49.3% Roman Illyrian
50.7% Balto-Slavic

The man had a fibrous nasalis. He lost his upper teeth and died quite early, probably from a bacterial infection. If antibiotics had existed at that time, many people would have lived healthier lives and survived simple diseases.

1.Northern Albanians show increment in slavic dna
2.Southern Albanians have high Thraco Illyrian Roman dna.

81.6% Thraco Illyrian Roman
18.4% Balto-Slavic

Note:-
1.Almost all bosnians are high slavic
2.Unlike serbians,Bosnians are more slavic

60.5% Slavic
39.5% Illyrian Roman

A chestnut woman attends a soldier in the Plaza del Sol, Madrid, year 1807 AD. (Augusto Ferrer-Dalmau).

Etruscan Civilization (Italy, 900-27 BCE)
A Young Woman (Late 4th–early 3rd c. BCE)
Terracotta statuette, 74.8 cm. high

It seems some moldovans are pretty high slavic and some are less slavic

43.1% Celtic dna
56.9% Bell Beaker

1.Insular Celtic represents natives of Britain who lived before Germanic related people invaded
2.Insular Celts aren't pure Celts rather mixture of bell beaker and Celtic

Celtic meme of the day

59.8% Iranic-Turko Saka
30.4% Mongolian
9.8% Gandhara Indic South Asian

Iranic-Turko Saka means those central asians who got mixture from proto turks,indigenous central asians and aryans.Since real turks originated in central asia and had overlap with iranics genetically

Mongolian dna represents mongolian raider dna.

Gandhara Indic South Asian dna refers to dna which central asians got by interacting with native gandhara dardic people of Afghanistan.South asian dna existed from past in Uzbekistan

Notes:-
1.Some bulgarians are highly slavic
2.Some bulgarians are highly native thraco roman related
3.Bulgarians have small east eurasian input from Turkic source

Franzhausen, Austria: Early Bronze Age Grave 110 with bronze objects and reconstruction. Model: Susanne Mayrhofer.

1.Romanians have high Balto-Slavic dna
2.Romanians have Thraco dacian dna which is native one however it is lesser than their balto slavic component
3.Romanians have Levanto Anatolian dna which demonstrates fact they mixed with romans
4.Romanians are not gypsies this claim has no genetic evidence

1.Some Montenegrins can be highly slavic
2.Some Montenegrins can be highly roman illyrian.
3.History suggests there was slavization of Montenegrins

One interesting thing this research paper claim is that mesolithic europeans (including western european mesolithics) had already gone through selective sweeps for lighter skin aka they already had selection for lighter skin before arrival of farmers and steppe related folks

Which I guess makes sense if you think about it, since their environment was dark and cold with not that much sunlight

It doesn't claim they were as light-skinned as modern europeans, just that they were significantly lighter than africans and so forth which I guess makes sense if you think about it, since their environment was dark and cold with not that much sunlight

It doesn't claim they were as light-skinned as modern europeans, just that they were significantly lighter than africans and so forth