83.2% Volga related
16.8% Balto-Slavic

72.2% Yellow River (Han Chinese like)
🌏 15.4% Northeast Asian (Mongolian like)
🌏 12.4% Jomon (Dark East Eurasian Austroasiatic like)

👨‍🔬 Research paper used:
* https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abh2419

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372574185_Intelligence_Trends_in_Ancient_Rome_The_Rise_and_Fall_of_Roman_Polygenic_Scores#:~:text=We%20analysed%20127%20Ancient%20Roman,today%20(Z=%200.08).

75.5% Proto-Indo-European
19% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
5.6 Western_Hunter_Gatherer

Caucasian iron age=51%
Levantine iron age=49%

49.1% Proto-Indo-European
35.6% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
13.5% Western_Hunter_Gatherer
1.8% Uralic

92.1% Celto-Germanic
5.9% Insular celtic
2% finno ugric

Research used :-https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/dna-study-reveals-fate-of-irish-women-taken-by-vikings-as-slaves-to-iceland-1.3521206

Overall conclusion
55.26% germanic
36.84% celtic
5.9% insular celtic
2% finno ugric

Diversity: Each person has a unique "fingerprint" of oral bacteria species.

Ethnic groups: The diversity of oral bacteria correlates with a person's ethnic group.

Similarities: People from the same ethnic group tend to have similar species of bacteria, especially under the gums

Facial reconstruction of a man from the Globular Amphora culture in Ukraine.

GAC were a non indo european, semi-pastoral EEF people who contributed significantly to modern European autosomal DNA. Their presence in Ukraine was the result of their expansion into a core Indo european territory.Facial reconstruction of a man from the Globular Amphora culture in Ukraine.