Researchers in Japan injected a common anaerobic bacteria into tumor-bearing mice and watched it navigate directly to the oxygen-starved tumor environment, colonize it, shrink it, and activate the immune system to destroy it, with no toxicity and no adverse effects on major organ systems.

A follow-up study tested a second bacterial strain, Ewingella americana, against colorectal cancer and found something even more striking. After treatment, all cured mice completely rejected a second introduction of tumor cells more than 60 days later. The immune system had learned, remembered, and refused to let the cancer return. The survival rate in the E. americana group was 100%. Standard chemotherapy and leading immunotherapy did not come close.

Jefferey Jaxen's report puts these findings in the context of a cancer establishment that has resisted precision and microbiome-based approaches for decades, and asks the questions MAHA leadership has so far avoided answering.

Full editorial linked below 👇

https://thehighwire.com/editorial/scientists-discover-common-bacteria-cures-100-of-colon-cancer-in-experiment/

@delbigtree

🚨This is IMPORTANT. The Farm Bill vote happening right now contains a provision that goes far beyond pesticide liability, and Dennis Kucinich came to the steps of the Supreme Court on Monday to make sure people understood what is actually at stake.

The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether Bayer can be shielded from state-level failure-to-warn lawsuits. But as Kucinich explained, the justices are not being asked to decide whether glyphosate causes cancer. They are being asked to decide whether states retain their constitutional right to protect the health and safety of their own people.

The 10th Amendment reserved that power to the states when this country was founded. The Supremacy Clause preemption argument Bayer is making, backed by the Trump Justice Department, would strip it away.

The Farm Bill makes this worse. Removing the pesticide liability shield language, as some representatives fought to do, does not address the EATS Act provisions buried in the same bill, which would block states from setting agricultural standards stronger than the federal baseline, covering chemical use, animal welfare, and beyond.

The Rules Committee refused to allow a vote on removing those provisions. That leaves voting no on the entire Farm Bill as the only remaining path to protecting states' rights over their own land, their own farmers, and their own communities.

This is a constitutional moment.

@delbigtree

On Monday, Representative Chellie Pingree stood on the steps of the Supreme Court and named what is actually happening in Congress right now.

Bayer has 53 lobbyists working Capitol Hill and is spending millions to jam a liability shield into the Farm Bill, language that would strip Americans of their right to sue when a product gives them cancer. Pingree fought to have it removed in committee.

Every single Republican and one Democrat voted to keep it in. Across the street from that rally, the House Rules Committee was deciding the same day whether the Pingree-Massie Protect Our Health Amendment would even be allowed a floor vote.

She has been an organic farmer in Maine since the 1970s and has been fighting this fight long before MAHA existed. Her message on Monday? No one can claim to support making America healthy again while voting to protect the companies spraying toxic chemicals on American farmland.

Cancer is not a partisan issue, and any Farm Bill that shields chemical companies over farm families is not pro-farmer, not pro-health, and not pro-America.

Bayer has the money. The people showed up Monday in Washington to make clear that is not enough.

@delbigtree

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday .

Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong.

Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer.

Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters.

So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

@delbigtree

The foundational paper behind the dominant Alzheimer's theory, the amyloid beta model that has directed over $1.6 billion in NIH funding, appears to have been based on fabricated research images. The model may be built on fraud. Amyloid beta still dominates research and drug development anyway.

Scientists who have pursued other explanations, including immune dysfunction and inflammation, say they have been systematically shut out of funding by what researchers themselves are calling the "amyloid mafia." This has been a protected theory surrounded by the people who profit from it, not science.

Meanwhile, a 2022 precision medicine study went almost entirely unnoticed. Alzheimer's patients were treated for nine months with personalized protocols targeting each individual's contributing factors. At three months, they improved. At six months, they kept improving. At nine months, they kept improving. Cognitive scores went up. That was supposed to be impossible. The medical consensus has been that Alzheimer's is a one-way road and the best anyone can do is slow the decline.

The summary of all of this is exactly right: being healthy makes you healthier. That should not be breaking news. The fact that it is tells you everything about how this disease has been managed.

@delbigtree

In March 2021, the NIH began treating Brianne Dressen and 22 other severely COVID vaccine-injured individuals. They were seeing some results. Patients were slightly improving. And then those 23 people were told to stay silent and wait, that the agency would release a study so that other injured people could receive the same treatment.

That study was never released. The patients were treated, some with some success, and then quietly abandoned. Other injured people who needed that treatment never found out it was possible.

Brianne Dressen recorded her Zoom calls with Peter Marks. In December 2022, while the NIH had already been treating these patients for over a year, Marks was telling people on camera there was no safety signal, that stories about thousands of deaths were false, that adverse events were "generally rare and mild."

He knew these patients existed. His agency was treating them. He went on camera and told the public otherwise.

@delbigtree

"...systematically concealing from the public the true risks involved with this vaccine in a way that not only misled patients, that not only misled parents, that not only endangered the lives of children, but had the net effects of lining the pockets of the biggest pharma companies in the world. That is a disgrace." - Josh Hawley

COVID was not bad for everyone. It was extraordinarily good for a handful of pharmaceutical companies that secured sweetheart government deals, offloaded their legal liability onto the public, collected billions, and are now sitting comfortably while injured patients are told the system has no remedy for them.

@delbigtree

Rand Paul has been demanding accountability since 2024 when almost no one in government would join him. Last week he posted on X that lying to Congress is a felony, destroying federal records is a felony, and advising others to destroy federal records is a felony, and that Fauci did all three. His advisor was just indicted. Paul's message to the DOJ was direct: Fauci is next, and the deadline to prosecute is May 11th.
That deadline is days away.

David Morens, Anthony Fauci's senior advisor at NIAID, has been indicted by the Department of Justice. The charges include conspiracy against the United States, destruction and falsification of federal records, concealment of records, and aiding and abetting. If convicted on all counts, he faces up to 51 years in prison.

His own emails explain why. In 2021, at the height of the pandemic, Morens wrote to colleagues that he had learned from the NIAID FOIA coordinator how to make emails disappear before a search begins. He put that in writing in a system subject to FOIA requests. He is now indicted.

The aiding and abetting charge carries its own implication. If Morens was aiding and abetting, the question of who he was doing it for has an obvious answer... Rand Paul knows what it is.

@delbigtree

David Morens put it in writing. In a system he knew could be searched through FOIA, he told colleagues to find the agency coordinator who could make emails disappear and to send anything sensitive to his personal Gmail. That is how a senior Fauci advisor communicated about federal records.

He was indicted, and the email trail that caught him was buried inside a 115,000-page document dump that nobody knew to search until they did.

That is one thread. The rest of the fabric is worse.

The CDC and FDA stopped sharing their weekly VAERS data analysis between agencies so it could not be captured by a FOIA request. Peter Marks was handed a report showing 25 serious safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, and ordered the people who brought it to him to go away. The algorithm being used to monitor vaccine safety was known to be masking what it was supposed to detect, and nobody in a position of authority moved to fix it.

Every one of those decisions caused so much harm. Families lost people, and parents watched their children suffer.

People who asked their doctor if the injection was safe and were told yes, while the agencies that were supposed to know the answer were actively working to not know it.

The indictment of David Morens is the first arrest. The question of what comes next for Peter Marks and everyone else who knew is one they will probably answer by taking the Fifth.

@delbigtree

👶One in six couples worldwide struggles with fertility. In the United States, that number is closer to one in two. Dr. Ann Shippy has spent 20 years watching this crisis unfold in her practice, and she has written the book she wishes she had before she had her own children.

"The Preconception Revolution" makes the case that the window before conception is one of the most consequential periods in a human life, and that what parents do during that time shapes not just whether they conceive, but the long-term health trajectory of the child they bring into the world.

The science behind it is epigenetics, the field that has established how the environment we bathe our genes in determines how those genes behave. That field has exploded in the last eight years, and what it is revealing about fertility, autism, neurological development, diabetes, obesity, and autoimmunity is changing what is possible in the preconception period.

Dr. Shippy joins Del to discuss what she has learned, what her patients have taught her, and what every person thinking about having a child in the modern world needs to understand before they start trying.

@delbigtree

‼️Men - you'll want to see this.

Most men have never been told that the three months before conception may be one of the most consequential periods of their lives, and not just for fertility.

The epigenetic markers carried in sperm capture information about everything happening in a man's body at the time of conception. Chronic stress, unresolved trauma, irregular blood sugar, and environmental toxins all get written into the biological instructions passed to the child.

Studies of populations who survived major famines show that the metabolic adaptations fathers made under duress were passed down through generations, making descendants more prone to weight gain even in times of plenty. The same mechanism is at work with plastics, PFAS, and pesticides, which increase the epigenetic risk for diabetes, obesity, autoimmunity, and cancer in future children.

Dr. Ann Shippy's message to men is genuinely hopeful.

The choices made in that preconception window, sleep, exercise, clean nutrition, reducing toxic load, and addressing stress, have a measurable impact on the health of the child and potentially multiple generations beyond.

The athletic ability, the cognitive capacity, the immune resilience of that future child - fathers have more influence over those outcomes than anyone has told them.

@delbigtree

🥩 @RepThomasMassie has been fighting for the PRIME Act for years, and it's been folded into the Farm Bill that passed the House.

The PRIME Act allows small farmers and ranchers to slaughter their own animals on site and sell directly to local restaurants, households, and community members without federal oversight. Right now, even a farmer selling steaks at a local farmers' market has to route the animal through a large federally inspected processing facility, often a corporate plant, before it can be sold. That process adds high cost, which is why locally raised beef at a farmers' market carries a price tag that shocks most people.

The PRIME Act cuts that middleman out entirely for small, local operations.

This is the kind of food freedom that used to just be called farming. Knowing your farmer, buying directly from the source, skipping the corporate processing chain - it is a straightforward idea that has been buried under layers of federal regulation for decades.

The bill now heads to the Senate.

@delbigtree

Bipartisan Uprising: The People vs. Poison Rally

Two months of planning, one public sidewalk in front of the Supreme Court, and a coalition that nobody in Washington saw coming

The crowd that gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court on April 27th was not the audience anyone expected: organic farmers from Maine and Ohio, cancer survivors, widows of farmers who used Roundup because they were told it was safe, environmental activists, health advocates, elected officials from both sides of the aisle, and families whose children are eating glyphosate in their school lunches, their cereal, and their baby food.

Speakers named names and told stories: a husband who served eight years in the military, never smoked, chose Roundup specifically because he was told it was safe, and was dead of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma before his wife could get him into chemotherapy in time. A woman who survived a golf ball-sized tumor in her lymphatic system. A man whose grandfather farmed with paraquat and died with Parkinson's. A son whose father believed he was feeding the world and later watched that same son acknowledge that they had contaminated their own drinking water and lakes.

The rally organizers had held back on promotion, worried about overcrowding the permitted area, and the crowd showed up anyway in numbers that exceeded every projection. Speeches from the steps were seen hundreds of millions of times across X and Instagram in the days that followed.

After the rally, the crowd marched to the Capitol and sat inside the Rules Committee hearing where farm bill amendments were being debated. The pesticide liability shield language was stripped from the bill, with Democrats providing the votes that made it happen alongside Republican co-sponsors including Representatives Massie and Pingree.

The amendment that carried was modeled on the Massie-Pingree language and renamed, and both co-sponsors supported it anyway.

Reporters from the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, CNN, NBC, and NPR showed up and could not find a villain. Both sides of the aisle were standing together, and the media had no framework for it.

It's a tectonic plate shift, a return to the kind of politics where something so obviously harmful simply gets recognized as such across party lines. The Supreme Court is still deliberating on whether to hand Bayer a liability shield that would close the courthouse doors to the 170,000 cancer plaintiffs already in line and block every future case. The vote in the House is now on record. The justices are watching.

@delbigtree

The First Domino? Fauci Adviser Indicted

Dr. David Morens, senior adviser to Anthony Fauci at NIAID, has been indicted. The emails that got him there have been public for two years.

We walk through the indictment and the paper trail behind it. The emails obtained by @RonJohnson's team and made public in 2024 show Morens writing in 2021 that he had learned from the agency's FOIA coordinator how to make emails disappear before a search begins, concluding that he and his colleagues were safe.

A separate email to EcoHealth Alliance's Peter Daszak describes routing sensitive correspondence to Fauci's personal Gmail account or delivering it by hand, explicitly because Fauci was, in Morens's own words, too smart to let colleagues send him things that could cause trouble.

The Department of Justice indictment charges Morens with conspiracy against the United States, destruction, alteration, and falsification of records in federal investigations, concealment and removal of records, and aiding and abetting. The maximum penalty for each destruction count is 20 years. The maximum for the conspiracy charge is five years.

Rand Paul called for this prosecution in 2024 when the evidence was already public and virtually every other elected official was silent.

He is now back on X with a message: lying to Congress is a felony, destroying federal records is a felony, advising others to destroy federal records is a felony, and Fauci did all three.

The statute of limitations deadline to prosecute Fauci is May 11th.

Morens is charged with aiding and abetting, which means the question the Department of Justice now has to answer is who he was aiding and abetting?

Biden's auto-pen pardon adds a layer of legal complexity that will shape how this plays out, but the indictment of the man directly beneath Fauci marks the first time the Covid oversight effort has produced a criminal charge.

The window for more is closing fast.

@DelBigtree

Sen. Ron Johnson: The Covid Reckoning

An FDA scientist warned that the agency's vaccine safety surveillance system would mask Covid injection signals. She was told to cease and desist. The documents proving it are now in @RonJohnson's hands.

Del Bigtree sat down with Senator Johnson the day after one of the most consequential oversight hearings in the Covid reckoning so far.

The centerpiece is an FDA analyst who identified that the mathematical algorithm being used to monitor post-authorization Covid injection safety was structurally incapable of detecting signals when two similar products, Pfizer and Moderna, were being analyzed simultaneously.

She brought a multi-page presentation to Peter Marks, head of CBER at the FDA, who thanked her and ignored it. Twenty-six days later she returned with an updated system that, when applied to the existing data, revealed 49 instances of masked signals and 25 safety events flagged as serious, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell's palsy, multiple types of stroke, and multiple types of cardiac arrhythmia.

Marks responded by ordering her to stand down. She was treated, in Johnson's words, as persona non grata. The agency continued using the system it had already been told would hide what it was supposed to find, and Peter Marks continued telling the public and vaccine-injured individuals on recorded Zoom calls that no safety signal was being detected.

The second bombshell from the hearing involves 23 vaccine-injured individuals, including Brianne Dressen, who were brought into an NIH treatment program beginning in March 2021.

Researchers were seeing some success. The injured patients were told to stay silent, that the NIH would publish the study and formally acknowledge their injuries so others could access treatment. The study was never published. The acknowledgment never came. The 23 patients were told to keep quiet in exchange for a promise that was broken.

Those patients wanted to be seen, heard, and believed so they could get treatment. The FDA saw them, heard them, believed them, and said nothing to the American public.

The week of the hearing also brought the arrest of Dr. David Morens, a senior Fauci adviser whose emails, discovered by Johnson's staff inside a 115,000-page document dump from a university grantee, showed him explicitly describing how to make emails disappear through FOIA-evasion techniques and directing colleagues to route sensitive correspondence to his personal Gmail account.

Johnson's current interim report, titled "Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward Covid-19 Vaccine Injury Safety Signals," documents the same pattern of deliberate off-channel communication across multiple agencies.

For everything on Peter Marks's public statements versus what the documents now show, visit therealpetermarks.com.

@delbigtree

Three people died on a cruise ship from hantavirus and the media coverage that followed treated it as a potential pandemic. Here is the actual context.

Since surveillance began in 1993, the United States has recorded roughly 30 hantavirus cases per year on average. About 10 people per year die from it. For comparison, lightning strikes kill 20 to 30 Americans annually.

The primary transmission route is exposure to aerosolized rodent droppings and saliva, and experts confirm the virus would need a major evolutionary leap to spread efficiently between people.

Moderna and Korea University's Vaccine Innovation Center are already collaborating on an mRNA hantavirus vaccine.

The market for a product targeting a disease that kills roughly 10 Americans per year is not driven by public health math. It is driven by fear, and the cruise ship coverage is doing exactly the work it needs to do.

@delbigtree

The production of vaccines currently requires the slaughter of millions of animals every year, and the laboratories running those processes employ enormous numbers of people across every level of administration and research.

Dr. Tess Lawrie is calling for a deep and thorough investigation into all of it. Pandemic preparedness has become a racket, with stockpiles of viral material sitting in labs ready to sustain the cycle indefinitely. That infrastructure needs to be examined from top to bottom, from administrative staff to the researchers themselves, and the accountability needs to happen before it is quietly preserved and repurposed for the next emergency.

@delbigtree

The acellular pertussis vaccine does not prevent colonization of the bacteria. A peer-reviewed consensus paper, signed by 16 of the world's leading pertussis experts, confirmed it. The vaccine does not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and provides no herd immunity.

What it does do is suppress symptoms. A vaccinated person can carry and transmit the bacteria without knowing they are sick, which turns them into an asymptomatic spreader. The unvaccinated person who gets sick feels sick, stays home, and is known to be contagious.

The vaccinated person feels fine, goes to work, goes to school, and spreads it everywhere.

The entire justification for mandating this vaccine rests on a transmission benefit the science says does not exist.

@delbigtree

🚨NEWS: Researcher behind study claiming no link between MMR and autism extradited:

Poul Thorsen co-authored the most widely cited study used to dismiss any link between the MMR vaccine and autism. That study was used to shut down more than 5,000 autism injury claims in federal vaccine court.

Thorsen was indicted in 2011 on 13 counts of wire fraud and 9 counts of money laundering for stealing over $1 million in CDC grant money. He spent 15 years evading arrest in Denmark before being extradited to the United States last week.

The fraud charges relate to grant money, not the science itself, and Thorsen has not been convicted of anything. But a 2025 reanalysis of the Madsen et al. study he co-authored found that its unadjusted results do not support rejecting a causal link between the MMR vaccine and autism, and the authors called for the release of the raw data to ensure transparency.

The CDC updated its own website in November 2025 to state that the claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out that possibility.

The cornerstone study used to close the door on this question for two decades was co-authored by a man now standing trial for research fraud. The full article has everything.

https://thehighwire.com/news/vaccine-autism-researcher-accused-of-stealing-1-million-from-cdc-extradited-to-u-s/

@delbigtree

🚨A CIA whistleblower testified under oath today that the government's official Covid origins report is false.
Senator Josh Hawley laid out the timeline.

Congress passed a law requiring declassification of any and all information linking the Wuhan Institute of Virology to Covid-19. The Biden administration blew through the statutory deadline, then produced five pages, all heavily redacted. One of them a cover note.

Hawley held it up in the hearing room. Then asked CIA whistleblower James Erdmann: is this all the information the US government had?

It is not. Director Gabbard is currently working through an estimated 2,000 pages for the first release batch alone. Former DNI Avril Haines signed the letter to Hawley saying five pages was everything they could declassify. Her office sent it - with her signature.

Hawley read the two key conclusions from that report into the record. Nothing researched at the Wuhan lab could plausibly be a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2. No evidence of any research-related incident involving Wuhan employees. Then he asked Erdmann directly: are those statements true?

"No. I don't believe that's true."

Three violations, on the record. They defied the law. They withheld thousands of pages they knew were covered by it. And the conclusions they did release are false.

Hawley closed with this: if elected and unelected officials can blatantly violate the statutes of this country and lie to the American people, we don't have a democracy anymore.

Full clip linked below 👇

@DelBigtree

"I need the mainstream media, CBS, ABC, CNN to step forward and start covering what is a major scam. How many thousands, tens, hundreds of thousands of people are permanently disabled or possibly lost their life because our FDA hid the fact that there were safety signals screaming at them with the COVID injection?

So again, you can't answer all my questions... but we need to figure out who is running this deep state"

@delbigtree