Ansem 🐂🀄️
RT @_shugyosha: @blknoiz06 @NBA__trey like when you’re about to do end game and it tells you there’s no turning back so you’re min maxing everything hoping you don’t spec wrong for the mobs and boss — ya
tweet
RT @_shugyosha: @blknoiz06 @NBA__trey like when you’re about to do end game and it tells you there’s no turning back so you’re min maxing everything hoping you don’t spec wrong for the mobs and boss — ya
tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
justframe 💹🧲 (@_shugyosha) on X
always learning
Kekius Maximus
RT @teslaownersSV: “Here's Elon Musk who brought us into the era of electric vehicles, the only person who can shoot off rockets and get things to orbit and have the boosters land. China hasn't done it; the US hasn't done it; Boeing hasn't done it.” https://t.co/owMawMKfCk
tweet
RT @teslaownersSV: “Here's Elon Musk who brought us into the era of electric vehicles, the only person who can shoot off rockets and get things to orbit and have the boosters land. China hasn't done it; the US hasn't done it; Boeing hasn't done it.” https://t.co/owMawMKfCk
tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Tesla Owners Silicon Valley (@teslaownersSV) on X
The most notorious Tesla Club in the world. Creator of @thextakeover and taking the Takeover global. We amplify sustainability and philanthropy.
Kekius Maximus
💯
tweet
💯
Rounded to the nearest percent, 100% of Earth’s available energy over the long run is sunlight.
Fission is the only thing that even comes close, and it still rounds to zero.
Solar is paramount for the prosperity of future humans.
(and present ones) tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Jesse Peltan (@JessePeltan) on X
Rounded to the nearest percent, 100% of Earth’s available energy over the long run is sunlight.
Fission is the only thing that even comes close, and it still rounds to zero.
Solar is paramount for the prosperity of future humans.
(and present ones)
Fission is the only thing that even comes close, and it still rounds to zero.
Solar is paramount for the prosperity of future humans.
(and present ones)
ЦИФРОВОЙ ПОТОК [DRiver]
Photo
Lark Davis
RT @TheCryptoLark: Trade From Anywhere In The World With No KYC On Phemex!
Deep liquidity. All the best coins. OG crypto exchange.
Get up to $30,000 In Deposit and Trading Bonuses NOW using this link and start trading the way you are meant to, freely! 👇
https://t.co/dliOFtHOAr
tweet
RT @TheCryptoLark: Trade From Anywhere In The World With No KYC On Phemex!
Deep liquidity. All the best coins. OG crypto exchange.
Get up to $30,000 In Deposit and Trading Bonuses NOW using this link and start trading the way you are meant to, freely! 👇
https://t.co/dliOFtHOAr
tweet
Ansem 🐂🀄️
RT @notthreadguy: i deeply want to see internet capital markets work but i can't shake the "celebrity memecoin" parallels
think about it
> person knows almost nothing about crypto launches
> they do it because it's hot
> make a lot of money up front
> Hype it for a day or two. spaces. tweets.
> maybe a threadguy podcast if you're lucky
> initially bigger named celebs (better tech) pump harder until enough get destroyed and they all become the same
(what's 100mm followers vs. 10mm ARR)
then they slowly move on
> no rep risk bc they're not crypto native
> no social hit because all of their circles already hate crypto
> no follow up or follow through. nothing they did was illegal or "wrong" and at least they tried (honestly)
the vision for ICM is beautiful and it REALLY felt like sidelined capital was pouring in for the first time in a long time. but abruptly stopped
the problem isn't 2% fee/flywheel/liquidity/etc/etc/etc
the problem is that the game in it's current form is solved and not a single launch has shown ANY ability to drive fomo and bring new speculative capital in beyond the first hour
EVERY launch has played out something like
> launch coin
> tweet ca (catalyst)
> spaces (catalyst but usually awful)
> maybe official believe team support (final catalyst)
> MAYBE nikita bier reply (ACTUAL FINAL CATALYST)
> chart destroyed
the other side of the game (UNSOLVED)--> a dev that can evangelize a community and drive REAL fomo to fucking rip the chart, but there's nothing to say that will happen.
Shaw made you feel retarded for fading ai16z the whole way up.
topped at multiple billions.
Iggy/mother was the BEST celebrity coin. she proved competence. pushed on socials non stop. did the media tour. teased integrations. hosted the crazy party, etc.
It topped at 250mm
neither of these archetypes exist right now.
Imo it's no longer a credentials game: JellyJelly is a 20mm topper today
It's a game of can the founder of a new icm launch punish everyone that sells day one, figure out some "utility/integration" ponzi mechanism to drive price really high and make everyone feel like a complete moron for not top blasting your networth at 25mm
the capital on the sidelines wants to play this game. but in it's current form there's no reason to.
I'm not sure what the solve is and I REALLY hope they figure it out as I have a LARGE bag of believe, am a fan of ben pasternak and have always been and will continue to be an alliance/imran maxi
tweet
RT @notthreadguy: i deeply want to see internet capital markets work but i can't shake the "celebrity memecoin" parallels
think about it
> person knows almost nothing about crypto launches
> they do it because it's hot
> make a lot of money up front
> Hype it for a day or two. spaces. tweets.
> maybe a threadguy podcast if you're lucky
> initially bigger named celebs (better tech) pump harder until enough get destroyed and they all become the same
(what's 100mm followers vs. 10mm ARR)
then they slowly move on
> no rep risk bc they're not crypto native
> no social hit because all of their circles already hate crypto
> no follow up or follow through. nothing they did was illegal or "wrong" and at least they tried (honestly)
the vision for ICM is beautiful and it REALLY felt like sidelined capital was pouring in for the first time in a long time. but abruptly stopped
the problem isn't 2% fee/flywheel/liquidity/etc/etc/etc
the problem is that the game in it's current form is solved and not a single launch has shown ANY ability to drive fomo and bring new speculative capital in beyond the first hour
EVERY launch has played out something like
> launch coin
> tweet ca (catalyst)
> spaces (catalyst but usually awful)
> maybe official believe team support (final catalyst)
> MAYBE nikita bier reply (ACTUAL FINAL CATALYST)
> chart destroyed
the other side of the game (UNSOLVED)--> a dev that can evangelize a community and drive REAL fomo to fucking rip the chart, but there's nothing to say that will happen.
Shaw made you feel retarded for fading ai16z the whole way up.
topped at multiple billions.
Iggy/mother was the BEST celebrity coin. she proved competence. pushed on socials non stop. did the media tour. teased integrations. hosted the crazy party, etc.
It topped at 250mm
neither of these archetypes exist right now.
Imo it's no longer a credentials game: JellyJelly is a 20mm topper today
It's a game of can the founder of a new icm launch punish everyone that sells day one, figure out some "utility/integration" ponzi mechanism to drive price really high and make everyone feel like a complete moron for not top blasting your networth at 25mm
the capital on the sidelines wants to play this game. but in it's current form there's no reason to.
I'm not sure what the solve is and I REALLY hope they figure it out as I have a LARGE bag of believe, am a fan of ben pasternak and have always been and will continue to be an alliance/imran maxi
tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
threadguy (@notthreadguy) on X
not satire @probablynothing @monad_xyz @phantom
Cathie Wood
I served as an economist to Jennison Associates during those years, and I remember them well. During the early years of the Reagan Administration, Fed Chairman Volcker hiked the Fed funds rate from 10% to 20%, throwing the economy into back to back recessions.Starting in 1983,…
tweet
I served as an economist to Jennison Associates during those years, and I remember them well. During the early years of the Reagan Administration, Fed Chairman Volcker hiked the Fed funds rate from 10% to 20%, throwing the economy into back to back recessions.Starting in 1983,…
@CathieDWood @robruiz8 Your claim that Reaganomics reduced deficits is inaccurate. Data shows Reagan's policies tripled the national debt from $997B to $2.85T, with deficits averaging 4.0% of GDP vs. 2.2% before. Current policies share similarities like tax cuts and deregulation but differ significantly with Trump's protectionist tariffs, unlike Reagan's free-trade stance. Calling them "Reaganomics on steroids" exaggerates, as trade policies diverge, potentially impacting growth and deficits differently. tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Grok (@grok) on X
@robruiz8 @CathieDWood @CathieDWood @robruiz8 Your claim that Reaganomics reduced deficits is inaccurate. Data shows Reagan's policies tripled the national debt from $997B to $2.85T, with deficits averaging 4.0% of GDP vs. 2.2% before. Current policies share…
sassal.eth/acc 🦇🔊
RT @Jeyffre: There is no such thing as a neutral base layer.
Every blockchain is a mechanism for social consensus.
The question is how robust the social consensus is against manipulation.
What makes Bitcoin and ETH “decentralized” is that manipulating that many participants across spread-out geography, industries, and cultures is extremely hard, but not impossible.
The reason against putting in-protocol mechanism to enforce social consensus is that the lack of mechanisms forces a higher threshold of a change in social consensus. If it’s very hard to get an irregular state transition, then achieving the irregular state transition can only happen if a supermajority agree to it.
During WWII, Switzerland held gold by opposing sides (e.g. USA and Germany).
How could sworn enemies both trust the same entity when no blockchain existed back then?
Social consensus. The social consensus in Switzerland was believed to be robust.
This is why Bitcoin and ETH trade at premiums despite being the slowest blockchains. Their social consensus is the most robust. They are the closest thing to Switzerland during WW2.
tweet
RT @Jeyffre: There is no such thing as a neutral base layer.
Every blockchain is a mechanism for social consensus.
The question is how robust the social consensus is against manipulation.
What makes Bitcoin and ETH “decentralized” is that manipulating that many participants across spread-out geography, industries, and cultures is extremely hard, but not impossible.
The reason against putting in-protocol mechanism to enforce social consensus is that the lack of mechanisms forces a higher threshold of a change in social consensus. If it’s very hard to get an irregular state transition, then achieving the irregular state transition can only happen if a supermajority agree to it.
During WWII, Switzerland held gold by opposing sides (e.g. USA and Germany).
How could sworn enemies both trust the same entity when no blockchain existed back then?
Social consensus. The social consensus in Switzerland was believed to be robust.
This is why Bitcoin and ETH trade at premiums despite being the slowest blockchains. Their social consensus is the most robust. They are the closest thing to Switzerland during WW2.
If an L1 enforces censorship after a large hack, then why not go all the way to implement in-protocol mechanisms to enforce social consensus so that any consensus hack can be reverted?
In the end-state a chain is either a neutral base layer or a social consensus engine. tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Jeffrey Scholz (@Jeyffre) on X
Building the graduate school of blockchain engineering @rareskills_io | ZK Book: https://t.co/reIQL13u5o
ЦИФРОВОЙ ПОТОК [DRiver]
Photo
Ansem 🐂🀄️
hyperliquid
tweet
hyperliquid
Ah the worlds oldest profession is still stronger than ever.
OnlyFans is likely the most profitable per employee company in the. https://t.co/bk7KzMHEiX tweet
ЦИФРОВОЙ ПОТОК [DRiver]
Photo
Dennis Porter
Why do people keep making this argument?
Bitcoin is special precisely because its design dictates how it can be used.
Restrictions on what bitcoin can and can’t do is good for the decentralization of the protocol and therefore the accessibility to its governance. https://t.co/acDbFZPFcB
tweet
Why do people keep making this argument?
Bitcoin is special precisely because its design dictates how it can be used.
Restrictions on what bitcoin can and can’t do is good for the decentralization of the protocol and therefore the accessibility to its governance. https://t.co/acDbFZPFcB
tweet
Dennis Porter
JPEGS bloat the blockchain.
A bloated blockchain takes longer to download.
If downloads take too long there will be less node syncs.
If there are less nodes, decentralization will falter.
If decentralization falters bitcoin will become centralized.
tweet
JPEGS bloat the blockchain.
A bloated blockchain takes longer to download.
If downloads take too long there will be less node syncs.
If there are less nodes, decentralization will falter.
If decentralization falters bitcoin will become centralized.
tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Dennis Porter (@Dennis_Porter_) on X
JPEGS bloat the blockchain.
A bloated blockchain takes longer to download.
If downloads take too long there will be less node syncs.
If there are less nodes, decentralization will falter.
If decentralization falters bitcoin will become centralized.
A bloated blockchain takes longer to download.
If downloads take too long there will be less node syncs.
If there are less nodes, decentralization will falter.
If decentralization falters bitcoin will become centralized.
America is ‘going big’ on crypto after years of industry starvation
https://cryptopanic.com/news/22051671/America-is-going-big-on-crypto-after-years-of-industry-starvation
https://cryptopanic.com/news/22051671/America-is-going-big-on-crypto-after-years-of-industry-starvation
CryptoPanic
America is ‘going big’ on crypto after years of industry starvation
U. S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent affirmed that the administration is committed to positioning the country as the global leader in digital assets. Bessent, speaking to Bloomberg, said the government is “going big” on crypto, a striking contrast with…
Pi Network Launches Perpetual Futures on Kraken with 20x Leverage for U.S. Traders
https://cryptopanic.com/news/22051687/Pi-Network-Launches-Perpetual-Futures-on-Kraken-with-20x-Leverage-for-US-Traders
https://cryptopanic.com/news/22051687/Pi-Network-Launches-Perpetual-Futures-on-Kraken-with-20x-Leverage-for-US-Traders
CryptoPanic
Pi Network Launches Perpetual Futures on Kraken with 20x Leverage for U.S. Traders
The post Pi Network Launches Perpetual Futures on Kraken with 20x Leverage for U. S. Despite the buzz surrounding this major exchange debut, PI’s price has fallen 3