Kipchak 1 and 2 samples are available
Kipchak 1 dna qpAdm details
๐73.2% pre turkic Central asian(Avestan proxy)
๐26.8% Proto Turkic(proxy)
Kipchak 2 dna qpAdm details
๐57.9% proto turkic(proxy)
๐42.1% pre turkic central asian(Avestan proxy)
These kipchaks are closer to turkmen and Tubalar(excluding outliers)
๐ฅ15๐3
Which homo sapien skull in south asia was found more robust although having some homo erectus features?
Anonymous Quiz
20%
Sarai nahar rai skull
32%
Damdama skull
18%
Sanauli skull
30%
Orsang skull
๐งฌ Kazakhstani Kangju DNA Breakdown ๐งฌ
โข 36.9% Proto Indo-European ๐น
โข 22.4% Iran Neolithic Farmer ๐พ
โข 18.6% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ๐พ
โข 8.9% Tarim Mummies Ancestry ๐๏ธ
โข 5.8% Western Hunter-Gatherer ๐ฆ
โข 5% East Eurasian ๐
โข 2.3% Onge Negrito aasi proxy๐๏ธ
๐ค Genetic Similarity:
* This Kazakhstani Kangju sample is genetically close to the Pamiris of Rushan ๐๏ธ.
@illyrianometer
โข 36.9% Proto Indo-European ๐น
โข 22.4% Iran Neolithic Farmer ๐พ
โข 18.6% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ๐พ
โข 8.9% Tarim Mummies Ancestry ๐๏ธ
โข 5.8% Western Hunter-Gatherer ๐ฆ
โข 5% East Eurasian ๐
โข 2.3% Onge Negrito aasi proxy๐๏ธ
๐ค Genetic Similarity:
* This Kazakhstani Kangju sample is genetically close to the Pamiris of Rushan ๐๏ธ.
๐11
Reconstruction of a Celtiberian woman.
For her dress we opted for a tunic and skirt in colored linen while the apron is in painted natural linen.
Since the exvoto presents a decorated apron, but, due to its deterioration, this decoration is largely illegible, images of Celtiberian art, coming from fibulae and ceramics, were used. The wolf is taken from an Iberian ceramic, to indicate the cultural and commercial exchange between this population and the Celtiberian one.
@illyrianometer
For her dress we opted for a tunic and skirt in colored linen while the apron is in painted natural linen.
Since the exvoto presents a decorated apron, but, due to its deterioration, this decoration is largely illegible, images of Celtiberian art, coming from fibulae and ceramics, were used. The wolf is taken from an Iberian ceramic, to indicate the cultural and commercial exchange between this population and the Celtiberian one.
โค18๐3
South asian hunter gatherer skulls
Most likely they were successors of Orsang people
Orsang people were "proto South asian hunter gatherer"
@illyrianometer
Most likely they were successors of Orsang people
Orsang people were "proto South asian hunter gatherer"
๐6
Page 29 of research "Mesolithic human remains from the Gangetic Plain:Sarai Nahar Rai by Kenneyh A.R Kennedy,Nancy C. Lovell and Christopher B. Burrow
It says cranial capacity of one of the south asian hunter gatherer was measured 1449.20 cmยณ using Lee-Pearson formula
@illyrianometer
It says cranial capacity of one of the south asian hunter gatherer was measured 1449.20 cmยณ using Lee-Pearson formula
๐3
Qashqai people of iran dna breakdown
Dna๐งฌ details
.62.2% native iranian
.29.8% avestan central asian
.8% proto turk
They are genetically closer to agjabedi folks of Azerbaijan ๐ฆ๐ฟ
@illyrianometer
Dna๐งฌ details
.62.2% native iranian
.29.8% avestan central asian
.8% proto turk
They are genetically closer to agjabedi folks of Azerbaijan ๐ฆ๐ฟ
๐8โค4
Pashto language shares reduplication like south asian languages
Source:- Descriptive Grammar of Pashto and its Dialects
By Anne David
@illyrianometer
Source:- Descriptive Grammar of Pashto and its Dialects
By Anne David
๐9
๐ฎ๐ท Who are pre iranic natives of Iranian plateau?
๐จโ๐ฉโ๐งโ๐ฆ Answer:-Iran Chalcolithic people.The iranics who entered iran were not pure europeans considering fact they were already mix of bmac(native central asian) and andronovo(aryan).Only andronovo was europid autosomally
๐ค So these avestans interacted with iran chalcolithic people to form modern west iranians
๐งฌ Let us discuss their dna
๐จโ๐ฌ According to qpAdm
๐พ They were
๐พ 52.2% Iran Neolithic farmer
๐พ 25.2% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
๐๏ธ 13.7% Caucasus hunter gatherer
๐ช 8.9% Israel hunter gatherer
๐งฌ This chalcolithic iranian sample is genetically closer to modern Lors
@illyrianometer
๐จโ๐ฉโ๐งโ๐ฆ Answer:-Iran Chalcolithic people.The iranics who entered iran were not pure europeans considering fact they were already mix of bmac(native central asian) and andronovo(aryan).Only andronovo was europid autosomally
๐ค So these avestans interacted with iran chalcolithic people to form modern west iranians
๐งฌ Let us discuss their dna
๐จโ๐ฌ According to qpAdm
๐พ They were
๐พ 52.2% Iran Neolithic farmer
๐พ 25.2% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
๐๏ธ 13.7% Caucasus hunter gatherer
๐ช 8.9% Israel hunter gatherer
๐งฌ This chalcolithic iranian sample is genetically closer to modern Lors
๐13๐ฅ3
Wed means to aduct bride
It indicates in past IEs had bride abduction culture
Source:-Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical ...
By Thomas V. Gamkrelidze, Vjaceslav V. Ivanov
@illyrianometer
It indicates in past IEs had bride abduction culture
Source:-Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical ...
By Thomas V. Gamkrelidze, Vjaceslav V. Ivanov
โค14๐ฅฐ2๐1๐ฅ1๐ค1
๐งฌ Slovenian DNA Breakdown ๐งฌ
๐ฎ๐น Verified by research study:
* ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252347/#SM1
๐งฌ Their DNA is
52.4% Balto-Slavic
32.6% Illyrian
7.6% Celtic
5.8% Germanic
1.6% Anatolian Roman
๐ค They are genetically closer to modern Croatians.
@illyrianometer
๐ฎ๐น Verified by research study:
* ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252347/#SM1
๐งฌ Their DNA is
52.4% Balto-Slavic
32.6% Illyrian
7.6% Celtic
5.8% Germanic
1.6% Anatolian Roman
๐ค They are genetically closer to modern Croatians.
๐15โค1
Parallels between the Mahiแนฃฤsuramardinฤซ scene, Mฤmallapuram(Tamil Nadu, 8th century A.D) and a Proto-Elamite seal(Iran,3100-2700 B.C.E).
The battle b/w the south asian goddess Durgฤ and the buffalo demon Mahiแนฃa Asura , here depicted on a Pallava era granite panel shows Durgฤ riding a lion & shooting Mahiแนฃa Asura with bow & arrows, while he wields a club.
This scene parallels that Proto-Elamite seal where a lion kills a bull using a bow and arrows, while the bull fights back with a mace.
@illyrianometer
The battle b/w the south asian goddess Durgฤ and the buffalo demon Mahiแนฃa Asura , here depicted on a Pallava era granite panel shows Durgฤ riding a lion & shooting Mahiแนฃa Asura with bow & arrows, while he wields a club.
This scene parallels that Proto-Elamite seal where a lion kills a bull using a bow and arrows, while the bull fights back with a mace.
๐ฅ8
Tajikistan_Ksirov_Kushan qpAdm breakdown
49.9% BMAC native central asian
31.5% proto aryan
11.0% west iranian
7.6% north east asian proxy
This sample is genetically closer to modern Yaghobis distance wise however genetically we noted it had some west iranian
๐น๐ฏ
@illyrianometer
49.9% BMAC native central asian
31.5% proto aryan
11.0% west iranian
7.6% north east asian proxy
This sample is genetically closer to modern Yaghobis distance wise however genetically we noted it had some west iranian
๐น๐ฏ
๐9โค3
๐งฌ Montenegrin DNA Breakdown ๐งฌ
โฐ๏ธ 51.4% Illyrian paleo balkan
๐พ 42.4% Balto-Slavic
๐๏ธ 6% Anatolian Roman
๐ค They are genetically closer to Serbs.
They are historically slavized illyrians as per source
:-Problems of the Danube Basin
By Carlile Aylmer Macartney
@illyrianometer
โฐ๏ธ 51.4% Illyrian paleo balkan
๐พ 42.4% Balto-Slavic
๐๏ธ 6% Anatolian Roman
๐ค They are genetically closer to Serbs.
They are historically slavized illyrians as per source
:-Problems of the Danube Basin
By Carlile Aylmer Macartney
๐12โค5
Proto indo european pigmentation details
Most samples reveal dark hair,intermediate skin and brown eyes however some samples had brown,light,dark blonde and blonde hair with blue eyes
@illyrianometer
Most samples reveal dark hair,intermediate skin and brown eyes however some samples had brown,light,dark blonde and blonde hair with blue eyes
โค18๐ค3
Albanian being illyrian based on British academic paper published on july 6,1895 page 179
Name:- The Academy, Volume 48
So an article from a british weekly periodical(1869-1915) was commenting on romanians by calling them roumanians and their language as Rouman language
This paper says
"Several peculiarities of Rouman language in which it differs from Italian are seen in comparison with albanian to be illyrisms"
Apart from many languages in balkan they chose albanian for comparison
According to them albanian is basic illyrian language when they were comparing how much roman romanian is.
Next they say
"They indicate the imperfect character of the Romanisation of the speakers."
May be constructive criticism they did about this but while comparison they noted romanian has base similar to albanian despite how much romanization happened.It demonstrates illyrian aspect of albanian language
@illyrianometer
Name:- The Academy, Volume 48
So an article from a british weekly periodical(1869-1915) was commenting on romanians by calling them roumanians and their language as Rouman language
This paper says
"Several peculiarities of Rouman language in which it differs from Italian are seen in comparison with albanian to be illyrisms"
Apart from many languages in balkan they chose albanian for comparison
According to them albanian is basic illyrian language when they were comparing how much roman romanian is.
Next they say
"They indicate the imperfect character of the Romanisation of the speakers."
May be constructive criticism they did about this but while comparison they noted romanian has base similar to albanian despite how much romanization happened.It demonstrates illyrian aspect of albanian language
๐10๐ฅ4
Portugal Miroico Late Roman Maghrebi-Native European dna breakdown as per qpAdm
79.1% native European
20.9% Maghrebi
They are genetically closer to Portuguese
It means modern Portuguese are also part North african
This North african dna is older than islamic expansion
@illyrianometer
79.1% native European
20.9% Maghrebi
They are genetically closer to Portuguese
It means modern Portuguese are also part North african
This North african dna is older than islamic expansion
๐ค11๐6๐ฅ2โค1๐1๐ข1