Join me tonight for my weekly Tuesday sunset stream. https://youtu.be/0qnkqvawJcY

Can pagans replying to my article do me a favor? Please respond to my arguments. Don’t just copy-pasta the original statement of your claims and pretend you didn’t hear my responses. Better yet respond to the questions I brought to pagans IN that article.

What is a non-universalist religion? Does truth have a zip code?

Going live in an hour. https://youtu.be/0qnkqvawJcY

Lol

I challenge the @Distributist to a boxing match over the question of civic nationalism.

If I win, he has to admit that race is an essential part of identity.

If he wins, I have to buy him grape drank, watermelon and a KFC, and join him rampaging through downtown Detroit and hunting for side bitches.

If he rejects this challenge, then I win by default - and he can kiss goodbye to his credibility!

Most of my conflict with the nationalist types owes to the fact that they only recognize three potential positions on race.

1. Vicious anti-white leftist vitriol
2. Boneheaded oblivious conservative “color-blindness”
3. Obsessive political focus on race as the “ne plus ultra” of political considerations above and before all other questions

Are these the only three options when it comes to thinking about race? They are in the political frame of 2022. But these weren’t the only options in 1922 or 1822 or 1722, which gives you a hint.

This is the enemies frame.

I refuse to participate in a conversation about race that doesn’t allow for subtlety outside the limited imagination of the present.

It looks like, due to increased rates, I am going to have to look for a free service to host a bunch of my old essays. Anyone have any suggestions about blogging or hosting platforms that are free? I would like all my stuff to be in one place.

Sargon is right about this, but the problem goes so deep it would require a radical restructuring of society to solve this. https://youtu.be/37FGPceqySo

Inside every Mr. Potatoe-head there is a lesson: what starts as the fun bending of boundaries inevitably descends into Landian Body-Horror.

I can’t be the only right-winger to find ContraPoints once-a-year video enlightening, even if it is objectively shit content.

In this episode Natalie takes on the problem of closeted Evangelical anti-gay conservative Christians who (apparently) totally dominate our culture and silence all “queer voices”. Later, the author implies that these bad actors are the reason they elected to use opiates and become addicted. You see, the drugs are just to battle the “pain” endemic in a career which involves getting paid 7-figures to produce one 50-minute video a year and being universally praised by the mainstream media.

What’s so apparent here is not just the self-indulgence but the staleness of the narrative. ContraPoints got popular because the puppet-shows they put on somewhat represented a kind of conversation going on in 2017. But who is the antagonist in this most recent video supposed to represent? Michelle Bachman? And when, in 2022, are there mainstream debates between trans celebrities and Evangelicals where the later threatens the former with Hellfire?

We aren’t going forward to 2022 but backwards to the New Atheist movement of 2008, in turn, reflecting their own mythology about a conversation that (might) have taken place sometime in the 1980s. This narrative can only exist in the past. The only fresh story is the one of elective self-destruction and deeper spiritual crisis.

https://youtu.be/RTRT794IQBg

BTW, best video ever on ContraPoints. Best video of 2021 in fact. https://youtu.be/dFco_IFeOE4

I'm on Auron's channel in just under 20 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC2KPf3Ul-E

Centrist YouTube is outraged because the repulsive (((Ethan Klein))) called on his subs to bomb the NRA and use guns to harass politicians live on YouTube, his channel is still up though the video was taken down.

The Quartering is correct of course that YouTube's double-standards are appalling and obvious. But despite the title of this video he says he does not actually want Ethan Klein banned from YouTube because he wouldn't be able to critique him anymore. This is despite the fact the Quartering is reading out examples of Ethan Klein calling for family Christian channels to be mass flagged and banned from YouTube.

What The Quartering really means by this title is ''If YouTube was consistent'' but he left that out for click-bait purposes and to seem hardcore.

Centrist YouTube have become like those timid, docile rabbits in Watership Down who don't want to leave their hutches.

Both content creators and consumers in the Dissident Right should give themselves a pat on the back for utilizing more free speech friendly platforms even if it has been a ball-break at times.
https://youtu.be/ckuHOBVYDkA

I would be willing to talk to Nick Fuentes, but I am more interested in talking to his former fans. What did they like about Nick? Why did they finally turn away?

Currently in the works of having The Franklin come on for a stream soon.

Stay Tuned.

I'm streaming tonight!
https://youtu.be/FTdrNigBXqo

And then somehow it dawned on me that somehow, someone in this group had a Dox and a Swastika ready for my own picture to post publicly. I am not waiting to find out when that shoe drops. I think you can understand.

https://youtu.be/Jpvl_ryfLg4

All this is to say that I am forced here to break ties with Ralph’s community. It’s sad, he is interesting and intelligent and seemed to be making a contribution. This is not a judgement of his character as I am in no position as a sinner to make such a judgement. This is a judgement of safety. Once an online personality goes in for this kind of thing, it only grows. There is a demand that begins in the community they have fostered. I made this mistake once before giving out endless second chances to a person who pulled stunts like this until the bad actor eventually turned his ire on me. My wife made me promise I wouldn’t make the same mistake again. I don’t plan to.

Today's existential crisis.

There is a game we all know online. Take a taboo (enforced by the mainstream) on which you fall on the "right" side. Ostentatiously slam the "wrong" side as a means to dismiss ideas adjacent to the taboo and besmirch past writers who have spoken out on the wrong side of the taboo. When the more moderate curious people (who may partially believe in wrong think but don't emphasize it in their approach) show up to defend the school of thought, ruthlessly bait them with "hatchling" games, all the while tracking how far they have gone in exposing their own heretical beliefs. This conversation never goes anywhere, because once every hatching question is answered in full, you can simply yawn and pretend like your subject's attempts to answer your boneheaded questions about the taboo are in fact a rant delivered ex-nihilo because he is "obsessed" with the topic in question.

Once the dust has cleared from the public debate, you can then complain loudly about the dishonest of nefarious "bad-actors" who hide their "power-levels" to subvert an "honest" conversation. Then wait for your own community's autists (who don't understand the context or their own role in the process) to create weaponized exposes highlighting every element of your opponent’s wrong-think so that it can be used by bad actors to destroy your opponent’s real life livelihood.

A tried and true method. But why an existential crisis? Because I am not sure I am completely detached from this dishonest tactic in my own work. Sure enough when my enemies fall on the wrong side of the noncery taboo, I don't feel particularly charitable. I have used that line of attack to go after people like Focucalt and Butler who I disagree with for other reasons. Somehow though, it doesn't feel the same. There is a line somewhere but I cant quite sus it out. Any thoughts?

I am sick of all the right wing in-fighting. Big experimental content dump
tomorrow that has nothing to do with politics for those interested.