Downsizing move this week. Bookcase in banker boxes. 16 total. (Not all pictured)
- 1 Catholic
- 2 Literature
- 1 SciFi
- 1 Poetry
- 1 Art
- 2 Politics
- 1 History
- 2 Graphic novels
- 2 tech
- 1 how-to
- 2 Music
Interesting to see the background. Might livestream the shelving for content.

Let’s check on how Blue Check mark feminists are doing… https://twitter.com/DiscordianKitty/status/1522463063311626242?s=20&t=42Xoh6DlruOEJXkPxj86SA

The American system is happiest when it can depict the right as a bunch of crazed Christian zealots.

Due to me not having a home furnished with internet this Tuesday, there will be no Sunset stream. I will be back the next week :(

I wrote an article a Roe v. Wade. This one is important, please give it a quick read: https://charlemagne.substack.com/p/roe-v-wade

Necessary background to Charlemagnes last post. https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1522936722081865731?s=20&t=ITZ7AGl1I6DtBY-Qg_3DDg

Something interesting to talk about (I can’t in an extended form bc I have no net access beyond a phone this week). What happened to Nick Fuentes? Why does everyone think he is done? How did he fail? How could he have succeeded? What could have been done better?

This is not a “mature” or politically astute take on abortion, rather Spencer is falling into the opposite end of the same trap that has captured many light-weight Christians.

The sexual Revolution does not have a “line item veto”, it is a totalizing regime. Its advocates dripped out its issues piecemeal bc it benefitted their cause and obscured the real winners and losers. In reality there is no “abortion regime” distinct from the “contraception regime” distinct from the “casual sex regime”. It’s all one regime; the parts work together or not at all.

It makes no sense to ask “does abortion have a disgenic effect?” Or “Does birth control have a eugenic effect?”. The only real question is “did the sexual Revolution have an overall positive effect on human genetic health?”.

The answer to this question is obviously, obviously, obviously “no”.

I just realized that since I started my channel in 2016, I have moved 7 times. That’s 3 international moves, and 2 across state borders. Average time in one place is 10 months. 😩

Going Live with Anglo Ortho in 1 Hour!

https://youtu.be/F2taGw6Scwg

subscribe to the telegram of one of my greatest online friends... the inimitable giovanni pennacchietti https://t.me/giantartproductions

Finally internet has been restored!

People give the generational model a bad time for its arbitrary 18 year delineations between generations. However, it seems to have successfully captured the “doubling period” (inverse of half-life) for poz in our population.

Something must have happened in the week that I was away from the internet, none of the leftists have the Ukrainian flag on their profile anymore! Did we win the war guys?

Your character is your constraints.

For my Tuesday livestream I will be on “Break the Rules” tonight: https://youtu.be/WUFefLxbilY

Over the weekend I heard a normie-con explaining that we should "repeat the success" of the 1980s Moral Majority because "culture is downstream from politics". Cringe. A little knowledge is indeed a dangerous thing.

Really the "upstream-downstream" dynamic has almost nothing to do with "politics" and "culture" generally and everything to do with caste. High caste is upstream. Low caste is downstream. There is a relationship between "culture", "politics", and "law" but it is hard to map across different castes (since the categories would repeat). Looking inside a single caste, I think the dynamic would look something like this:

Law (rules that define what is "criminal") => culture (our dialectic conversation) => politics (the rules we make for others)

Here the "Law" category for a given caste is the result of the "politics" category from the caste above it, hence the fractal nature of the dynamic.

In this sense "politics is downstream from culture" but culture is not actually molded by the kind of politics people of one's caste generally control. Instead it is molded by political decisions accepted as default reality and which make a person feel "criminal" for going against. For instance, "Civil Rights Law" has molded mainstream culture, but "Civil Rights Law" is not a mainstream political issue; for most normies this is just the default law, just "the way things are". But in reality it has been politically decided by their betters.

I will understand “the fall of Nick Fuentes” after I understand his rise. Nothing changed about his product or his behavior, at least from what I can tell. People just stopped liking it.

That Was one of the more frustrating conversations I have had in a while.