I am still frustrated that I can’t find time to finish the video I recorded last week.

Is the Britisher literally the lol-cow everyone thinks Sargon is?

Some people don't understand why Right-Wingers are so pedantic. This is the reason why. There are still people out there who believe in fantasies, and they will lead men's souls to ruin because of it. If I can save the soul of even a single man with my work, I'll consider my channel and everything I've ever done well worth it.

It never ceases to amaze me just how much of modern progressivism is an attempt to construct moral righteousness out of self-referential linguistic loops.

The global brain we call the Cathedral changed its mind last month. It went from "LabLeak:False" to "LabLeak:Maybe". This is technically a success, but we need to understand that  political problems arise for the Cathedral the second it makes the next transition from "LabLeak:Maybe" to "LabLeak:True". If this is done, anywhere in the proximity of 2020, SO MANY progressive memes are instantly vaporized.

For instance, if this Wuhan-Lab theory is validated, I never want to hear secular progressives moan about the trial of Galileo ever again.
"Hey remember that time, 400 years ago, when the Catholic Church used political force to uphold a false consensus and sent a dissident scientist to indefinite house arrest?"
"Hey remember that time, 4 months ago, when secular scientific community used political force to uphold a false consensus and sent all 300 million of us into indefinite house arrest?"
Meme dead.

For this reason, I am willing to bet that, no matter the evidence, the mainstream will NOT embrace the LabLeak theory of COVID as definitely "True". Expect years of "it's only a theory!" to persist until some other crisis (hopefully involving China) wipes everyone's memories and the mainstream can rewrite the narrative to be about the evil CCP tricking the  Western medical establishment like Goldstein in 1984.

The right is only ever allowed to “be right” about historical questions, never active political scientific matters. If they happen to be right about an active political matter, the conclusion will get sat on until it becomes historic.

Georgism intensifies.

Already normie-cons we need some ground rules going forward. Being anti-anti-white is not being a “white supremecist”. https://youtu.be/Yh0EMfjhqzM

If an HR presentation telling employees to “be less white” isn’t “anti-white” then NOTHING is “anti-white”.

I thought BreadTube couldn’t get more irritating but now it appears Thought Slimes new gig is making fun of people who are WAAY smarter than him for the entertainment of his largely midwit audience. Remember kids if the idea wasn’t covered in first-year intersectionality class that means it’s for STUPID people! https://youtu.be/wUkHSPdudn4

That being said Yusokowsky is genuinely a funny character. A genius but also the most autistic mind that God saw fit to create.

That being said do I have problems with his research? Not really. Most of it is just autists describing the problems of autistic AI trying to solve autistic problems. Hence Roko’s Bassilisk which might be called “how autism can destroy the world”. Spoiler alert the main thing you can learn from these autistic thinkers is that we should NEVER create infinitely powerful autistic robot rulers.

Bad mood today. Perhaps this is a bad time to mention that, just going off my stereotypes of communities in 2017, nothing has really changed.

1. Sargonite post-liberal-liberals: well meaning scoffers, brains stuck in the 1990s, good lads but insufferably oblivious .

2. Alt-Righters circa 2015: contemplative moaners in love with a world that no longer exists, old souls set to a melancholia, bitter but poetic.

3. Alter-Righters circa 2017: 4-chan bros that have graduated from meme-ing to callous stupidity, over-confidence, and unserious disconnected activism.

4. MGTOW: A self-pitying bunch whose ultimately noble goal of "going their own way" is readily abandoned the second they can leave bitter comments in other people's comment sections.

5. The Trad Cath Crowd: Well meaning goobers who can't get out of their own way, addicted to a fantasy cultural compromise represented in 1990s evangelical protestantism or John-Paul-II Catholicism that could have (but notably didn't) materialize. 

6. Libertarian Anarcho-Capitalists: Turbo autists trying to beat political theory with that one cool trick. Reality was left out of their equations because it made the math messy.

7. Progressive LGBT Influencers: Mercenary hedonists whose pretention to pure epicurean sensualism is eclipsed by their own narcissistic obsession with accumulating clout.

8. Atheist Nihilist Types: small-souled bugmen who use aggression against traditional beliefs and personal self-deprecation to cover up the fact that they are the objectively the least interesting people on the internet.

9. Progressive  Breadtube Streamers: Bitter nerds bullied in HS, now given a cathartic opportunity to bully dissidents against the status quo. Their obliviousness to their own stunted psychology is only matched by their total disinterest in actual ideas about politics.

10. NRX right wingers: wanky autistic nerds, somewhat more pragmatically focused than their libertarian counterparts, endlessly describing the physics of the knives tearing apart their body with no solution on how to make it stop.

11. Progressive Classic Marxist Types: Textbook philosophy pedants whose major failing in life is that they study ideas yet have no new ideas themselves. Will never stray from approved concepts they learned as undergrads, but boy will they nail you if they think you didn't read Das Captial vol 3 closely enough. 

And I am not judging. My entire brand is just cutting 5.) with 10.) and hoping that the defects balance out. I don't know. It's really time for something new.

https://t.me/MorgothsReview/1172

Andrew Sullivan is a man who, while claiming to be a faithful Catholic and a conservative, made a career of disparaging social conservatives and advocating for “gay marriage.” He has not once, to my knowledge, regretted his position.

This letter got out of hand. WAAAY too long, and yes, there will be a video recording this week. https://fiddlersgreene.substack.com/p/on-folk-culture-and-the-extended

Can anyone make sense of this Car-crash blog post? It’s insane reaction after insane reaction piling on top of each other until nothing makes sense. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/the-coming-race-crack-up-critical-race-theory/

This but unironically

The Crowder vs. Ethan Klein / Sam Sedar debacle is instructive about the absolute state of online discourse as demanded by the people who watch YouTube. The unspoken rules about what people want and who “wins” debates. Crowder ran from a fight after his first interlocutor hid behind a pinch hitter. Because of that he “loses” but really if he had done anything else (including just insulting his guest) he would have “won”.

What bullshit is this? Everyone who does YT has people they don’t want to talk to. For example if the same thing happened to me with a debate crashed by a troll (let’s call him “el presidente”), the most rational thing would be to hang up and save everyone’s time since I have nothing to say to that person. But that would be “losing”. Instead however, I could just drop the debate subject and verbally abuse “el presidente” until he left thus “winning” but not advancing the dialectic.

Therefore by YT standards “boundaries + agree to disagree” = losing, “time wasting drama with no point” = winning.