unbelievable that "scientific" race denialism exists when gene experts believe it.
@illyrianometer
Definitely not 100% accurate, but these maps show the geographic distribution of "inferred ancestry components that are relatively unchanging and common to the ADMIXTURE results" AKA human racial groups in Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and South Asia.
Africans are divided into the following "ancestral components" (races):
- Ethio-Somali (Horn African)
- Niger-Congo (West African)
- Nilo-Saharan (East African)
- Khoisan (South African)
- Pygmy
And West Eurasians / Caucasoids are divided into:
- Europeans
- "Eurasian" (West Asian?)
- Arabian
- Maghrebi (North African)
- South Asians (Indians; technically a mixed-race population with ancestry from Caucasoids and the Australoid native inhabitants of India).
From this study: http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393
Unbelievable that "scientific" race denialism exists when gene experts believe it.
👍11❤1
Albanian from Rahovec,Kosovo dna breakdown
Model verified with qpAdm guidelines
They are genetically closer to north Albanians
@illyrianometer
Model verified with qpAdm guidelines
73.4% Native Albanian
26.6% Balto-Slavic
They are genetically closer to north Albanians
😁12👍1🤔1😢1
Presence of slavs in Austria was due to relocation caused by Avars as per this book.
Source:-The Real History of Austria
By Peter Bubendorfer
Dehumanizing source:- Slavic
@illyrianometer
Source:-The Real History of Austria
By Peter Bubendorfer
It seems rational though because austrians do score balto slavic dna
Mr H was also part slavic in this case
It means the people who use NS stuff to dehumanize a particular section of society may fall into question since their leader is also part slavic.
Dehumanizing source:- Slavic
😁8
Croatian guy Renato dna details
Calculator
@illyrianometer
61.6% Balto-Slavic
35.4% Roman Illyrian(Levantine anatolian+Illyrian)
3% Germanic+Celtic
Calculator
👍10