I appreciate the message, but most Reverend Bishop Barron needs to understand what weak tea this is. The church needs to have a full reckoning with an explanation of how things need to be different. Religious identity and practice can’t be “shut off” when the authorities want it to go away. https://youtu.be/Ppdosk38EAU

I am still convinced the best reaction to anti-whiteness is to mark it intellectually, document it (save to archive), and then react with as LITTLE EMOTION AS POSSIBLE. Change my mind.

As I've noted before when you drill down into the anti-white dogma they're rejecting western civilization in its entirety because, after all, it too is a construction of ''whiteness''.
And so ''free speech'' is whiteness.
Democracy is whiteness
A fair trial is whiteness
Not butchering people on the streets with machetes is whiteness
Privacy is whiteness
Age of consent is whiteness

The logical conclusion to this is an academic who wants to shoot white people in the head and feel the blood dripping from her fingers knowing that all constraints to prevent her thinking this way are a creation of whiteness, and therefore to be resented.

https://t.me/redicetv/1268

As per usual. Essay is delayed. Someone recommended that I get the wife to proof read. While I am sure this will cut the typos, it also really slows down getting the thing out

There needs to be a bell-curve meme concerning the juvenile insult “fake and gay”, each of the three bell curve locations can be occupied by myself in my early teens, early twenties, and early thirties respectively.

Why can’t we have nice leftists like Angela Nagle anymore? https://youtu.be/d2bBSajVvUU

Out of the last ten months I've had a Twitter account for two weeks. Somebody asked me what I thought of the ''Radfems'' and my answer was that I had no opinion because I wasn't on Twitter but knew via AA's recent shit storm of a stream it's people forming a branch of drama on Twitter that will be forgotten about in a few weeks.

Twitter creates factions by incentivizing its users to amplify minor disputes for social approval, this naturally leads to full breaks in digital ''communities'' which only occur on social media.

Somebody somewhere will be running the numbers on this, your hot new clique will appear as nodes coalescing and breaking apart, reforming and then fracturing again, you think it's discourse, the computer knows its just algorithmically led behaviour.

The number crunchers will also be aware of how often this occurs, how long these globules of social media movements last and where the next ones are forming.

Not being on Twitter means that there are hundreds of arguments, posts, owns and counter owns that I've never been involved with or spent time on, but even if they had of happened nothing whatsoever would have changed, either for the better or worse.

This channel is an absolute treasure trove of interesting books to read. Instead of uploading videos he's created a library.

https://odysee.com/@MemoryoftheWorld:f6

Starting a new job, moving, and remodeling the house. These weeks are going to be light in content. Probably for a while. I am working on getting something out though.

I am still frustrated that I can’t find time to finish the video I recorded last week.

Is the Britisher literally the lol-cow everyone thinks Sargon is?

Some people don't understand why Right-Wingers are so pedantic. This is the reason why. There are still people out there who believe in fantasies, and they will lead men's souls to ruin because of it. If I can save the soul of even a single man with my work, I'll consider my channel and everything I've ever done well worth it.

It never ceases to amaze me just how much of modern progressivism is an attempt to construct moral righteousness out of self-referential linguistic loops.

The global brain we call the Cathedral changed its mind last month. It went from "LabLeak:False" to "LabLeak:Maybe". This is technically a success, but we need to understand that  political problems arise for the Cathedral the second it makes the next transition from "LabLeak:Maybe" to "LabLeak:True". If this is done, anywhere in the proximity of 2020, SO MANY progressive memes are instantly vaporized.

For instance, if this Wuhan-Lab theory is validated, I never want to hear secular progressives moan about the trial of Galileo ever again.
"Hey remember that time, 400 years ago, when the Catholic Church used political force to uphold a false consensus and sent a dissident scientist to indefinite house arrest?"
"Hey remember that time, 4 months ago, when secular scientific community used political force to uphold a false consensus and sent all 300 million of us into indefinite house arrest?"
Meme dead.

For this reason, I am willing to bet that, no matter the evidence, the mainstream will NOT embrace the LabLeak theory of COVID as definitely "True". Expect years of "it's only a theory!" to persist until some other crisis (hopefully involving China) wipes everyone's memories and the mainstream can rewrite the narrative to be about the evil CCP tricking the  Western medical establishment like Goldstein in 1984.

The right is only ever allowed to “be right” about historical questions, never active political scientific matters. If they happen to be right about an active political matter, the conclusion will get sat on until it becomes historic.